Advertisement

Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 25–52 | Cite as

Effects of Leader Support in the Work Unit on the Relationship Between Work Spillover and Family Adaptation

  • Gary L. Bowen
Article

Abstract

This study examines the direct versus the buffering effect of leader support in the work unit on the relationship between work spillover and family adaptation. The analyses use data from a probability sample of 3,190 married soldiers in the U.S. Army who participated in the 1989 Army and Family Survey, and the data are analyzed by the gender of the respondent. Two types of work spillover are examined in the analysis (energy and time interference), and both internal and external types of family adaptation are hypothesized and supported by the empirical analysis. Only modest support is found for the buffering effect hypothesis. In support of the direct effect hypothesis, the findings indicate that leader support in the work unit decreases perceptions of work spillover, which is a preventive effect, and enhances perceptions of external adaptation, which is a therapeutic effect.

work and family family adaptation workplace supports military families social support 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baruch, G. K., Biener, L., & Barnett, R. C. (1987). Women and gender in research on work and family stress. American Psychologist, 42(2), 130–136.Google Scholar
  2. Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980). Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, P. S., Cook, A. S., DelCampo, R. L., Herrera, R. S., & Weigel, R. R. (1994). Family/work roles' relation to perceived stress: Do gender and ethnicity matter? Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 15, 223–242.Google Scholar
  4. Billings, A. G., & Moos, R. H. (1982). Work stress and the stress-buffering roles of work and family resources. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 3, 215–232.Google Scholar
  5. Blankinship, D. A. (1990). Army family research program: The role of installation leaders in creating a supportive family environment. In D. A. Blankinship, S. L. Bullman, & G. M. Croan (Eds.), The policy, program, and fiscal implications of military family research: Proceedings of the 1990 military family research review. (pp. 128–142). Fairfax, VA: Caliber Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Blau, P. M. (1960). Structural effects. American Sociological Review, 25, 178–193.Google Scholar
  7. Bolger, N., DeLongis, A., Kessler, R. C., & Wethington, E. (1989). The contagion of stress across multiple roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 175–183.Google Scholar
  8. Bowen, G. L. (1988). Corporate supports for the family lives of employees: A conceptual model for program planning and evaluation. Family Relations, 37, 183–188.Google Scholar
  9. Bowen, G. L. (1989a). Family adaptation to relocation: An empirical analysis of family stressors, adaptive resources, and sense of coherence (Techical Report 856). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  10. Bowen, G. L. (1989b). Satisfaction with family life in the military. Armed Forces and Society, 15, 571–592.Google Scholar
  11. Bowen, G. L. (1991). Navigating the marital journey. MAP: A corporate support program for couples. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  12. Bowen, G., & Neenan, P. (1989). Organizational attitude toward families and satisfaction with the military as a way of life: Perceptions of civilian spouses of U.S. Army members. Family Perspective, 23, 3–13.Google Scholar
  13. Bowen, G. L., & Orthner, D. K. (Eds.). (1989). The organization family: Work and family linkages in the U.S. military. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  14. Bowen, G. L., Orthner, D. K., & Zimmerman, L. I. (1993). Family adaptation of single parents in the United States Army: An empirical analysis of work stressors and adaptive resources. Family Relations, 42, 293–304.Google Scholar
  15. Bowen, G. L., Orthner, D. K., & Bell, D. B. (1997). Differences in spouses' perceptions of family adaptation. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 53–72.Google Scholar
  16. Bowen, G. L., & Pittman, J. F. (1993). Family adaptation to relocation in the U.S. Air Force: Implications for policy and practice. Washington, DC: Department of the United States Air Force.Google Scholar
  17. Bowen, G. L., & Pittman, J. F. (Eds.). (1995). The work and family interface: Toward a contextual effects perspective. Minneapolis, MN: National Council on Family Relations.Google Scholar
  18. Burke, R. J. (1982). Occupational demands on administrators and spouses' satisfaction and well-being. Psychological Reports, 51, 823–836.Google Scholar
  19. Burke, R. J., & Greenglass, E. R. (1987). Work and family. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 1987 (pp. 273–320). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  20. Burke, R. J., & Weir, T. (1982). Husband-wife helping relationships as moderators of experienced stress: The “mental hygiene” factor in marriage. In H. I. McCubbin, A. E. Cauble, & J. M. Patterson (Eds.), Family stress, coping, and social support (pp. 221–238). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  21. Caplan, R. D. (1987). Person-environment fit theory and organizations: Commensurate dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 248–267.Google Scholar
  22. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Cronbach, L. J. (1958). Proposals leading to analytic treatment of social perception scores. In R. Tagiuri & L. Petrullo (Eds.), Person perception and interpersonal behavior (pp. 353–379). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Crouter, A. C. (1984). Spillover from family to work: The neglected side of the work-family interface. Human Relations, 37, 425–442.Google Scholar
  25. Crouter, A. C., Perry-Jenkins, M., Huston, T. L., & Crawford, D. W. (1989). The influence of work-induced psychological states on behavior at home. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 273–292.Google Scholar
  26. Evans, P., & Bartolome, F. (1986). The dynamics of work-family relationships in managerial lives. International Review of Applied Psychology, 35, 371–395.Google Scholar
  27. Geller, P. A., & Hobfoll, S. E. (1994). Gender differences in job stress, tedium and social support in the workplace. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 555–572.Google Scholar
  28. Greenberger, E., Goldberg, W. A., Hamill, S., O'Neil, R., & Payne, C. K. (1989). Contributions of a supportive work environment to parents' well-being and orientation to work. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17(6), 755–783.Google Scholar
  29. Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. In B. C. Miller & D. H. Olson (Eds.), Family studies: Review yearbook (pp. 299–319). Beverly Hills, California: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Greenhaus, J. H., & Kopelman, R. E. (1981). Conflict between work and nonwork roles: Implications for the career planning process. Human Resource Planning, 4, 1–10.Google Scholar
  31. Harrison, R. V. (1978). Person-environment fit and job stress. In C. L. Cooper & R. Payne (Eds.), Stress at work (pp. 175–205). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  32. House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  33. Jones, A. P., & Butler, M. C. (1980). A role transition approach to the stresses of organizationally induced family role disruption. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 367–376.Google Scholar
  34. Kanter, R. M. (1977). Work and family in the United States: A critical review and agenda for research and policy. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Kobasa, S. C. O., & Puccetti, M. C. (1983). Personality and social resources in stress resistance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 839–850.Google Scholar
  36. LaRocco, J. M., House, J. S., & French, J. R. P., Jr. (1980). Social support, occupational stress, and health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 202–218.Google Scholar
  37. LaRocco, J. M., & Jones, A. P. (1978). Co-worker and leader support as moderators of stress-strain relationships in work situations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 629–634.Google Scholar
  38. Lavee, Y., & McCubbin, H. I. (1985, November). Adaptation in family stress theory: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Paper presented at the Theory Construction and Research Methodology Workshop, National Council on Family Relations, Dallas, Texas.Google Scholar
  39. Lavee, Y., McCubbin, H. I., & Patterson, J. M. (1985). The double ABCX model of family stress and adaptation: An empirical test by analysis of structural equations with latent variables. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 811–825.Google Scholar
  40. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  41. Martin, J. A., & Orthner, D. K. (1989). The “company town” in transition: Rebuilding military communities. In G. L. Bowen & D. K. Orthner (Eds.), The organization family: Work and family linkages in the U.S. military (pp. 163–177). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  42. McCubbin, H. I., & Lavee, Y. (1986). Strengthening Army families: A family life cycle stage perspective. Evaluation and Program Planning, 9, 221–231.Google Scholar
  43. McCubbin, M. A., & McCubbin, H. I. (1987). Family stress theory and assessment: T-double ABCX model of family adjustment and adaptation. In H. I. McCubbin & A. I. Thompson (Eds.), Family assessment inventories for research and practice. (pp. 3–32). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  44. Near, J. P., Rice, R. W., & Hunt, R. G. (1980). The relationship between work and nonwork domains: A review of empirical research. The Academy of Management Review, 5, 415–429.Google Scholar
  45. O'Neil, R., & Greenberger, E. (1994). Patterns of commitment to work and parenting: Implications for role strain. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 101–112.Google Scholar
  46. Orthner, D. K., Bowen, G. L., & Beare, V. G. (1990). The organization family: A question of work and family boundaries. Marriage and Family Review, 15(3/4), 15–36.Google Scholar
  47. Piotrkowski, C. S. (1979). Work and family system: A naturalistic study of working-class and lower middle-class families. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  48. Pittman, J. F. (1994). Work/family fit as a mediator of work factors on marital tension: Evidence from the interface of greedy institutions. Human Relations, 47, 183–209.Google Scholar
  49. Pittman, J. F., & Bowen, G. L. (1995). Understanding the joint contributions of individual-level and unit-level variables on adaptation to work: The case of military relocation (Technical Report). Washington, D.C.: Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Personnel Support, Families and Education.Google Scholar
  50. Pittman, J. F., & Kerpelman, J. L. (1996). Internal and external adaptation in Army families separated by Desert Shield/Storm: The role of services and unit culture (Technical Report). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  51. Pittman, J. F., & Orthner, D. K. (1988). Predictors of spouse support for the work commitments of husbands. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 335–348.Google Scholar
  52. Pleck, J. (1977). The work-family role system. Social Problems, 24, 417–427.Google Scholar
  53. Repetti, R. L. (1987). Individual and common components of the social environment at work and psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 710–720.Google Scholar
  54. Repetti, R. L. (1989). Effects of daily workload on subsequent behavior during marital interaction: The roles of social withdrawal and spouse support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 651–659.Google Scholar
  55. Research Triangle Institute. (1990). AFRP analysis plan (Volume II: Appendices). Research Triangle Park, NC: Author.Google Scholar
  56. Rosenfeld, L., Bowen, G. L., & Richman, J. M. (1995). Communication in three types of dual-career marriages. In M.A. Fitzpatrick & A.L. Vangelisti (Eds.), Explaining family interactions (pp. 257–289). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Revised ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Segal, M. W. (1995). Women's military roles cross-nationally: Past, present, and future. Gender & Society, 9, 757–775.Google Scholar
  59. Shields, P. M. (1988). Sex roles in the military. In C. C. Moskos & F. R. Wood (Eds.), The military: More than just a job (pp. 99–113). Washington, DC: Pergamon-Brassey.Google Scholar
  60. Small, S. A., & Riley, D. (1990). Toward a multidimensional assessment of work spillover into family life. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 51–61.Google Scholar
  61. Teitelbaum, J. M. (1990). Effective family supportiveness. In D. A. Blankinship, S. L. Bullman, & G. M. Croan (Eds.), The policy, program, and fiscal implications of military family research: Proceedings of the 1990 military family research review. (pp. 110–127). Fairfax, VA: Caliber Associates.Google Scholar
  62. Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work, and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 845–871.Google Scholar
  63. Voydanoff, P. (1988). Work role characteristics, family structure demands, and work/family conflict. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 749–761.Google Scholar
  64. Warren, J. A., & Johnson, P. J. (1995). The impact of workplace support on work-family role strain. Family Relations, 44, 163–169.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary L. Bowen
    • 1
  1. 1.University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill

Personalised recommendations