Skip to main content
Log in

Survivor Function Estimators Under Group Sequential Monitoring Based on the Logrank Statistic

  • Published:
Lifetime Data Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we investigate a group sequential analysis of censored survival data with staggered entry, in which the trial is monitored using the logrank test while comparisons of treatment and control Kaplan-Meier curves at various time points are performed at the end of the trial. We concentrate on two-sample tests under local alternatives. We describe the relationship of the asymptotic bias of Kaplan-Meier curves between the two groups. We show that even if the asymptotic bias of the Kaplan-Meier curve is negligible relative to the true survival, this is not the case for the difference between the curves of the two arms of the trial. A corrected estimator for the difference between the survival curves is presented and by simulations we show that the corrected estimator reduced the bias dramatically and has a smaller variance. The methods of estimation are applied to the Beta-Blocker Heart Attack Trial (1982), a well-known group sequential trial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • P. K. Andersen, O. Borgan, R. D. Gill, and N. Keiding, Statistical Models Based on Counting Processes, Springer-Verlag: New-York, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Armitage, Sequential Medical Trials, first and second edition, Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 1960, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beta-Blocker Heart Attack Trial Research Group, “A randomized trial on propranolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction,” The Journal of the American Medical Association vol. 247 pp. 1707–1714, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. L. DeMets, R. Hardy, L. M. Friedman, and K. K. G. Lan, “Statistical aspects of early termination in the beta-blocker heart attack trial,” Controlled Clinical Trials vol. 5 pp. 362–372, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. S. Emerson and P. L. C. Banks, “Estimation of secondary outcomes following a group sequential trial,” Presentation at ENAR Biometric Society Conference, Cincinnati, OH, May 1992.

  • S. S. Emerson and T. R. Fleming, “Parameter estimation following a group sequential hypothesis testing,” Biometrika vol. 77 pp. 875–892, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. M. Facy and J. Whitehead, “An improved approximation for calculation of confidence intervals after a sequential clinical trial,” Statistics in Medicine vol. 9 pp. 1277–1285, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Gorfine, “Estimation of a secondary parameter in a group sequential clinical trial,” PhD Thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Gorfine, “Estimation of a secondary parameter in a group sequential clinical trial,” Biometrics vol. 57 pp. 589–597, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Jennison, “Sequential methods for medical experiments,” PhD Thesis, Cornell University, 1982.

  • C. Jennison and B. W. Turnbull, “Confidence interval for a binomial parameter following a multistage test with application to MIL-STD 105D and medical trials,” Technometrics vol. 25 pp. 49–58, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Jennison and B. W. Turnbull, “Repeated confidence intervals for group sequential clinical trials,” Control Clinical Trials vol. 5 pp. 33–45, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Jennison and B. W. Turnbull, “Repeated confidence intervals for the median survival time,” Biometrika vol. 72 pp. 619–625, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Jennison and B. W. Turnbull, Group Sequential Methods with Applications to Clinical Trials, Chapman and Hall/CRC: Boca Raton and London, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. G. Gu and T. L. Lai, “Weak convergence of time-sequential censored rank statistics with application to sequential testing in clinical trials,” Annals of Statistics vol. 19 pp. 1403–1433, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. D. Kalbfleisch and R. L. Prentice, The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, Wiley: New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. L. Kaplan and P. Meier, “Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observations,” Journal of the American Statistical Association vol. 53 pp. 457–481, 562-563, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Siegmund, “Estimation following sequential tests,” Biometrika vol. 65 pp. 341–349, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Starr and M. Woodroofe, “Remark on a stopping time,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Ser. vol. 61 pp. 1215–1218, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. A. Tsiatis, G. L. Rosner, and R. C. Mehta, “Exact confidence intervals following a group sequential test,” Biometrics vol. 40 pp. 797–803, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Whitehead, The Design and Analysis of Sequential Clinical Trials, Ellis Horwood: Chichester, England, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Whitehead, “On the bias of maximum likelihood estimation following a sequential test,” Biometrika vol. 73 pp. 573–581, 1986a.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Whitehead, “Supplementary analysis at the conclusion of a sequential clinical trial,” Biometrics vol. 42 pp. 461–471, 1986b.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Woodroofe, “Estimation after sequential testing: A simple approach for truncated sequential probability ratio test,” Biometrika vol. 79 pp. 347–353, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Yakir, “Secondary inference in a sequential clinical trial,” A technical report, 1994.

  • B. Yakir, “On the distribution of a concomitant statistic in a sequential trial,” Sequential Analysis vol. 16 pp. 287–294, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gorfine, M. Survivor Function Estimators Under Group Sequential Monitoring Based on the Logrank Statistic. Lifetime Data Anal 9, 175–193 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022982902929

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022982902929

Navigation