Skip to main content
Log in

When Do People Find Cooperation Most Justified? The Effect of Trust and Self–Other Merging in Social Dilemmas

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On the basis of goal/expectation theory, it was predicted that just as in interpersonal relationships, cooperation in social dilemma groups would increase only if both trust was high and group members had a common goal of cooperation. Introducing new measures of both these two processes to the social dilemma arena, the goal of mutual cooperation was assessed by the process of self—other merging (the IOS scale), and trust by assessing the extent to which one trusted others and one believed one was perceived as trustworthy by the others. The results showed that when both self—other merging and trust was high, cooperation was indeed highest. Implications for the specific functions of trust and self—other merging in social dilemmas are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

FERENCES

  • Aiken, L. S., and West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions, Sage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., and Aron, N. E. (1986). Love as the Expansion of Self: Understanding Attraction and Satisfaction, Hemisphere, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., Aron, E. N., and Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 63: 596-612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., and Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 60: 241-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., and McLaughin-Volpe, T. (2001). Including others in the self: Extensions to own and partner's group memberships. In: Sedikides, C., and Brewer, M. B. (eds.), Individual Self, Relational Self, Collective Self, Psychology Press, Hove, England, pp. 89-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brann, P., and Foddy, M. (1987). Trust and the consumption of a deteriorating common resource. J. Conflict Resolut. 31: 615-630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 17: 475-482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couch, L. L., and Jones, W. H. (1997). Measuring levels of trust. J. Res. Pers. 31: 319-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 31: 169-193.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D., and Van Dijk, E. (2002). Reactions to group success and failure as a function of group identification: A test of the goal-transformation hypothesis in social dilemmas. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 38: 435-442.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D., van Knippenberg, D., Van Dijk, E., and van Leeuwen, E. (2002). Cooperating if One's Goals are Collective-Based: Social Identification Effects in Social Dilemmas as a Function of Goal-Transformation. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • De Cremer, D., and Van Vugt, M. (1998). Collective identity and cooperation in public goods dilemmas: A matter of trust or self-efficacy. Curr. Res. Soc. Psychol. 3: 1-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D., and Van Vugt, M. (1999). Social identification effects in social dilemmas: A transformation of motives. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 29: 871-893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K. T. (1999). The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 84: 445-455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K. T. (2000). Trust in leadership and team performance: Evidence from NCAA basketball. J. Appl. Psychol. 85: 1004-1012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D. (1988). Can we trust trust? In: Gambetta, D. (ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp. 213-237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1992). Problems of explanation in economic society. In: Nohria, N., and Eccles, R. G. (ed.), Network and Organizations, Harvard Business Press, Boston, pp. 22-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. R., and George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Acad. Manage. Rev. 23: 531-546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, N. (1992). Efficacy as a causal and moderating variable in social dilemmas. In: Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M., and Wilke, H. A. M. (eds.), Social Dilemmas: Theoretical Issues and Research, Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY, pp. 59-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komorita, S. S., and Parks, C. D. (1994). Social Dilemmas, Brown & Benchmark, Dubuque, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 50: 569-598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. M., and Brewer, M. B. (1984). Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46: 1044-1057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. M., Brewer, M. B., and Hanna, B. A. (1996). Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision. In: Kramer, R. M., and Tyler, T. R. (eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, Sage, Thousands Oaks, pp. 357-389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. M., and Goldman, L. (1995). Helping the group or helping yourself? Social motives and group identity in resource dilemmas. In: Schroeder, D. A. (ed.), Social Dilemmas: Perspectives on Individuals and Groups, Praeger, Westport, CT, pp. 49-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., and Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manage. Rev. 20: 709-734.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad. Manage. J. 38: 24-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks, C. D. (1994). The predictive ability of social values in resource dilemmas and public goods games. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 20: 431-438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks, C. D., and Hulbert, L. G. (1995). High and low trusters' responses to fear in a payoff matrix. J. Conflict Resolut. 39: 718-730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, J. (1973). Social traps. Am. Psychol. 28: 641-651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, D. G., and Kimmel, M. (1977). Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 28: 363-392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring, P. S., and van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Development processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Acad. Manage. Rev. 19: 90-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutte, C., and Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). Goals, expectations and behavior in a social dilemma situation. In: Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M., and Wilke, H. A. M. (eds.), Social Dilemmas: Theoretical Issues and Research, Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY, pp. 289-305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E., Coats, S., and Walling, D. (1999). Overlapping mental representations of self, in-group, and partner: Further response time evidence and a connectionist model. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 25: 873-882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T. (1986). The provision of a sanctioning system as public good. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51: 110-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T., and Sato, K. (1986). Motivational bases of the public goods problem. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50: 67-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilke, H. A. M., and Braspenning, J. (1989). Reciprocity: Choice shift in a social trap. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 19: 317-326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wit, A. P., and Kerr, N. L. (2002). Me versus just us versus us all: Categorization and cooperation in nested social dilemmas. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 83: 616-637.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David De Cremer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Cremer, D., Stouten, J. When Do People Find Cooperation Most Justified? The Effect of Trust and Self–Other Merging in Social Dilemmas. Social Justice Research 16, 41–52 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022974027023

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022974027023

Navigation