Skip to main content

Issues in the Transition to Teams

Abstract

The process of “retrofit” change from traditional work structures to a team structure is described from the viewpoint of employees engaged in the process. Results of extensive interviews and factor analysis of a questionnaire administered to a large group of incipient team members revealed four general factors of concern in this transition to teams. Relationships between these factors and performance improvement over time were found.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  • Campion, M.A., Medsker, G.J., & Higgs, A.C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvir, T., Eden, D., & Banjo, M.L. (1995). Self-fulfilling prophecy and gender: Can women be Pygmalion and Galatea? Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 253–271.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • George, J.M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, R.A. & Salas, E. (1995). Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, R.A. & Shea, G.P. (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In M.D. Dunnette and L.M. Hough (Eds.) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, v. 3, chpt. 5.

  • Hackman, J.R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J.W. Lorsch (Ed.) Handbook of Organizational Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J.R. & Oldham, G.R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollenbeck, J.R., Ilgen, D.R., Sego, D.J., Hedlund, J., Major, D.A., & Phillips, J. (1995). Multilevel theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 292–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S.E., May, K.E. & Whitney, K. (1995). Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams. In Guzzo, R.A. & Salas, E. (Eds) Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R.G. & Klimoski, R.J. (1995). Staffing for effective group decision making: Key issues in matching people and teams. In Guzzo, R.A. & Salas, E. (Eds.) Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R. (1982). The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 81–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saavedra, R., Earley, P.C., & Van Dyne, L. (1993). Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. (1985). SAS user's guide: Statistics. Cary, N.C.: Author.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, R.G., Lindley, W.D. Issues in the Transition to Teams. Journal of Business and Psychology 13, 31–40 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022966915545

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022966915545

Keywords

  • Social Psychology
  • Team Member
  • Performance Improvement
  • General Factor
  • Social Issue