Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 227–229 | Cite as

Response: A Response to Blaxill, Baskin, and Spitzer on Croen et al. (2002), “The Changing Prevalence of Autism in California”

Commentary

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Croen, L. A., Grether, J. K., Hoogstrate, J., & Selvin, S. (2002). The changing prevalence of autism in California. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 207–215.Google Scholar
  2. Chakrabarti, S. & Fombonne, E. (2001). Pervasive developmental disorders in preschool children. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 3093–3099.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baird, G., Charman, T., Baron-Cohen, S., Cox, A., Swettenham, J., Wheelwright, S., Drew, A. (2000). A screening instrument for autism at 18 months of age: A 6-year follow-up study. Journal of the America Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 694–702.Google Scholar
  4. Bertrand, J., Mars, A., Boyle, C., Bove, F., Yeargin-Allsopp, M., Decoufle, P. (2001). Prevalence of autism in a United States population: The Brick Township, New Jersey, investigation. Pediatrics, 108, 1155–1161.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kaiser Permanente Division of ResearchOakland
  2. 2.California Department of Health ServicesEnvironmental Health Investigations BranchOakland

Personalised recommendations