Skip to main content
Log in

Interpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator to Help Clients in Understanding Their Strong Interest Inventory

  • Published:
Journal of Career Development

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Apostal, R. A. (1991). College students' career interests and sensing-intuition personality. Journal of College Student Development, 32, 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, N. E., Harmon, L. W., & Borgen, F. H. (1996). The relationship of self-efficacy for the Holland themes to gender, occupational group membership, and vocational interests. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 90–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgen, F. H. (1988). Review of the Strong Campbell Interest Inventory. In J. T. Kapes & M. M. Mastie (Eds.), A counselor's guide to career assessment instruments (2nd ed., pp. 121–126). Alexandria, VA: National Career Development Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, K. C., & Myers, I. B. (1962). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Form F. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. P., & Holland, J. L. (1972). A merger in vocational interest research. Applying Holland's theory to Strong data. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2, 353–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrey, A. L. (1983). An evaluation of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Academic Psychology Bulletin, 5, 115–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, M., & Weissman, S. (1987). Relationships between the Strong-Campbell and Myers-Briggs Instruments. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 20, 68–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, A. L., & Kummerow, J. M. (1996). Strong and MBTI career development guide (Rev. ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J. C., & Campbell, D. P. (1985). Manual for the SVIB-SCH (4th ed.) Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, L. W., Hansen, J. C., Borgen, F. H., & Hammer, A. L. (1994). Strong Interest Inventory: Applications and technical guide. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. L., Parker, C. P., & Dipboye, R. L. (1996). A comparison of competing models underlying responses to the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Career Assessment, 4, 99–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. (1926). Psychological types or the psychology of individuation. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaulley, M. H. (1990). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: A measure for individuals and groups. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22, 181–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I. B., & McCaulley, M. H. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research. (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkney, J. W. (1983). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator as an alternative in career counseling. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 62, 173–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittenger, D. J. (1993). The utility of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Review of Educational Research, 63, 467–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spokane, A. R (1991). Career Intervention. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B., & Ackerman, C. M. (1994). Review of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. In J. T. Kapes, M. M. Mastie, & E. A. Whitfield (Eds.), A counselor's guide to career assessment instruments (3rd ed., pp. 281–287). Alexandria, VA: National Career Development Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuell, B. D., & Beta, N. E. (1998). Relationships of career self-efficacy expectations to the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the Personal Styles Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 31, 10–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedeck, S. (1971). Problems with the use of “moderator” variables. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 295–310.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles C. Healy.

About this article

Cite this article

Healy, C.C. Interpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator to Help Clients in Understanding Their Strong Interest Inventory. Journal of Career Development 26, 295–308 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022954424166

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022954424166

Keywords

Navigation