Skip to main content
Log in

A Narrative Review of Post-1989 Employment Interview Research

  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This narrative review covers both selection- and recruitment/com-munication-oriented employment interview research published since 1989. Brief comparisons of older reviews' findings to recent findings are presented. Key topics reviewed include validity and reliability evidence, decision making in the interview, applicant characteristics, applicant reactions, and interview communication processes. Key findings of the present review include: interview validity, under certain conditions, may rival that of mental ability tests; more structure in selection interviews is better; previewing applicant information (e.g., resumes) by the interviewer can harm selection interview effectiveness; and certain recruiter behaviors can influence applicants' willingness to work for the firm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adkins, C. L., Russell, C. J., & Werbel, J. D. (1994). Judgments of fit in the selection process: The role of work value congruence. Personnel Psychology, 47, 605–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvey, R. D., & Campion, J. E. (1982). The employment interview: A summary and review of recent research. Personnel Psychology, 35, 281–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, A. E., Hollenbeck, J. R., Tower, S. L., & Phillips, J. M. (1994). The effects of interview focus on recruitment effectiveness: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 886–896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. K., & Campion, M. A. (1994). Biodata phenomenology: Recruiters' perceptions and use of biographical information in resume screening. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 897–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campion, M. A., Campion, J. E., & Hudson, J. P. (1994). Structured interviewing: A note on incremental validity and alternative question types. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 998–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campion, M. A., Palmer, D. K., & Campion, J. E. (in press). A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel Psychology.

  • Campion, M. A., Pursell, E. D., & Brown, B. K. (1988). Structured interviewing: Raising the psychometric properties of the employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 41, 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J. M., Jako, R. A., & Goodman, D. F. (1995). A meta-analysis of interrater and internal consistency reliability of selection interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 565–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalessio, A. T., & Silverhart, T. A. (1994). Combining biodata test and interview information: Predicting decisions and performance criteria. Personnel Psychology, 47, 303–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dipboye, R. L. (1982). Self-fulfilling prophecies in the selection-recruitment interview. Academy of Management Review, 7, 579–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, T. W., Turban, D. B., & Callender, J. C. (1994). Confirming first impressions in the employment interview: A field study of interviewer behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 659–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, D. C., & Ferris, G. R. (1989). The effects of applicant impression management tactics on interviewer judgments. Journal of Management, 15, 557–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, L. M., & Karren, R. J. (1993). Interviewer decision processes and effectiveness: An experimental policy-capturing investigation. Personnel Psychology, 45, 313–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, L. M., & Powell, G. N. (1988). An investigation of sex discrimination in recruiters' evaluations of actual applicants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, L. M., & Powell, G. N. (1995). The effect of sex similarity on recruiters' evaluations of actual applicants: A test of the similarity-attraction paradigm. Personnel Psychology, 48, 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakel, M. D. (1982). Similarity of post-interview trait rating intercorrelations as a contributor to interrater agreement in a structured employment interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 443–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. M. (1989). Reconsidering the employment interview: A review of recent literature and suggestions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 42, 691–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. M., & Fink, L. S. (1987). A field study of applicant reactions to employment opportunities: does the recruiter make a difference? Personnel Psychology, 40, 765–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Highhouse, S., & Bottrill, K. V. (1995). The influence of social (mis)information on memory for behavior in an employment interview. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(2), 220–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, A. (1986). College experiences and managerial performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 530–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffcutt, A. I., & Arthur, W. (1994). Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 184–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinicki, A. J., Lockwood, C. A., Hom, P. W., & Griffeth, R. W. (1990). Interviewer predictions of applicant qualifications and interviewer validity: Aggregate and individual analyses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 477–486.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latham, G. P., Saari, L. M., Pursell, E. D., & Campion, M. A. (1980). The situational interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 422–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R. C., Martin, C. L., & Parsons, C. K. (1993). Interviewer and applicant behaviors in employment interviews. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 372–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, T., Dobbins, G. H., & Farh, J. (1992). A field study of race and age similarity effects on interview ratings in conventional and situational interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 363–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macan, T. H., & Dipboye, R. L. (1990). The relationship of interviewers' preinterview impressions to selection and recruitment outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 43, 745–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, S. D., & Fay, C. (1988). Effects of situational interviews, conventional structured interviews, and training on interview rating agreement: An experimental analysis. Personnel Psychology, 41, 329–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, S. D., Howe, V., & Lee, T. W. (1992). Organizational recruiting as marketing management: An interdisciplinary study of engineering graduates. Personnel Psychology, 45, 807–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, E. C. (1964). The selection interview: A reevaluation of published research. Personnel Psychology, 17, 239–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., Whetzel, D. L., Schmidt, F. L., & Maurer, S. D. (1994). The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 599–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motowidlo, S. J., & Burnett, J. R. (1995). Aural and visual sources of validity in structured employment interviews. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61(3), 239–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motowidlo, S. J., Carter, G. W., Dunnette, M. D., Tippins, N., Werner, S., Burnett, J. R., & Vaughan, M. J. (1992). Studies of the structured behavioral interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 571–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olian, J. D., Schwab, D. P., & Haberfeld, Y. (1988). The impact of applicant gender compared to qualifications on hiring recommendations: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 180–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pingitore, R., Dugoni, B. L., Tindale, R. S., & Spring, B. (1994). Bias against overweight job applicants in a simulated employment interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 909–917.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N. (1991). Applicant reactions to the initial employment interview: Exploring theoretical and methodological issues. Personnel Psychology, 44, 67–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulakos, E. D., & Schmitt, N. (1995). Experience-based and situational interview questions: Studies of validity. Personnel Psychology, 48, 289–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulakos, E. D., Schmitt, N., Whitney, D., & Smith, M. (1996). Individual differences in interviewer ratings: The impact of standardization, consensus discussion, and sampling error on the validity of a structured interview. Personnel Psychology, 49, 85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pursell, E. D., Campion, M. A., & Gaylord, S. R. (1980). Structured interviewing: Avoiding selection problems. Personnel Journal, 59, 907–912.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rand, T. M., & Wexley, K. N. (1975). Demonstration of the effect ‘similar to me’ in simulated employment interviews. Psychological Reports, 36, 535–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynes, S. L. (1991). Recruitment, job choice, and post-hire consequences: A call for new research directions. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 2 (2nd ed., pp. 399–444). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynes, S. L., & Gerhart, B. (1990). Interviewer assessments of applicant “fit”: An exploratory investigation. Personnel Psychology, 43, 13–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N. (1976). Social and situational determinants of interview decisions: Implications for the employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 29, 79–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. S., & Bruhns, C. (1991). Relative effect of applicant work experience and academic qualification on selection interview decisions: A study of between-sample generalizability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 550–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smither, J. W., Reilly, R. R., Millsap, R. E., Pearlman, K., & Stoffey, R. W. (1993). Applicant reactions to selection procedures. Personnel Psychology, 46, 49–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springbett, B. M. (1958). Factors affecting the final decision in the employment interview. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 12, 13–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, C. K., & Kristof, A. L. (1995). Making the right impression: A field study of applicant impression management during job interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 587–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turban, D. B., & Dougherty, T. W. (1992). Influences of campus recruiting on applicant attraction to firms. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 739–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, L., & Trumbo, D. (1965). The selection interview since 1949. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 100–116.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. (1949). The employment interview: A critical summary. Personnel Psychology, 2, 17–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner, W. H., & Cronshaw, S. F. (1988). A meta-analytic investigation of the impact of interview format and degree of structure on the validity of the employment interview. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 275–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, O. R. (1969). Summary of research on the selection interview since 1964. Personnel Psychology, 22, 391–413.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jelf, G.S. A Narrative Review of Post-1989 Employment Interview Research. Journal of Business and Psychology 14, 25–58 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022954316857

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022954316857

Keywords

Navigation