Abstract
An awareness of how touch is employed in communicative interactions among peoples of different nations can be a critical requisite to effective inter-cultural communication. This study examined cross-sex, interpersonal, public touch to determine whether (1) the number of body areas touched varied between members of different societies; (2) the type of relationship between dyadic partners influenced tactile behavior; and (3) the amount of total body areas touched for each society correlated with latitude of origin. Variation in interpersonal touch as a function of nationality was confirmed. Results also confirmed that touch between dyads from an international sample was affected by type of relationship. Correspondence in the occurrence of tactile behavior among dyads from similar latitudes of origin was not confirmed. Findings call into question the designation of Northern European and U.S. cultures as non-contact.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Andersen, P. A., Lustig, M. W., & Andersen, J. F. (1987). Regional patterns of communication in the United States: A theoretical perspective. Communication Monographs, 54, 128–144.
Andersen, P. A., Lustig, M. W., & Andersen, J. F. (1988, June). Regional patterns of communication in the United States: Empirical tests. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
Andersen, P. A., Lustig, M. W., & Andersen, J. F. (1990). Changes in latitude, changes in attitude: The relationship between climate and interpersonal communication predispositions. Communication Quarterly, 38, 291–311.
Barnlund, D. C. (1989). Communicative styles of Japanese and Americans: Images and realities. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99–122.
Boissevain, J. (1974). Friends of friends: Networks, manipulators, and coalitions. New York: St. Martin's.
Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Woodall, W. G. (1989). Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue. New York: Harper & Row.
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
De Thomas, M. T. (1971). Touch power and the screen of loneliness. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 9, 112–118.
Dodd, C. H. (1987). Dynamics of intercultural communication. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
Emmers, T. M., & Dindia, K. (1995). The effect of relational stage and intimacy on touch: An extension of Guerrero and Andersen. Personal Relationships, 2, 225–236.
Fairbanks, J. K., Reischauer, E. O., & Craig, A. M. (1973). East Asia: Tradition and transformation. Boston: Houghton Miffin.
Frank, L. K. (1957). Tactile communication. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 56, 209–225.
Greenbaum, P. E., & Rosenfeld, H. M. (1980). Varieties of touching in greetings: Sequential structure and sex-related differences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 5, 13–25.
Guerrero, L. K., & Andersen, P. A. (1991). The waxing and waning of relational intimacy: Touch as a function of relational stage, gender, and touch avoidance. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 147–165.
Hall, E. T. (1966). A system of the notation of proxemic behavior. American Anthropologist, 65, 1003–1026.
Hall, E. T. (1990a). The hidden dimension. New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday. (Original work published 1966)
Hall, E. T. (1990b). The silent language. New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday, 1990. (Original work published 1959)
Harris, M. (1969). The rise of anthropological theory: A history of theories of culture. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
Hecht, M. L., Andersen, P. A., & Ribeau, S. A. (1989). The cultural dimensions of nonverbal communication. In M. K. Asante & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Handbook of international and intercultural communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Heslin, R., & Boss. D. (1980). Nonverbal intimacy in airport arrival and departure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 248–252.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Jandt, F. E. (1995). Intercultural communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Joe, W. J. (1972). Traditional Korea: A cultural history. Seoul, Korea: Chung'ang University Press.
Kim, K. (1977). Misunderstanding in nonverbal communication: America and Korea. Papers in Linguistics, 10, 1–22.
Knapp, M. L. (1972). Nonverbal communication in human interaction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Knapp, M. L. (1984). Interpersonal communication and human relationships. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Kras, E. S. (1989). Management in two cultures: Bridging the gap between U.S. and Mexican managers. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
Malandro, L. A., & Barker, L. (1983). Nonverbal communication. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Montagu, A. (1977). Touching: The human significance of the skin (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
Montagu, A. (1986). Touching: The human significance of the skin (3rd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
Morris, D. (1971). Intimate behaviour. New York: Random House.
Patterson, M. L. (1983). Nonverbal behavior. A functional perspective. NY: Springer-Verlag.
Ramsey, S. J. (1979). Nonverbal behavior: An intercultural perspective. In M. K. Asante, E. Newmark, & C. A. Blake (Eds.), Handbook of inter-cultural communication (pp. 105–143). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Rausch, P. B. (1990). Effect of tactile and kinesthetic stimulation on weight gain of premature infants. In K. E. Branard & T. B. Brazelton (Eds.), Touch: The foundation of experience (pp. 253–268). Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
Reite, M. (1990). Touch, attachment, and health: Is there a relationship. In K. E. Branard & T. B. Brazelton (Eds.), Touch: The foundation of experience (pp. 195–225). Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
Remland, M. S., Jones, T. S., & Brinkman, H. (1991). Proxemic and haptic behavior in three European countries. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 215–232.
Ronen, S., & Shenkar, O. (1985). Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: A review and synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 10, 435–454.
Ruch, W. V. (1989). International handbook of corporate communication. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
Shuter, R. (1976). Proxemics and tactility in Latin America. Journal of Communication, 26(3), 46–52.
Shuter, R. (1977). A field study of nonverbal communication in Germany, Italy, and the United States. Communication Monographs, 44, 289–305.
Thayer, S. (1986). Touch: Frontier of intimacy. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 10, 7–11.
Times atlas of the world. (1992). New York: Times Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McDaniel, E., Andersen, P.A. International Patterns of Interpersonal Tactile Communication: A Field Study. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 22, 59–75 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022952509743
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022952509743