Skip to main content
Log in

Does Operator Ordering Need Wormhole Dominance in the Wavefunction of the Universe?

  • Published:
General Relativity and Gravitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In dealing with the wavefunction of the universe there is a debate on the various proposals about the boundary condition of the wavefunction of the universe. At present we have three proposals, namely, the Hartle-Hawking proposal, the tunneling proposal and the Linde proposal. Recently it has been argued that the operator ambiguity factor has a decisive role in deciding the consequences of the various wavefunction at the zero scale factor region. In the present paper we discuss the role of operator ordering in the light of wormhole dominance proposal proposed by one of the authors and compare the results with that of others obtained earlier. We present an interpretation of operator ordering as a contribution of some sort of matter fields and discuss the role of complex path WKB analysis in avoiding the initial singularity and allowing us to incorporate the contribution of wormhole in the wavefunction of the universe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vilenkin, A. (1986). Phys. Rev. D 33, 3560.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Garriga, J., and Vilenkin, A. (1997). Phys. Rev. D 56, 2464.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Linde, A. D. (1984). Nuovo Cimento 39, 401.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Linde, A. D. (1998). Phys. Rev. D 58, 083514. gr-qc/9802038.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Biswas, S., Modak, B., and Biswas, D. (1996). Phys. Rev. D 55, 4673.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kontoleon, N., and Wiltshire, D. L. (1999). Phys. Rev. D 59, 063513.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vilenkin, A. (1998). Phys. Rev. D 58, 067301.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vilenkin, A. (1988). Phys. Rev. D 37, 888.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hawking, S. W., and Page, D. N. (1986). Nucl. Phys. B 264, 185.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Halliwell, J. J., and Myers, R. C. (1989). Phys. Rev. D 40, 4011.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klebanov, I., Susskind, L., and Banks, T. (1989). Nucl. Phys. B 317, 665.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Biswas, S., Shaw, A., Modak, B., and Biswas, D. (1999). Gen. Rel. Grav. 31, 1015.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Halliwell, J. J., and Myers, R. C. (1988). Phys. Rev. D 39, 2206.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lyons, G. W. (1992). Phys. Rev. D 46, 1546.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Unruh, W. G., and Jheeta, M. (1998), Preprint. gr-qc/9812017.

  16. Biswas, S., Guha, J., and Sarkar, N. G. (1995). Class. Quant. Grav. 12, 1591.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Biswas, S., Guha, J., and Sarkar, N. G. (1995). Class. Quant. Grav. 12, 1642.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Biswas, S., Shaw, A., Modak, B., and Biswas, D. (2000). Gen. Rel. Grav. 32, 2167.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gott, J. R. III, and Li, Li-Xin. (1999). Phys. Rev. D 58, 023501.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bousso, R., and Hawking, S. W. (1997). Phys. Rev. D 56, 2464.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mijic et al. (1989). Phys. Rev. D 39, 1496.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hawking, S. W., and Page, (1990). D. Phys. Rev. D 42, 2655.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biswas, S., Chowdhury, I. & Misra, P. Does Operator Ordering Need Wormhole Dominance in the Wavefunction of the Universe?. General Relativity and Gravitation 35, 545–566 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022949714959

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022949714959

Navigation