Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On Medicine as a Human Science

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

All the powerful influences exertedby the subjective-interpersonal dimension onthe organic or technical-functional dimensionof sickness and health do not make anintersubjective test concerning medicaltherapeutic results impossible. Theseinfluences are not arbitrary; on the contrary,they obey “laws” that are de facto sufficientlystable to allow predictions and explanationssimilar to those of experimental sciences.While, in this respect, the rules concerninghuman action are analogous to the scientificlaws of nature, they can at any time be revokedby becoming aware of them. Law-like andreproducible regularities in the sciences ofman are by no means separated from a patient'spersonal-hermeneutic mediation. This makes itpossible for human beings to modify, improve orsometimes even entirely (or better almostentirely) suspend these psychological,sociological, ethnological, medical,regularities. For this reason the sciences ofman including medicine are under the obligationof constantly inspecting the continuingvalidity of the rules on which theirpredictions and explanations are based, namelyby indirect, statistical methods. Thisrequires a synergistic collaboration ofextra-clinical and clinical tests through whichmedicine can obtain a good level ofintersubjective testability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Engelhardt Jr HT. Clinical problems and the concept of a disease. In Nordenfelt L, Lindahl B, Ingemar B, eds. Health, Disease, and Causal Explanation in Medicine. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1984, pp. 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fulford KWM. Praxis makes perfect. Illness as a bridge between biological concepts of disease and social conceptions of health. Theoretical Medicine 1993; 14: 305–320.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anschütz F. Geisteswissenschaftliche Grundlagen der modernen Medizin. In Beckmann JP, ed. Fragen und Probleme einer medizinischen Ethik. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1996, pp. 45–67.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fedoryka K. Health as a normative concept: Towards a new conceptual framework. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1997; 22: 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lanzerath D. Krankheit und ärztliches Handeln. Zur Funktion des Krankheitsbegriffs in der medizinischen Ethik. München: Alber, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wyss D. Erkranktes Leben - Kranker Leib. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck Ruprecht, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Doerr W, Schipperges H, eds. Was ist theoretische Pathologie? Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Christian P. Anthropologische Medizin. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bauer AW. Axiome des systematischen Erkenntnisgewinns in der Medizin. Internist 1997; 38: 299–306.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bauer AW. Axiome der Medizin. In Pieringer W, Ebner F, eds. Zur Philosophie der Medizin. Wien/New York: Springer, 2000, pp. 15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Uexküll T, Wesiak W. Theorie der Humanmedizin, 3. Aufl. München/Wien: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hahn P. Wissenschaft und Wissenschaftlichkeit in der Medizin. In Pieringer W, Ebner F, eds. Zur Philosophie der Medizin. Wien/New York: Springer, 2000, pp. 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pieringer W. Theorien und Methoden der Humanmedizin. In Pieringer W, Ebner F, eds. Zur Philosophie der Medizin. Wien/New York: Springer, 2000, pp. 55–88.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pieringer W, Fazekas Ch. Grundzüge einer theoretischen Pathologie. In Pieringer W, Ebner F, eds. Zur Philosophie der Medizin. Wien/New York: Springer, 2000, pp. 89–111.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gethmann CF, Heilen Können, Wissen. Zu den philosophischen Grundlagen der wissenschaftlichen Medizin. In Beckmann JP, ed. Fragen und Probleme einer medizinischen Ethik. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1996, pp. 68–93.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wesiak W. Die Medizin im Spannungsfeld von Pragmatismus Ideologie und Wissenschaft. In Pieringer W, Ebner F, eds. Zur Philosophie der Medizin. Wien/New York: Springer, 2000, pp. 205–215.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Engelhardt Jr HT. Typologies of disease: Nosologies revisited. In Schaffner KF, ed. Logic of Discovery and Diagnosis in Medicine. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: Univ. of California Press, 1985, pp. 56–71.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nordenfelt L. On the Nature of Health. An Action-theoretic Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Feyerabend PK. Ñber die Methode. In Radnitzky G, Andersson G, eds. Voraussetzungen und Grenzen der Wissenschaft. Tübingen: Mohr, 1981, pp. 175–253.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bateson G. Style, grace and information in primitive art. In Forge A, ed. The Study of Primitive Art. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Buzzoni M. Scienza e tecnica. teoria ed esperienza nelle scienze della natura. Studium: Roma, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Buzzoni, M. Erkenntnistheoretische und ontologische Probleme der theoretischen Begriffe. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 1997; 28: 19–53.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bunge M. Treatise on Basic Philosophy,Vol. 7Epistemology and Methodology III Philosophy of Science and Technology. Part II: Life Science, Social Science and Technology. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Radnitzky G. Psychoanalysis as research therapy and theory. Annals of Theoretical Psychology 1985; 3: 201–211.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rothschuh KE. Prinzipien der Medizin. Ein Wegweiser durch die Medizin. München: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Toulmin S. On the nature of physician's understanding. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1976; 1: 32–50.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Feinstein A. Clinical Judgment. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  28. McWhinney R. Medical knowledge and the rise of technology. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1978; 3: 293–304.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Leder D. Clinical interpretation: The hermeneutics of medicine. Theoretical Medicine 1990; 11: 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Polanyi M. Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gooding D. 'In Nature's School' Faraday as an experimentalist. In Gooding D, Frank AJL, eds. Faraday Rediscovered. Essays on the Life and Work of Michael Faraday 1791-1867. London: Macmillan, 1985, pp. 105–135.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Thomä H, Kächele H, Kübler JC. Zum Verhältnis von Theorie und Praxis der Psychoanalyse. Analyse und Kritik 1985; 7: 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bunge M. Scientific Research. II: The Search for Truth. New York: Springer, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wiesing U. Kunst oder Wissenschaft? Konzeptionen der Medizin in der deutschen Romantik. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kant I. Kritik der reinen Vernunft, inKant's Werke, Bd 3. Berlin: Rainer, 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Boorse C. Health as a theoretical concept. Philosophy of Science 1977; 44: 542–573.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Boorse C. A rebuttal on health. In Humber JM, Almeder RF, eds. What Is Disease? Totowa (NJ): Humana Press, 1997, pp. 1–134.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wright GH von. The Varieties of Goodness. New York: Humanities Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kass L. Regarding the end of medicine and the pursuit of health. The Public Interest 1975; 40: 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Canguilhem G. Le Normale et le pathologique. Paris: PUF, 1972 (Engl. transl. On the Normal and the Pathological. Reidel: Dordrecht, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Searle JR. The Construction of Social Reality. London: Penguin, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Veatch RM. The medical model: Its nature and problems. In Caplan AL, Engelhardt Jr HT, McCartney JJ, eds. Concepts of Health and Disease. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1973, pp. 523–544.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Schaefer H. Der Krankheitsbegriff. In Blohmke M, Ferber C von, Kisker KP, Schaefer H, eds. Sozialmedizin in der Praxis. Stuttgart: Enke, 1976, pp. 15–31.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nordenfelt L. Comments on Pörn's 'An Equilibrium Model of Health'. In Nordenfelt L et al., eds. Disease and Causal Explanation in Medicine. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1984, pp. 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wieland W. Philosophische aspekte des krankheitsbegriffs. In Becker V, Schipperges H, eds. Krankheitsbegriff, Krankheitsforschung, Krankheitswesen. Berlin: Springer, 1995, pp. 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Legrand M. Hypothèses pour une histoire de la psychanalyse. Dialectica 1975; 29: 189–207.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Merton RK. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Buzzoni M. Operazionismo ed ermeneutica. Saggio sullo statuto epistemologico della psicoanalisi. Milano: Angeli, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Buzzoni M. The operationalistic and hermeneutic status of psychoanalysis. The Journal for General Philosophy of Science 2001; 32: 131–165.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy and Human Sciences, University of Macerata, via Garibaldi 20, I-16100, Macerata, Italy

    Marco Buzzoni

Authors
  1. Marco Buzzoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buzzoni, M. On Medicine as a Human Science. Theor Med Bioeth 24, 79–94 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022942002711

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022942002711

Search

Navigation