Skip to main content
Log in

Ficus auriculata — its relative importance in Bhutan, farmers' preference and fodder quality

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tree leaves are important traditional fodder sources in many parts of the Himalaya, particularly during the dry winter season. Households interviewed in different regions of Bhutan used 1–13 different tree species for fodder, with Ficus auriculata standing out as the preferred and most widely used species across a range of conditions. It is preferred because of the wide range of adaptation, good nutritional qualities and palatability, and its good productivity. Ficus auriculata is also an important tree fodder in the Himalayan region of Nepal and India. Its fodder quality is far superior to paddy straw, the main winter fodder in the rice growing regions of the Himalayas. Parameters recorded in the literature for crude protein, neutral detergent fibre and acid detergent fiber are 9.5–17.3, 46.2–58.4 and 36.1–45.8%, respectively. Farmers consider it to be better than rice straw and the fodder from the tree fodder species Celtis tetrandra, Brassaiopsis hainla, Stereospermum suaveolens, Bauhinia purpurea and Litsea polyantha. Average annual fresh yield per tree was reported as 200, 120, 112, 108, 108 and 96 kg for F. auriculata, Artocarpus lakoocha, Gmelina arborea, F. cunia, Litsea monopetala and Stereospermum suaveolens, respectively. Considering the current importance of F. auriculata it is imperative to carry out research exploring its potential in evolving production systems and to quantify the opportunities of improving its nutritional quality and productivity through selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amatya B.M. 1990. Fodder Trees and Their Lopping Cycle in Nepal. Janmabhoomi Press, Kathmandu, 86 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grierson A.J.C. and Long D.G. 1983. Flora of Bhutan Including a Record of Plants from Sikkim. Volume 1, Part 1th edn. Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh, 186 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyeltshen T., Penjor T., Wangdi R. and Roder W. 1997. Tree fodder in subtropical regions of Bhutan. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual National Livestock Research Workshop, Bathplathang, Bumthang. RNR-RC Jakar, Bhutan, pp. 60–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi D.C. and Ludri R.S. 1966. The chemical composition and nutritive value of timla (Ficus roxburghii) and Kharik (Celtis tentreda) tree fodders. Indian Veterinary Journal 43: 833–837.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karki M.B. and Gold M.A. 1992. Evaluation of growth performance of ten commonly grown fodder tree species in central and western Nepal. Banko-Janakari 3(4): 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefroy E.C., Dann P.R., Wildin J.H., Wesley-Smith R.N. and McGowan A.A. 1992. Tress and shrubs as sources of fodder in Australia. Agorforestry Systems 20: 117–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen R.K., Schoeneberger M.M. and Aschmann S.G. 2000. An ecological foundation for temperate agroforestry. In: Garrett H.E., Rietveld W.J. and Fisher R.F. (eds), North American Agroforestry: An Integrated Science and Practice. ASA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 31–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panday K. 1982. Fodder Trees and Tree Fodder in Nepal. Sahayogi Prakashan, Tripureshawar, Kathmandu, Nepal, 107 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paudel K.C., Suwal M.R.S. and Adhikari B. 1997. Results of a Tree Fodder Elimination Trial at Community Managed Kharbari Land in the Low Hills of Western Nepal.Working-Paper-Lumle Agricultural Research Centre. No. 97- 64, 6 pp.

  • Pearson R.A. 1990. A note on live weight and intake and digestibility of food by draught cattle after supplementation of rice straw with the fodder tree Ficus auriculata. Animal Production 51: 635–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roder W. 1985. Fodder tree use in Bhutan. In: White L.D. and Tiedeman J.A. (eds), Proceeding of the International Rangelands Resources Development Symposium., Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, pp. 33–41.

  • Roder W. 1992. Experiences with tree fodder's in temperate regions of Bhutan. Agroforestry Systems 17: 263–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roder W. and Dorjee J. 1990. Research needs and priorities in the area of tree fodders. Tsenden 2: 45–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roder W., Wangdi K., Gyamtsho P. and Dorji K. 2001. Feeding the Herds - Improving Fodder Resources in Bhutan. ICIMOD, Kathmandu, 124 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh R.V. 1982. Fodder Trees of India. Oxford and IBH publishing CO, New Delhi, India, 663 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamang D.B. 1987. Nutrient composition of feed resources in Bhutan Bulleting No's I and II. Bhutan Journal of Animal Husbandry 10: 20–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne P.J., Subba D.B., Walker D.H., Thapa B., Wood C.D. and Sinclair F.L. 1999. The basis of indigenous knowledge of tree fodder quality and its implications for improving the use of tree fodder in developing countries. Animal Feed Science and Technology 81: 119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull J.W. and de la Cruz R.E. 1990. Tree technologies with potential to contribute to sustainability in marginal uplands of Southeast Asia. In: Blair G. and Lefroy R. (eds), Technologies for Sustainable Agriculture on Marginal Uplands in Southeast Asia, ACIAR Proceedings No. 33. Canberra, Australia, pp. 107–113.

  • Walker D.H., Thorne P.J., Sinclair F.L., Thapa B., Wood C.D. and Subba D.B. 2000. A systems approach to comparing indigenous and scientific knowledge: Consistency and discriminatory power of indigenous and laboratory assessment of the nutritive value of tree fodder. Agricultural Systems 62: 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roder, W., Rinzin & Gyeltshen, T. Ficus auriculata — its relative importance in Bhutan, farmers' preference and fodder quality. Agroforestry Systems 57, 11–17 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022940009857

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022940009857

Navigation