Advertisement

Journal of Child and Adolescent Group Therapy

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 115–134 | Cite as

Darth Vader vs. Superman: Aggression and Intimacy in Two Preadolescent Boys' Groups

  • David Braucher
Article
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

Group work reaches out to preadolescent boys with impulse and affect regulation problems by coinciding with their natural inclination toward peer relations and mastery. In group, boys recreate their peer culture and through the use of therapist interventions modify peer relationships into viable support networks. Collectively, they stimulate biological strivings for developmental maturity. The boys motivate each other to develop observing egos and alter problematic behavior. Boys growing up without fathers benefit from a safe environment where they can develop realistic masculine identities through their identification with group norms. Research shows that an identification with a benign masculine authority is the single most significant factor in a child developing affect regulation and socialization skills.

group boys preadolescence intimacy aggression 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bernstein, J. S. (1995). “Real men” don't talk: Attempting psychodynamic group therapy with inner-city boys. J. Child Adol. Group Therapy, 5(2), 83–106.Google Scholar
  2. Cath S. H., Gurwitt, A. R. & Ross, J. M. (Eds.) (1982). Father and child: Developmental and clinical perspectives. Boston, MA: Little Brown & Co.Google Scholar
  3. Drisko, J. W. (1992). Intimidation and projective identification in group therapy of physically abused early adolescent boys. J. Child Adol. Group Therapy, 2(1), 17–30.Google Scholar
  4. Garland, J. A. (1992). The establishment of individual and collective competency in children's groups as a prelude to entry into intimacy, disclosure, and bonding. Int. J. Group Psychother, 12(3), 395–405.Google Scholar
  5. Kahn, S. R. (1993). Reflections upon the functions of food in a children's psychotherapy group. J. Child Adol. Group Therapy, 3(3), 143–153.Google Scholar
  6. Pfeifer, G. (1993). Complementary cultures in children's psychotherapy groups: Conflict, coexistence, and convergence in group development. Int. J. Group Psychother., 42(3), 357–368.Google Scholar
  7. Pfeifer, G. (1993). The therapist's use of self and cultures in children's psychotherapy groups. J. Child Adol. Group Therapy, 3(2), 89–102.Google Scholar
  8. Sakurai, M. & Abrams, L. (1992). A world between realities: An exploration of therapeutic group culture and transitional phenomena in a long-term psychotherapy group. Int. J. Group Psychother., 42(3), 383–393.Google Scholar
  9. Schamess, G. (1992). Reflections on a developing body of group-as-a-whole theory for children's therapy groups: An introduction. Int. J. Group Psychother., 42(3), 351–356.Google Scholar
  10. Schamess, G. (1990). New direction in children's group therapy. Social Work with Groups, 3(1), 67–92.Google Scholar
  11. Schamess, G. (1976). Group treatment modalities for latency-age children. Int. J. Group Psychother., 26, 455–473.Google Scholar
  12. Slavson, S. R. (1945). Differential methods of group therapy in relation to age levels. In Reister, A. E. & Kraft I. A. (Eds.), Child group psychotherapy: Future tense, pp. 9–27. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  13. Slavson, S. R. (1943). An introduction to group therapy. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry, 13(4), 650–659.Google Scholar
  14. Soo, E. S. (1992). The management of resistance in the application of object relations concepts in children's and adolescents' group psychotherapy. J. Child Adol. Group Therapy, 2(2), 77–92.Google Scholar
  15. Spinner, D. (1992). The evolution of culture and cohesion in the group treatment of ego impaired children. Int. J. Group Psychother., 42(3), 369–381.Google Scholar
  16. Spinner, D. & Pfeifer, G. (1986). Group psychotherapy with ego impaired children: The significance of peer group culture in the evolution of a holding environment. Int. J. Group Psychother., 36(3), 427–446.Google Scholar
  17. Sugar, M. (1974). Interpretive group psychotherapy with latency children. American Academy of Child Psychiatry Journal of Child Psychiatry, 13(4), 648–666.Google Scholar
  18. Trafimow, E. & Pattak, S. I. (1981). Group psychotherapy and objectal development in children. Int. J. Group Psychother., 31(2), 193–204.Google Scholar
  19. Willock, B. (1990). From acting out to interactive play. Int. J. Psycho-Anal. 71, 321–334.Google Scholar
  20. Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Braucher
    • 1
  1. 1.Affiliated with the Jewish Board of Family and Children's ServicesBronx

Personalised recommendations