Skip to main content
Log in

Distributive Justice and Attitudes Toward the Welfare State

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current debates concerning the viability of the welfare state evoke the question of the social bases of support of the welfare state. Past research has documented fairly consistent relationships between sociodemographic characteristics and attitudes toward welfare policies. Yet, the nature of these relationships is not well understood. In the paper we argue that the level of support for the welfare state is largely determined by the principles of distributive justice espoused by individuals as well as their images of society. We develop a theoretical framework, which outlines the structural relationship between social attributes, principles of justice, perceived conflict, and support for the welfare state. Using data from a recent population survey on the legitimation of inequality, conducted in Israel in 1999 (N = 1057), we test a number of hypotheses. For the empirical analysis we use structural equation modeling with multiple indicators. Our findings reveal substantial support for policies aimed at reducing inequality. At the same time we find strong support for rewards according to merit and unequal earnings distribution. The impact of social attributes on attitudes toward the welfare state is partially mediated by the justice principles and images of society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alwin, D. F. (1992). Equity theory. In: Borgatta, E. F., and Borgatta, M. L. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Sociology, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J. L., and Wothke, W. (1999). AMOS user's guide 4.0, SmallWaters Corporation, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, J., and Shaw, W. (1978). Justice and Economic Distribution, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. R. (1996). Jihad vs. McWorld: How Globalism and Tribalism Are Shaping the World, Ballantine Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J., and Schokkaert, E. (1992). Interdisciplinary theory and research on justice. In: Scherer, K. R. (ed.), Justice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 237-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benabu, R. (2000). Meritocracy, redistribution, and the size of the pie. In: Arrow, K., Bowels, S., and Durlauf, S. (eds.), Meritocracy and Economic Inequality, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 317-339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Jr., Zelditch, M., Anderson, B., and Cohen, B. P. (1972). Structural aspects of distributive justice: A status value formulation. In: Berger, J. J., Zelditch, M., and Anderson, B. (eds.), Sociological Theories in Progress, Houghton-Mifflin, New York, pp. 119-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1998). End of Millennium, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Y., and Haberfeld, Y. (1998). Second generation Jewish immigrants in Israel: Have the ethnic gaps in schooling and earnings declined? Ethn. Racial Stud. 21: 507-528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespi, I. (1997). The Public Opinion Process: How the People Speak, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • d'Anjou, L., Steijn, A., and Van Aarsen, D. (1995). Social position, ideology and distributive justice. Soc. Justice Res. 8: 351-384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Fava, R. L. (1986). Toward an explication of the legitimation process. Soc. Forces 65: 476-500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edlund, J. (1999). Attitudes to income redistribution and taxation in social democratic and liberal welfare state regimes: A comparison between Sweden, Great Britain and the United States. In: Tos, N., Mohler, P., and Malner, B. (eds.), Modern Society and Values, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia, pp. 73-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (ed.) (1993). Changing Classes: Stratification and Mobility in Post-Industrial Societies, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. (1998). Is globalization the cause of the crisis of welfare states? In: EUI Working Paper, Florence, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flora, P., and Heidenheimer, A. J. (1987). The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America, Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1994). Beyond Left and Right, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, J. H., Yaish, M., and Kraus, V. (1997). Class mobility in Israeli society: A comparative perspective. Res. Strat. Soc. Mobil. 15: 3-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, A. (1999). Social Democracy and Welfare Capitalism, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. (1980). A new theory of distributive justice. Am. Sociol. Rev. 45: 3-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J., and Evans, M. D. R. (1993). The Legitimation of inequality. Am. J. Sociol. 99: 75-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J., and Evans, M. D. R. (1995). Class and class conflict in six Western nations. Am. Sociol. Rev. 60: 157-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J., and Evans, M. D. R. (1999). Public perceptions of class conflict in 21 nations. In: Tos, N., Mohler, P. P., and Malnar, B. (eds.), Modern Society and Values, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia, pp. 43-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, H. H. (1994). The Transformation of Social Democracy, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluegel, J. R., and Miyano, M. (1995). Justice beliefs and support for the welfare state in advanced capitalism. In: Klugel, J. R., Mason, D., and Wegener, B. (eds.), Social Justice and Political Change: Public Opinion in Capitalist and Post-Socialist Countries, Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp. 81-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, W. (2000). Faces of inequality: Gender, class, and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states. Soc. Polit. 7: 127-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuechler, M. (1998). The survey method: An indispensable tool for social science research everywhere? Am. Behav. Sci. 42: 178-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (1986). A crisis in stratification theory? Persons, households/families/lineages, genders, classes and nations. In: Crompton, R., and Mann, M. (eds.), Gender and Stratification, Polity Press, Cambridge, pp. 40-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmur, A. (2000). The intrinsic value of economic equality. In: M. Mautner (ed.), Israel, Ramot, Tel-Aviv, pp. 51-65. (Hebrew)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and Social Class, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruyama, G. M. (1998). Basics of Structural Equation Modeling, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1992). Distributive justice: What the people think. Ethics 102: 555-593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1999). Principles of Social Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorehouse, H. F. (1976). Attitudes to class and class relationships in Britain. Sociology 10: 469-496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orloff, A. S. (1996). Gender in the welfare state. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 22: 51-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (1988). The patriarchal welfare state. In: Gutman, A. (ed.), Democracy and the Welfare State, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 231-260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, U. (2000). The promised land of business opportunities: Liberal post-Zionism in the glocal age. In: Shafir, G., and Peled, Y. (eds.), The New Israel: Peacemaking and Liberalization, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 217-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzman, R. L., and Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (1992). Life chances and support for equality and equity normative and counter normative distribution rules. Soc. Forces 70: 745-763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. V., and Bell, W. (1978). Equality, success and social justice in England and the United States. Am. Sociol. Rev. 43: 125-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roller, E. (1995). The welfare state: The equality dimension. In: Borre, O., and Scarbrough, E. (eds.), The Scope of Government, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 165-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozenhek, Z. (1998). Policy paradigms and the dynamics of the welfare state: The Israeli welfare state and the Zionist colonial project. Int. J. Sociol. Soc. Policy 18: 157-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozenhek, Z. (in press). Social policy and state-building: The dynamics of the Israeli welfare state. In: Aspalter, C. (ed.), West–East Comparison of Welfare States, Nova Science, New York.

  • Sainsbury, D. (1996). Gender Equality and Welfare States, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2000). Merit and justice. In: Arrow, K., Bowels, S., and Durlauf, S. (eds.), Meritocracy and Economic Inequality, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 5-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafir, G., and Peled, Y. (2000). The New Israel: Peacemaking and Liberalization, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalev, M. (2000). Workers, state and crisis: The Israeli economy. In: U. Ram (ed.), The Israeli Society: Critical Aspects, Brerot, Tel-Aviv, pp. 148-171. (Hebrew)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepelak, N. J. (1989). Ideological stratification: American beliefs about economic justice. Soc. Justice Res. 3: 217-231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (1996). The Retreat of the State, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svallfors, S. (1997). Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution: A comparison of eight western countries. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 13: 283-304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, A., Marshall, G., Burgoyne, C., and Routh, D. (1995). Distributive justice: Does it matter what the people think? In: Kluegel, J. R., Mason, D. S., and Wegener, B. (eds.), Social Justice and Political Change, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 15-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swirsky, S., and Atkin, A. (2001). Community of Residence and Level of Earning, Adva Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wearness, K. (1987). On the rationality of caring. In: Showstack Sasson, A. (ed.), Women and the State, Hutchinson, London, pp. 207-234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, H. (1975). The Welfare State and Equality, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. (1958). The Rise of Meritocracy, 1870–2033, Thames and Hudson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagorski, K. (1999). Egalitarianism, perception of conflicts and support for transformation in Poland. In: Svallfors, S., and Taylor-Gooby, P. (eds.), The End of the Welfare State? Responses to State Retrenchment, Routledge, New York, pp. 190-217.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noah Lewin-Epstein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewin-Epstein, N., Kaplan, A. & Levanon, A. Distributive Justice and Attitudes Toward the Welfare State. Social Justice Research 16, 1–27 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022909726114

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022909726114

Navigation