Skip to main content
Log in

Context and Interpretation: An Archaeology of Cultural Production

  • Published:
International Journal of Historical Archaeology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the construction of modern-world contexts in historical archaeology. To help draw out and understand the social and cultural contexts of capitalism, colonialism, and modernity, and how they may be materially understood, an explanation of the German history of everyday life school (Alltagsgeschichte) is presented. In this approach, the objects of historical study become the everyday cultural interpretations of past people and how these interpretations actively produced and reproduced cultures. This approach is illustrated by a landscape archaeology of the Bordley–Randall site in Annapolis, Maryland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES CITED

  • Abrams, P. (1980). History, sociology, and historical sociology. Past and Present 87: 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, Monthly Review Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaudry, M. C. (1990). Review of The Recovery of Meaning: Historical Archaeology in the Eastern United States, Leone, M. P., and Potter, P. B., Jr. (eds.). Historical Archaeology 24(3): 115–118.

  • Beaudry, M. C. (1996). Reinventing Historical Archaeology. In De Cunzo, L. A., and Herman, B. L. (eds.), Historical Archaeology and the Study of American Culture, Henry Francis du Pont Winterthur Museum, Winterthur, DE, pp. 473–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaudry, M. C., Cook, L. J., and Mrozowski, S. A. (1991). Artifacts and Active Voices: Material Culture as Social Discourse. In McGuire, R. H., and Paynter, R. (eds.), The Archaeology of Inequality, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 150–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermingham, A. (1994). System, order, and abstraction: The politics of English landscape drawing around 1795. In Mitchell, W. J. T. (ed.), Landscape and Power, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 77–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bintliff, J. (ed.) (1991). The Annales School and Archaeology, New York University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of A Theory of Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, F. (1979). Civilization and Capitalism, 15th–18th Centuries (Reynolds, S., trans.), Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, G. L. (1980). Baltimore in the Nation, 1789–1861. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, B. S. (1980). Anthropology and history: The state of the play. Comparative Studies in Society and History 22: 198–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, B. S. (1981). Anthropology and history in the 1980s: Toward a rapproachment. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 12(2): 227–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, N. Z. (1981). Anthropology and history in the 1980s: The possibilities of the past. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 12(2): 267–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deagan, K. A. (1988). Neither history nor prehistory: The questions that count in historical archaeology. Historical Archaeology 22(1): 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cunzo, L. A. (1996). Introduction: People, material culture, context, and culture in historical archaeology. In De Cunzo, L. A., and Herman, B. L. (eds.), Historical Archaeology and the Study of American Culture. Henry Francis du Pont Winterthur Museum, Winterthur, DE, pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, N. B., Eley, G., and Ortner S. B. (eds.) (1994). Culture/Power/History: A Reader in Contemporary Social Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, T. (1996). The Illusions of Postmodernism, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, B. (1985). Slavery and Freedom on the Middle Ground: Maryland During the Nineteenth Century, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, K. (1972). The cultural evolution of civilizations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 3: 339–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gailey, C. W., and Patterson, T. C. (1988). State formation and uneven development. In Bender, B., Gledhill, J., and Larsen, M. (eds.), State and Society: The Emergence and Development of Social Hierarchy and Political Centralisation, George Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genovese, E. (1965). The Political Economy of Slavery: Studies in the Economy and Society of the South, Vintage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, D. (1982). Regional Transformation and Industrial Revolution: A Geography of the Yorkshire Woollen Industry, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, S., and Prude, J., (eds.) (1985). The Countryside in the Age of Capitalist Transformation: Essays in the Social History of Rural America, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. (1979). Cultural Materialism: The Struggle for a Science of Culture, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, B. L. (1996). Introduction: Historical archaeology and the search for context. In De Cunzo, L. A., and Herman, B. L. (eds.), Historical Archaeology and the Study of American Culture. Henry Francis du Pont Winterthur Museum, Winterthur, DE, pp. 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1991). Interpretive archaeology and its role. American Antiquity 56: 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulikoff, A. (1986). Tobacco and Slaves: The Development of the Southern Cultures in the Chesapeake, 1680–1800, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, M. P. (1995). A historical archaeology of capitalism. American Anthropologist 97: 251–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, M. P., and Potter, P. B., Jr. (1988). Introduction: Issues in historical archaeology. In The Recovery of Meaning: Historical Archaeology in the Eastern United States, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, M. P., and Potter, P. B., Jr. (1994). Historical archaeology of capitalism. Bulletin of the Society for American Archaeology 12(4): 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, M. P., Potter, P. B., Jr., and Shackel, P. A. (1987). Toward a critical archaeology. Current Anthropology 28: 283–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, B. J. (1994). People with history: An update on historical archaeology in the United States. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1: 5–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüdkte, A. (1995a). Introduction: What is the history of everyday life and who are its practitioners? In Lüdkte, A. (ed.), The History of Everyday Life: Reconstructing Historical Experiences and Ways of Life, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 3–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüdkte, A. (ed.) (1995b). The History of Everyday Life: Reconstructing Historical Experiences and Ways of Life, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, C. N. (1996). “It is Quietly Chaotic. It Confuses Time”: Final Report of Excavations at the Bordley-Randall Site in Annapolis, Maryland, 1993–1995. Unpublished ms. on file, Archaeology in Annapolis, Historic Annapolis Foundation/University of Maryland, College Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, C. N. (1998). Annapolis and the Making of the Modern landscape: An Archaeology of History and Tradition, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Columbia University, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medick, H. (1995). “Missionaries in the rowboat”?: Ethnological ways of knowing as a challenge to social history. In Lüdkte, A. (ed.), The History of Everyday Life: Reconstructing Historical Experiences and Ways of Life, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 41–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medick, H., and Sabean, D. (eds.) (1984). Interest and Emotion: Essays in the Study of Family and Kinship, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, L. E. (1995). Letter to the Editor. Bulletin of the Society for American Archaeology 13(1): 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, P. R. (1998). Expanding archaeological discourse: Ideology, metaphor, and critical theory in historical archaeology. In Shackel, P. A., Mullins, P. R., and Warner M. S. (eds.), Annapolis Pasts: Historical Archaeology in Annapolis, Maryland, University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, pp. 7–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, W. B. (1925). Annapolis, Its Colonial and Naval Story, Thomas Y. Crowell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, J., and Roseberry, W. (eds.) (1991). Golden Ages, Dark Ages, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orser, C. E., Jr. (1996). A Historical Archaeology of the Modern World, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papenfuse, E. C. (1975). In Pursuit of Profit: The Annapolis Merchants in the Era of the American Revolution, 1763–1805, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paynter, R., and McGuire, R. H. (1991). The archaeology of inequality: Material culture, domination, and resistance. In McGuire, R. H., and Paynter, R. (eds.), The Archaeology of Inequality, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, P. B., Jr. (1992). Critical archaeology: In the ground and on the street. In Little, B. J., and Shackel, P. A. (eds.), Meanings and Uses of Material Culture. Historical Archaeology 26(2): 117–129.

  • Potter, P. B., Jr. (1994). Public Archaeology in Annapolis: A Critical Approach to History in Maryland's Ancient City, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preucel, R., and Hodder, I. (1996). Material symbols. In Preucel, R., and Hodder, I. (eds.), Contemporary Archaeology in Theory, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 299–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, A. (1830–1881). Alexander Randall Diaries, 12 vols. Ms. 652, Maryland Historical Society, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, E. S. (1887). “The Ancient City”: A History of Annapolis, in Maryland, 1649–1887, Record Printing Office, Annapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roseberry, W. (1989). Anthropologies and Histories: Essays in Culture, History, and Political Economy, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuyler, R. L. (1988). Archaeological remains, documents, and anthropology: A call for a new culture history. Historical Archaeology 22(1): 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackel, P. A. (1993). Personal Discipline and Material Culture: An Archaeology of Annapolis, Maryland, 1695–1870, University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackel, P. A. (1996). Culture Change and the New Technology: An Archaeology of the Early American Industrial Era, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackel, P. A., and Little, B. J. (1992). Post-processual approaches to meanings and uses of material culture in historical archaeology. In Little, B. J., and Shackel, P. A. (eds.), Meanings and Uses of Material Culture. Historical Archaeology 26(2): 5–11.

  • Shanks, M., and Tilley, C. (1987). Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sider, G. M. (1986). Culture and Class in Anthropology and History: A Newfoundland Illustration, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sider, G., and Smith, G. (eds.) (1997). Between History and Histories: The Making of Silences and Commemorations, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. (1997). Pandora's history: Central Peruvian peasants and the re-covering of the past. In Sider, G., and Smith, G. (eds.), Between History and Histories: The Making of Silences and Commemorations, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp. 80–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, W. O. (1937). Annapolis: Anne Arundel's Town. Dood, Mead, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stilgoe, J. R. (1988). Borderland: Origins of the American Suburb, 1820–1939, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taussig, M. (1991). Tactility and distraction. Cultural Anthropology 6(2): 147–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. P. (1978). The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays, Monthly Review Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurmon, M. D. (1996). Review of A Historical Archaeology of the Modern World by C. E. Orser. Historical Archaeology 30(3): 87–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and Literature, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, E. (1982). Europe and the People without History, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zierden, M. (1996). The urban landscape, the work yard, and archaeological site formation processes in Charleston, South Carolina. In De Cunzo, L. A., and Herman, B. L. (eds.), Historical Archaeology and the Study of American Culture, Henry Francis du Pont Winterthur Museum, Winterthur, DE, pp. 285–317.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matthews, C.N. Context and Interpretation: An Archaeology of Cultural Production. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 3, 261–282 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022898509184

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022898509184

Navigation