Skip to main content
Log in

Variability and relationships among 12-hour IVDMD, starch, oil, protein, and physical characteristics of 16 sorghum conversion lines

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A factor frequently identified as a key to understanding sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench feed value to ruminant animals is rate of starch digestion. Recent research in corn (Zea mays L.) has established a strong ability to predict rumen starch degradation from grain physical and chemical parameters. It was therefore important to determine whether similar relationships could be established in sorghum. The objectives of this study were to determine: 1) range of variation for12-hour in vitro dry matter disappearance (IVDMD), chemical, and physical grain quality parameters among 16sorghum conversion lines; and 2) to establish the strength of the relationships of these characters. Entries were grown at Ithaca, Nebraska in 1991 and 1992 in a randomized complete block with four replications. Line effects were significant for 12-hour IVMVD, crude protein, oil, starch, individual seed weight, and hardness. The only traits significantly correlated with 12-hour IVDMD were crude protein and hardness, with r≤–0.32 for testa and non-testa-containing lines. Stepwise regression similarly revealed poor predictive ability for any of the traits on12-hour IVDMD. Unlike corn, prediction of digestibility from simply measured physical parameters was not possible in this set of16 sorghum lines. However, the lack of strong relationships provides opportunity to select lines with unique combinations of traits for individual targeted needs or markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beta, T., A.B. Obilana & H. Corke, 2001. Genetic diversity in properties of starch from Zimbabwean sorghum landraces. Cereal Chem 78: 583-589.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bramel-Cox, P.J., M.A. Lauver & M.E. Witt, 1990. Potential gain from selection in grain sorghum for higher protein digestibility. Crop Sci 30: 521-524.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, Joe D., 2000. Value of sorghum and sorghum co-products in diets for livestock. In: C.W. Smith & R.A Frederiksen (Eds.), Sorghum: Origin, History, Technology, and Production, pp. 731-749. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotarski, S.F., R.D. Waniska & K.K. Thurn, 1992. Starch hydrolysis by the ruminal microflora. J Nutr 122: 178-190.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, F.R., 1974. Characterization of seed size in sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Ph.D. diss. Texas A & M University, College Station, TX (Diss. Abstr. 75-15049).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, J.F., C.R. Martin, F.C. Felker & J.L. Steele, 1996. Application of single kernel wheat characterization technology to sorghum grain. Cereal Chem 73: 421-423.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, J.F., Milton, T. & R.A. Mass, 2000. A 12 hour in vitro procedure for sorghum grain feed quality assessment. Crop Sci 40: 204-208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philippeau, C., F. Le Deschault de Monredon & B. Michalet-Doreau, 1999. Relationship between ruminal starch degradation and the physical characteristics of corn grain. J Anim Sci 77: 238-243.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, C.J., J.F. Pedersen, R.A. Britton, R.A. Stock, D.H. Shain & C.R. Krehbiel, 1995. In vitro disappearance procedure modifications. Anim Feed Sci Technol 55: 35-45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, 1990. SAS/STAT users guide. Version 6, 4th ed. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniffen, C.J., J.D. O'Connor, P.J. Van Soest, D.G. Fox & J.B. Russel, 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. J Anim Sci 70: 3562-3577.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture, 2001. National Plant Germplasm System. Available on-line at http: //www.arsgrin.gov/npgs/).

  • Wall, Joseph S. & Charles W. Blessin, 1970. Composition of sorghum plant and grain. In: J.S. Wall & W.M. Ross (Eds.), Sorghum Production and Utilization, pp. 118-166. AVI Publishing Co., Inc., Westport, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waniska, Ralph D. & Lloyd W. Rooney, 2000. Structure and chemistry of the sorghum caryopsis. In: C.W. Smith & R.A. Frederiksen (Eds.), Sorghum: Origin, History, Technology, and Production, pp. 649-688. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wester, T.J., S.M. Gramlich, R.A. Britton & R.A. Stock 1992. Effect of grain sorghum hybrid on in vitro rate of starch disappearance and finishing performance of ruminants. J Anim Sci 70: 2866-2876.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wills, R.B.H. & M.R. Ali, 1982. Effect of grain size on dehulling of sorghum. Cereal Chem 60: 12-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, Y., S.J. Bartle & R.L. Preston, 1990. Improved enzymatic method to measure processing effects and starch availability in sorghum grain. J Anim Sci 68: 3861-3870.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pedersen, J.F., Kofoid, K.D. Variability and relationships among 12-hour IVDMD, starch, oil, protein, and physical characteristics of 16 sorghum conversion lines. Euphytica 130, 261–266 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022895326626

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022895326626

Navigation