Skip to main content
Log in

Linear and Nonlinear Aerodynamic Theory of Interaction between Flexible Long Structure and Wind

  • Published:
Applied Mathematics and Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In light of the characteristics of the interactions between flexible structure and wind in three directions, and based on the rational mechanical section-model of structure, a new aerodynamic force model is accepted, i. e. the coefficients of three component forces are the functions of the instantaneous attack angle and rotational speed Ci = Ci(β(t), Θ), (i = D, L, M). So, a new method to formulate the linear and nonlinear aerodynamic items of wind and structure interacting has been put forward in accordance with “strip theory” and modified “quasi-static theory”, and then the linear and nonlinear coupled theory of super-slender structure for civil engineering analyzing are converged in one model. For the linear aerodynamic-force parts, the semi-analytical expressions of the items so-called “flutter derivatives” corresponding to the one in the classic equations have been given here, and so have the nonlinear parts. The study of the stability of nonlinear aerodynamic-coupled torsional vibration of the old Tacoma bridge shows that the form and results of the nonlinear control equation in rotational direction are in agreement with that of V. F. Böhm's.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scanlan R H, Tomko J J. Airfoil and bridge deck flutter derivatives [J]. J Eng Mech, ASCE, 1971,97(EM6):1717–1737.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Scanlan R H. The action of flexible bridges under wind (I) flutter theory [J]. J Sound Vibration, 1978,60(2):187–199.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lin Y K. Motion of suspension bridges in turbulent winds [J]. J Eng Mech, ASCE,1979,105(EM6): 921–923.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lin Y K, Ariaratnam S T. Stability of bridge motion in turbulent winds [J]. J Struct Mech,1980, 8(1):1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Scanlan R H. The action of flexible bridge under wind (II) buffeting theory [J]. J Sound Vibration, 1978,60(2):201–211.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davenport A G. The response of slender, line-like structures to a gusty wind [J]. Proceedings ICE,1962,23:389–407.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Scanlan R H. Interpreting aeroelastic models of cable-stayed bridges [J]. J Eng Mech, ASCE, 1987,113(4):555–575.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sarkar P P, et al. Identification of aeroelastic parameters of flexible bridges [J]. J Eng Mech, ASCE, 1994,120(8):1718–1742.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Piccardo G. A methodology for the study of coupled aeroelastic phenomena [J]. J Wind Eng Indus Aerodynamic, 1993,48:241–252.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Solari G. Gust-Excited Vibrations [M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Strømmen E, Hiorth-Hansen E. The buffeting wind loading of structural members at an arbitrary attitude in the flow [J]. J Wind Eng Indus Aerodynamic,1995,56:267–290.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brito J L V, Riera J D. Aerodynamic instability of cylindrical bluff bodies in non-homogeneous flow [J]. J Wind Eng Indus Aerodynamic,1995,57,81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Parkinson G V, Brooks N P H. On the aeroelastic instability of bluff cylinders [J]. J Appl Mech, 1961,83:250–258.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Novak M. Aeroelastic galloping of rigid and elastic bodies [R]. Univ Western Ontorio, London/Canada, Res Rep BLWT–3–68,1968.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Böhm V F. Berechnugn nichtlinearer aerodynamisch erregter schwingungen von Hangebrucken [J]. Der Stahlbau,1967,7:207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Falco M, Curami A, Zasso A. Nonlinear effects in sectional model aeroelastic parameters [J]. J Wind Eng Indus Aerodynamic, 1992,41–44:1321–1332.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Diana G, Cheli F, Resta F. Time domain aeroelastic force identification on bridge decks [A]. In: 9th International Conference of Wind Engineering [C]. New Delhi, India, 1995,938–949.

  18. Borri C, Höffer R, Zahlten W. A nonlinear approach for evaluating simultaneous buffeting and aeroelastic effects on bridge decks [A]. In: 9th International Conference of Wind Engineering [C]. New Delhi, India, 1995, 839–850.

  19. Steinmann D G, Hangebrücken-Das aerodynamische problem und seine lösung [J]. Acier-Steel-Stahl, 1954,19(10–11):495,542.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Scanlan R H, Jones N P, Singh L. Inter-relation among flutter derivatives [J]. J Wind Eng Indus Aerodynamic, 1997,69–71:829–837.

    Google Scholar 

  21. XU Xu, CAO Zhi-yuan. New expressions of nonlinear aerodynamic forces in civil engineering [A]. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Int Conf on Nonlinear Mech(ICNM-III) [C]. Shanghai University Press Shanghai, Aug, 1998, 396–401.

    Google Scholar 

  22. XU Xu, CAO Zhi-yuan. Stability analysis of nonlinear aerodynamic-coupled torsional vibration [J]. Journal of Nonlinear Dynamics in Science and Technology, 1999, 6 3: 228–234. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, X., Cao, Zy. Linear and Nonlinear Aerodynamic Theory of Interaction between Flexible Long Structure and Wind. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics 22, 1446–1457 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022895028953

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022895028953

Navigation