Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Male Partners' Role in Latinas' Amniocentesis Decisions

  • Published:
Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract

There has been relatively little research on men's experiences with fetal diagnosis or their role in their female partners' decisions about whether to be tested. This issue may be of particular salience in the delivery of genetic services to Latino groups, where it is often assumed that lower rates of genetic service utilization are linked to men's refusal to allow their wives to be tested. Here we present data from a multimethod study on the use of amniocentesis by Mexican-origin women in Southern California. We focus on the role male partners played in the women's amniocentesis decisions. Contrary to expectation, we found that women made the majority of the decisions about amniocentesis, although their partners' presence at the genetic consultation where the amniocentesis was offered proved an important predictive factor in amniocentesis uptake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adams MM, Weis P, Oakley GP Jr, Falek A (1984) Use of prenatal diagnosis among parents of infants with spina bifida in Atlanta, Georgia, 1976-1979. Am J Obstet Gynecol 148(6):749-751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler B, Kushnick T (1982) Genetic counseling in prenatally diagnosed Trisomy 18 and 21: Psychosocial aspects. Pediatrics 69(1):94-99.

    Google Scholar 

  • ACOOG (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists) (1985) Professional liability implications of AFP tests. DPL Alert.

  • Beeson D, Golbus MS (1985) Decision making: Whether or not to have prenatal diagnosis and abortion for X-linked conditions. Am J Med Genet 20(1):107-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benacerraf BR (1993) Should patients with elevated levels of maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein always undergo amniocentesis? Radiology 188(1):17-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard H. Russell (1995) Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop J, Huether CA, Torfs C, Lorey F, Deddens J (1997) Epidemiologic study of Down syndrome in a racially diverse California population, 1989-91. Am J Epidemiol 145(2):134-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browner CH (1979) Abortion decision-making: Some findings from Colombia. Stud Fam Plan 10:96-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browner CH (1986) The politics of reproduction in a Mexican village. Signs 11(4):710-724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browner CH (1996) Household politics and reproductive decisions. Presented in symposium “New Directions in Latin American Medical Anthropology.” Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, San Francisco.

  • Browner CH, Preloran HM (in press) Para sacarse la espina (To get rid of the doubt): Mexican immigrant couples and amniocentesis. In: Sætnan A, Oudshoorn N, Kirejczyk M (eds) Localizing and Globalizing Reproductive Technologies. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

  • Browner CH, Press N (1995) The normalization of prenatal diagnostic screening. In: Ginsburg F, Rapp R (eds) Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 307-322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton BK, Dillard RG, Clark EN (1985) The psychological impact of false positive elevations of maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein. Am J Obstet Gynecology 151(1):77-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • CDHS (California Department of Health Services) (1995) Vital Statistics of California, 1994.

  • CDHS (California Department of Health Services) (1998) Expanded AFP Screening Program Update, September, 1998.

  • CDHS (California Department of Health Services) (n.d.) The California Expanded Alpha-Fetoprotein Screening Program Prenatal Care Provider Handbook. Berkeley, CA: Genetic Disease Branch.

  • Clark SL, DeVore GR (1989) Prenatal diagnosis for couples who would not consider abortion. Obstet Gynecol 73(6):1035-1037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall BF, Robertson RD, Lebherz TB, King W, Schroth PC (1983) Maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein screening for the detection of neural tube defects. West J Med 138(4):524-530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham GC (1998) An Evaluation of California's Public-Private Maternal Serum Screening Program. Ninth International Conference on Prenatal Diagnosis and Therapy, Los Angeles, CA.

  • D'Amico R, Jacopini G, Vivona G, Frontali M (1992) Reproductive choices in couples at risk for genetic disease: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. Birth Defects: Orig Artic Ser 28(1):41-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkins TE, Stovall TG, Wilroy S, Dacus JV (1986) Attitudes of mothers of children with Downsyndrome concerning amniocentesis, abortion, and prenatal genetic counseling techniques. Obstet Gynecol 68(2):181-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans MI, Belsky RL, Clementino NA, Shlagor P, Breiger G, Koppitch FC III, Syner FN, Rodriguez SE, Sokol RJ (1987) Establishment of a collaborative university-commercial maternal serum alphafetoprotein screening program: A model for a tertiary center outreach. Am J of Obstet Gynecol 156(6):1441-1449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feohrenbach L, Lane RC (1990) A commonsense approach to treatment of adolescents. J Contemp Psychother 20(1):35-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frets PG, Duivenvoorden HJ, Verhage F, Peters-Romeyn BM, Niermeijer MF (1991) Analysis of problems in making the reproductive decision after genetic counseling. J Med Genet 28(3):194-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia C (1995) Clinical Coordinator, UCLA Prenatal Diagnostic Center. Division of Medical Genetics. Los Angeles, CA. Personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green J (1990) Calming or Harming? A Critical Review of Psychological Effects of Fetal Diagnosis on Pregnant Women. Galton Institute Occasional Papers, Second Series, No. 2.

  • Greenberg F (1988) The impact of MSAFP screening on genetic services, 1984-1986. Am J Med Genet 31(1):223-230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobus I, Frets PG, Duivenvoorden HJ, Tibboel D, Niermeijer MF (1995) Factors influencing whether or not couples seek genetic counseling: An explorative study in a pediatric surgical unit. Clin Genet 47(1):47-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson KA, Kerzin-Storrar L, Watters EA, Harris R (1990) Adult polycystic kidney disease: Knowledge, experience, and attitudes to prenatal diagnosis. J Med Genet 27(9):552-558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolker A, Burke BM (1987) Amniocentesis and the social construction of pregnancy. Marr Fam Rev 11(3-4):95-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolker A, Burke BM (1994) Prenatal Testing: A Sociological Perspective. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuppermann M, Gates E, Washington AE (1996) Racial-ethnic differences in prenatal diagnostic test use and outcomes: Preferences, socioeconomics, or patient knowledge? Obstet Gynecol, 87 (5 Pt 1):675-682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubs ML (1979) Does genetic counseling influence risk attitudes and decision making? Birth Defects Orig Arctic Ser 15(SC):355-367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macri JN, Anderson RW, Krantz DA, Larsen JW, Buchanan PD (1996) Prenatal maternal dried blood screening with alpha-fetoprotein and free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin for open neural tube defect and Down syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174(2):566-572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marfatia L, Punales-Morejon D, Rapp R (1990) Counseling the underserved: When an old reproductive technology becomes a new reproductive technology. Birth Defects Orig Arctic Ser 26:109-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marfatia L, Rapp R (1993) Ethnocultural diversity and genetic counseling training: The challenge for a twenty-first century. J Genet Couns 2:155-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nsiah-Jefferson L (1993) Access to reproductive genetic services for low-income women and women of color. Fetal Diagn Ther 8(S1):107-127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuñez-Fernández L, Shrader-Cox E, Benson J (1994) Encuesta de opinión sobre el aborto en la ciudad de Mexico. Salud Pública Méx 36(1):36-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ota Wang V (1998) Introduction to Special Issue on Multicultural Genetic Counseling. J Genet Couns 7(1):3-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newburg Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauker SP, Pauker SG (1987) The amniocentesis decision: Ten years of decision analytic experience. Birth Defects Orig Arctic Ser 23(2):151-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preloran HM, Browner CH (1997) Rol de la tradición en la prácticas del embarazo: Efectos de la información genética entre mexicanas residetes en Estados Unidos. Revista de Investigaciones Folklóricas 12:67-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press N, Browner CH (1997) Why women say yes to prenatal testing. Soc Sci Med 45(7):979-989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press N, Browner CH (1998) Characteristics of women who refuse an offer of prenatal diagnosis: Data from the California Maternal Serum Alpha Fetoprotein Blood Test experience. Am J Med Genet 78(5):433-445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press NA, Browner CH (1994) “Collective silences, collective fictions”: How prenatal diagnostic testing became part of routine prenatal care. In: Rothenberg KH, Thomson EJ (eds) Women and Prenatal Testing: Facing the Challenges of Genetic Technology. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp. 201-218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp R (1987) Moral pioneers: Women, men and fetuses on a frontier of reproductive technology. Women Health 13(1-2):101-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp R (1991) Constructing amniocentesis: Maternal and medical discourses. In: Ginsburg F, Tsing AL (eds) Uncertain Terms: Negotiating Gender in America. Boston: Beacon, pp. 28-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp R (1993a) Amniocentesis in sociocultural perspective. J Genet Couns 2:183-196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp R (1993b) Sociocultural differences in the impact of amniocentesis: An anthropological research report. Fetal Diagn Ther 8(S1):90-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roghmann KJ, Doherty RA (1983) Reassurance through prenatal diagnosis and willingness to bear children after age 35. Am J Public Health 73(7):760-762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg KH, Thomson EJ (eds) (1994) Women and Prenatal Testing: Facing the Challenges of Genetic Technology. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman BK (1986) The Tentative Pregnancy: Prenatal Diagnosis and the Future of Motherhood. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski M (1993) With Child in Mind: Studies of the Personal Encounter with Infertility. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz C, Endres M, Zach K, Murken J (1989) Psychosoziale Aspekte der Entscheidung zur Inanspruchnahme pranataler Diagnostik-Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung. Off Gesundh-Wes 51(6):278-284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schover LR, Thomas AJ, Falcone T, Attaran M, Goldberg J (1998) Attitudes about genetic risk of couples undergoing in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 13(4):862-866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson JR, Wertz DC (1986) Couple agreement before and after genetic counseling. Am J Med Genet 25(3):549-555.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) (1998) SPSS for Windows 8.0. SPSS. Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stierman L (1995) Birth Defects in California, 1983-1990. California Department of Health Services, California Birth Defect Monitoring Program.

  • Tatsugawa Z (1995) Genetic Counselor, Fetal Assessment Department, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, CA. Persnal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SJ, Bodgan R (1984) Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: The Search for Meanings (2nd ed.) New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker GM (1986) Barriers to modern contraceptive use in rural Peru. Stud Fam Plan 17 (6 Pt 1):308-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventura SJ, Martin, JA, Mathews TJ, Clarke SC (1996) Advance Report of Final Natality Statistics, 1994. Mon Vital Stat Rep 45(11 suppl).

  • Wilson MG, Chan LS, Herbert WS (1992) Birth prevalence of Down syndrome in a predominantly Latino population: A 15-year study. Teratology 45(3):285-292.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

    Carole H. Browner & H. Mabel Preloran

Authors
  1. Carole H. Browner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Mabel Preloran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Browner, C.H., Preloran, H.M. Male Partners' Role in Latinas' Amniocentesis Decisions. Journal of Genetic Counseling 8, 85–108 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022890714866

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022890714866

Search

Navigation