Skip to main content
Log in

Beyond Parallel Process: Relational Perspectives on Field Instruction

  • Published:
Clinical Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article explores the implications of contemporary relational perspectives for transforming our understanding and use of the concept of parallel process in supervisory relationships in social work field instruction. We review the history of the concept of parallel process, summarize current relational views in psychodynamic supervision, and critique the social work literature in light of the paradigmatic shift to a relational, constructivist viewpoint. We present two vignettes illustrating how relational sensibilities enrich our understanding and increase the effectiveness of the field instruction relationship. We relocate parallel process, which up to now has been a primary, organizing framework in psychodynamic supervision, in a larger relational matrix, where it is one element in a complex, interactive process and serves as a marker for further exploration in reflective social work practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Allphin, C. (1987). Perplexing or distressing episodes in supervision: How they can help in the teaching and learning of psychotherapy. Clinical Social Work Journal, 15, 236-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, E. (1998). Psychoanalytic supervision as the crossroads of a relational matrix. In M. H. Rock (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and the supervisee, pp. 161-186. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casement, P. (1993). Towards autonomy: Some thoughts on psychoanalytic supervision. Journal of Clinical Psychoanalysis, 2, 389-403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, P. (1995). Constructing the self, constructing America: A cultural history of psychotherapy. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekstein, R., & Wallerstein, R. (1958). The teaching and learning of psychotherapy. New York: International University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiscalini, J. (1997). On supervisory parataxis and dialogue. In M. H. Rock (Ed.), Psychodynamic Supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and the supervisee, pp. 29-51. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fosshage, J. L. (1997). Toward a model of psychoanalytic supervision from a self-psychological/intersubjective perspective. In M. H. Rock (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and the supervisee, pp. 189-210. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbard, G. O. (1995). Countertransference: The emerging common ground, International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 76, 475-485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, I. Z. (1992). Some practical implications of a social constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 2, 287-304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, I. Z. (1983). The patient as interpreter of the analyst's experience. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 19, 389-422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, E. (1979). The parallel process in social work treatment and supervision. Social Casework: The Journal of Contemporary Social Work, 60, 520-528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Large, D. (1963). Four processes of field instruction in casework: The field instructor's contribution to instructor-student interaction in second-year field work. Social Service Review, 37, 263-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. A. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis: An integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein, E., & Ganzer, C. (1997). Mitchell's relational conflict model: An analysis of its usefulness in clinical social work. Clinical Social Work Journal, 25, 391-405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, M. H. (1997). Effective supervision. In M. H. Rock (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and the supervisee, pp. 107-132. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosbrow, T. (1997). From parallel process to developmental process: A developmental/plan formulation approach to supervision. In M. H. Rock (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and the supervisee, pp. 213-236. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searles, H. F. (1955). The informational value of the supervisor's emotional experience. Psychiatry, 15, 135-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searles, H. F. (1962). Problems of psychoanalytic supervision. In Collected papers on schizophrenia and related subjects. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. B. (1997). On parallel process in social work supervision. Clinical Social Work Journal, 25, 425-435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, M. E., & Hollis, F. (1990). Casework: A psychosocial therapy. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ganzer, C., Ornstein, E.D. Beyond Parallel Process: Relational Perspectives on Field Instruction. Clinical Social Work Journal 27, 231–246 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022886118408

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022886118408

Navigation