Skip to main content
Log in

Science Park Location and New Technology-Based Firms in Sweden – Implications for Strategy and Performance

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One logical way to assess the performance of Science Parks is to compare the performance of their firms to similar firms not located there. A total of 273 new technology-based firms (NTBFs) were surveyed, of which 134 were on a Science Park and 139 were not on a park. There were significant differences in the means of strategy dimensions between the on-Park and off-Park firms. It can be seen that the NTBFs who located in Science Parks showed significantly greater emphasis on firm characteristics as innovation ability, competitor- and market-orientation, sales and employment growth, high profits etc. The differences indicates a slight advantage for the Science Park firms. The off-Park sample reported proximity to other firms to be of higher importance than the on-Park sample in their choice of location. However, these differences do not show any clear pattern, making it difficult to understand if NTBFs who locate on Science Parks are systematically looking for something different in their location.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Z. J. and D. B. Audretsch, 1988, 'Entrepreneurial Strategy and the Presence of Small Firms', Small Business Economics 1(3), 193-274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D. and E. Bazan, 1990, Value-added Contribution of Pennsylvania's Business Incubators to Tenant Firms and Local Economies. Report prepared for Pennsylvania Department of Commerce (Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, N. R., 1974, 'R&D Project Selection Models: An Assessment', IEE Transactions on Engineering Management E-M-21(4), 165-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollinger, L., K. Hope and J. Utterback, 1983, 'A Review of Literature and Hypotheses on New Technology-based Firms', Research Policy 12, 1-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois, L. J. I., 1980, 'Strategy and Environment: A Conceptual Integration', Academy of Management Review 5(1), 25-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danila, N., 1989, 'Strategic Evaluation and Selection of R&D Projects', R&D Management 19(1), 47-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. L., 1988, 'Technology Partnerships between Larger and Smaller Firms: Some Critical Issues', in F. J. Contractor and P. Lorange (eds.), Cooperative Strategies in International Business: Joint Ventures and Technology Partnerships between Firms. Boston: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. P., 1994, The Geography of Innovation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, D., 1994, 'University-related Science Parks-“Seedbeds” or “Enclaves” of Innovation?', Technovation 14(2), 93-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, F. F., 1971, 'Formulating Strategy in Smaller Companies', Harvard Business Review 49(3), 71-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasmeier, A., 1988, 'Factors Governing the Development of High Tech Industry Agglomerations: A Tale of Three Cities', Regional Studies 22(4), 287-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goss, E. and G. S. Vozikis, 1994, 'High Tech Manufacturing: Firm Size, Industry and Population Density', Small Business Economics 6, 291-297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J. and J. Schakenraad, 1990, 'Inter-firm Partnerships and Co-operative Strategies in Core Technologies', in C. Freeman and L. Soete (eds.), New Explorations in the Economics of Technical Change. London: Frances Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagey, M. J. and E. J. Malecki, 1986, 'Linkages in High Technology Industries: A Florida Case Study', Environment and Planning A 18, 1477-1498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., mR. E. Hoskisson and R. D. Ireland, 1990, 'Mergers and Acquisitions and Managerial Commitment to Innovation in M-form Firms', Strategic Management Journal 11 (special issue), 29-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khandwalla, P. N., 1977, The Design of Organizations. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, A. and T. P. Poot, 1992, 'Do Regions Matter for R&D?', Regional Studies 26, 221-232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. D., 1979, New Technology-based Firms in the U.K. and Federal Republic of Germany. London: Wilton House Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfsten, H. and P. Lindelöf, 2001, 'Science Parks in Sweden-Industrial Renewal and Development?', R&D Management 31(3), 309-322.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, S., 1987, 'British Science Parks: Reflections on the Politics of High Technology', R&D Management 17(1), 25-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malecki, E. J., 1991, Technology and Economic Development: the Dynamics of Local, Regional and National Change. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D., P. Quintas and Wield, 1992, High Tech Fantasies: Science Parks in Society, Science and Space. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mian, S., 1991, An Assessment of University-sponsored Business Incubators in Supporting the Development of New Technology-based Firms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. George Washington University, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mian, S. A., 1994, 'U.S. University-sponsored Technology Incubators: An Overview of Management, Policies and Performance', Technovation 14(9), 515-528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mian, S., 1996, 'Assessing Value-added Contributions of University Technology Business Incubators to Tenant Firms', Research Policy 25, 325-335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mian, S. S., 1997, 'Assessing and Managing the University Technology Business Incubator: An Integrative Framework', Journal of Business Venturing 12, 251-285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., 1987, 'Strategy Making and Structure: Analysis and Implications for Performance', Academy of Management Journal 30(1), 7-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monck, C. S. P., R. B. Porter, P. Quintas, D. J. Storey and P. Wynarczyk, 1988, Science Parks and the Growth of High Technology Firms. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakey, R., R. Rothwell and S. Cooper, 1988, The Management of Innovation in High Technology Small Firms. London: Frances Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, 1981, The Future of University Research. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Paris.

  • OECD, 1993, Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: Technology and Competitiveness. Economic Co-Operation and Development, Paris.

  • O'Farrell, P. N. and D. M. W. N. Hitchens, 1988, 'The Relative Competitiveness and Performance of Small Manufacturing Firms in Scotland and the Mid-west of Ireland: An Analysis of Matched Pairs', Regional Studies 22, 339-415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickles, A. R. and P. N. O'Farrell, 1987, 'An Analysis of Entrepreneurial Behaviour from Male Work Histories', Regional Studies 21(5), 425-444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfirrmann, O., 1994, 'The Geography of Innovation in Small and Medium-sized Firms in West Germany', Small Business Economics 6, 41-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickne, A. and Jacobsson, S., 1999, 'New Technology-based Firms in Sweden-A Study of Their Direct Impact on industrial Renewal', Economics of Innovation and New Technology 8, 197-223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R., 1983, 'Innovation and Firm Size: A Case For Dynamic Complementarity: Or, is Small Really so Beutiful?', Journal of General Management 8(3), 5-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R., 1984, 'The Role of Small Firms in the Emergence of New Technologies', OMEGA-The International Journal of Management Science 12(1), 19-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roure, J. B. and R. H. Keely, 1989, 'Comparison of Predicting Factors of Successful High Growth Technological Ventures in Europe and U.S.A.', in S. Birley (ed.), European Entrepreneurship: Emerging Growth Companies. Cranfield: European Foundation for Entrepreneurship Research.

  • Segers, J. P., 1993, 'Strategic Partnering between Newtechnology Based Firms and Large Established Firms in the Biotechnology and Micro-electronics Industries in Belgium', Small Business Economics 5, 271-281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souder, W. E. and T. Mandakovic, 1986, 'R&D Project Selection Models-The Dawn of a New Era', Research Management 29(4), 36-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souder, W. E., P. M. Maher, C. R. Shumway, N. R. Baker and A. H. Rubenstein, 1974, 'Methodology for Increasing the Adoption of R&D Project Selection Models', R&D Management 4(2), 75-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. and A. Silberston, 1973, The Economic Impact of the Patent System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Auwera, F. and D. Eysenbrandts, 1989, High Tech Firms in Flanders. Brussels: BBM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. H., 1972, Evaluation Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westhead, P., 1997, 'R&D “Inputs” and “Outputs” of Technology-based Firms Located on and Off Science Parks', R&D Management 27(1), 45-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westhead, P. and D. J. Storey, 1994, An Assessment of Firms Located On and Off Science Parks in the United Kingdom. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westhead, P. and D. J. Storey, 1995, 'Links Between Higher Education Institutions and High Technology Firms', OMEGA-International Journal of Management Science 23(4), 345-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yap, C. M. and W. E. Souder, 1993, 'A Filter System for Technology Evaluation and Selection', Technovation 13(7), 449-469.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindelöf, P., Löfsten, H. Science Park Location and New Technology-Based Firms in Sweden – Implications for Strategy and Performance. Small Business Economics 20, 245–258 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022861823493

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022861823493

Keywords

Navigation