Skip to main content
Log in

The Application of Object Relations Theory to Domestic Violence

  • Published:
Clinical Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article suggests that the addition of object relations theory to the two dominant theories of feminist theory and family systems theory can contribute to the understanding of domestic violence. Feminist theory largely contributes to the understanding of the macro issues while family systems theory is descriptive at the mezzo level of interpersonal processes and dynamics. Object relations theory can make a unique contribution at the micro level with an understanding of intrapsychic processes which influence adult interpersonal behavior. This article examines some of the main concepts of object relations theory as applied to the issue of domestic violence. A case discussion is offered to illuminate the application of object relations theory to domestic violence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Claes, J.A. and Rosenthal, D.M. (1990). Men Who Batter Women: A Study in Power. Journal of Family Violence, 5,3, 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, K.H. (1980). Conjugal Violence: What 33 men Report. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 6, 207–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D.R. and Frantz-Cook, A. (1984). A Systemic Treatment Approach to Wife Battering. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 10,1, 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L.V., Hagen, J.L., and Early, T.J. (1994). Social Services for Battered Women: Are They Adequate, Accessible, and Appropriate. Social Work, 39,6, 695–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D.G. (1995). A Scale for Measuring Propensity of Abusiveness. Journal of Family Violence, 10,2, 203–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D.G., Saudners, K., Starzomski, A., and Bartholomew, K. (1994). Intimacy-Anger and Attachments as Precursors of Abuse in Intimate Relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24,15, 1367–1386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D.G. and Starzomski, A. (1993). Borderline Personality in Perpetrators of Psychological and Physical Abuse. Violence and Victims, 8,4, 327–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D.G., Starzomski, A., and Ryan, L. (1996). Antecedents of Abusive Personality and Abusive Behavior in Wife Assaulters. Journal of Family Violence, 11,2, 113–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, L.B. (1979). Marital Conflict and Marital Intimacy: An Integrative Psychodynamic Behavioral Systemic Model. Family Process, 18, 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbairn, W.R.D. (1949). Steps in the Development of an Object Relations Theory of the Personality. In: Psychoanalytic Studies of the Personality. London: Tavistock, pp. 152–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbairn, W.R.D. (1952). An Object Relations Theory of the Personality. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Framo, J. (1982). Explorations in Marital and Family Therapy: Selected Papers of James Framo. New York: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelles, R. (1979). Family Violence. Beverly Hills, CA.: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, D. and Rosenbaum, A. (1985). An Evaluation of Self Esteem of Maritally Violent Men. Family Relations, 34, 425–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger, L.K. and Hastings, J.E. (1986). Personality Correlates of Men Who Abuse Their Partners: A Cross Validation Study. Journal of Family Violence, 1, 323–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger, L.K., Lohr, J.M., Bonge, D., and Tolin, D.F. (1996). A Large Sample Empirical Typology of Male Spouse Abusers and Its Relationship to Dimensions of Abuse. Violence and Victims, 11,4, 277–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotaling, G.T. and Sugarman, D.B. (1984). An Identification of Risk Factors. In G.L. Bowen, M.A. Straus, A.J. Sedlak, G.T. Hotaling, and D.B. Sugarman. Domestic Violence Surveillance System Feasibility Study: Phase I Report. An Identification of Outcomes and and Risk Factors. Rockville, MD: Westat, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko, S.Y. (1984). The Family System, Temporary or Permanent Auxiliary Ego: The Differential Fate of Self-Objects. Clinical Social Work Journal, 12, 303–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. (1975). Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism. New York: Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesner, J.E., Julian, T., and McKenry, P.C. (1997). Application of Attachment Theory to Male Violence Toward Female Intimates. Journal of Family Violence, 12,2, 211–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1932). The Psychoanalysis of Children. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1946). Notes on Some Schizoid Mechanisms. In Envy and Gratitude. New York: Dell

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachkar, J. (1992). The Narcissistic Borderline Couple: A Psychoanalytic Perspective on Marital Treatment. New York: Brunner Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucente, R.L. (1994). The Concept of Developmental Lines in Marital Therapy. Journal of Analytic Social Work, 2, 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miehls, D. (1993). Conjoint Treatment With Narcissistic Couples: Strategies to Increase Empathic Interactions. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 64, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. (1995). Varieties of Narcissistically Vulnerable Couples: Dynamics and Practice Implications. Clinical Social Work Journal, 23, 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okun, L. (1986). Woman Abuse: Facts Replacing Myths. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, J.E. and Arias, I. (1994). The Role of Perceived Control and the Desirability of Control Among Abusive and Non Abusive Husbands. American Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 126–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J.S. (1991). Analysis of Projective Identification: An Object Relations Approach to Marital Treatment. Clinical Social Work Journal, 19, 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J.S. (1992). Repairing Intimacy: An Object Relations Approach to Couples Therapy. Northvale, N. J.: Jason Aronson, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R.H., Peters, T.C., Marsh, S., and Peters, M.J. (1975). An Object Relations Approach to Psychotherapy With Marital Couples, Families, and Children. Family Process, 14, 161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M.A. and Gelles, R.J. (1986). Societal Changes and Changes in Family Violence from 1975 to 1985 as Revealed by Two National Surveys. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 465–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M., Gelles, R., and Steinmentz, S. (1980). Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family. Garden City: Anchor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, F. (1994). Object Relations Theories and Psychopathology. Hillsdale, N.J.: Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L.E. (1979). The Battered Woman. New York: Harper Colophon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L.E. (1984). The Battered Women Syndrome. New York: Springer Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, J. and Dreen, K. (1982). Wife Beating: A View of the Marital Dyad. Social Casework, 63,5, 259–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D.W. (1950). Aggression in Relation to Emotional Development. In Through Paediatrics to Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodarski, J.S. (1987). An Examination of Spouse Abuse: Practice Issues for the Profession. Clinical Social Work Journal, 15, 172–186.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zosky, D.L. The Application of Object Relations Theory to Domestic Violence. Clinical Social Work Journal 27, 55–69 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022861331105

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022861331105

Navigation