Abstract
The paper applies both the standard DEA methodology with contemporaneous frontiers and DEA with sequential frontiers to study changes in productivity and efficiency in manufacturing for a sample of eleven OECD countries over a twenty-year period. It uses a decomposition of the industrial Malmquist productivity indices to locate the sources of productivity growth: 'technical progress' and 'catching up.' The alternative indices are interrelated in a unifying framework that provides an interpretation to their difference. We argue that for manufacturing industries, in which technological regress is unlikely to occur, DEA with sequential frontiers provides a more adequate measure for the contribution of technical changes than standard DEA.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramovitz, M. (1986). "Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind." Journal of Economic History 46(2), 385-406.
Barro, R. J. and X. Sala-i-Martin. (1991). "Convergence Across States and Regions." Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1, 107-158.
De Borger, B. and K. Kerstens. (2000). "The Malmquist Productivity Index and Plant Capacity Utilization." Scandinavian Journal of Economics 102(2), 303-310.
Caves, D. W., L. R. Christensen and W. Erwin Diewert. (1982). "The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output and Productivity." Econometrica 50(6), 1393-1414.
Charnes, A., C. T. Clark, W. W. Cooper and B. Golany. (1985). "A Development Study of Data Envelopment Analysis in Measuring the Efficiency of Maintenance Units in the US Air Forces." Annals of Operations Research 2, 95-112.
Färe, R., R. Grabowski and S. Grosskopf. (1985). "Technical Efficiency of Philippine Agriculture." Journal of Productivity Analysis 17, 205-214.
Färe, R. and S. Grosskopf. (1996). Intertemporal Production Frontiers: With Dynamic DEA. Kluwer Academic, Boston.
Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, B. Lindgren and P. Roos. (1989). "Productivity Development in Swedish Hospitals: A Malmquist Output Index Approach." Discussion Paper No 89-3. Southern Illinois University.
Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, M. Norris and Z. Zhang. (1994). "Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries." American Economic Review 84(1), 66-83.
Farrell, M. J. (1957). "The Measurement of Productive Efficiency." Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A-General 120(3), 253-290.
Gouette, C. and S. Perelman. (1997). "Productivity Convergence in OECD Service Industries." Structural Changes and Economic Dynamics 8, 279-295.
OECD. (1996). "International Sectoral Data Base." ISDB.
Perelman, S. (1995). "R&D, Technological Progress and Efficiency Change in Industrial Activities." Review of Income and Wealth 41(3), 349-366.
Solow, R. M. (1957). "Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function." The Review of Economics and Statistics 39(3), 312-320.
Taskin, F. and O. Zaim. (1997). "Catching Up and Innovations in High-and Low-Income Countries." Economic Letters 54, 93-100.
Tulkens, H. and P. V. Eeckaut. (1995). "Non-Parametric Efficiency, Progress and Regress Measure for Panel Data: Methodological Aspects." European Journal of Operational Research 80, 474-499.
Weber, W. L. and B. R. Domazlicky. (1999). "Total Factor Productivity Growth in Manufacturing: A Regional Approach Using Linear Programming." Regional Science and Urban Economics 29, 105-122.
Wolff, E. N. (1993). "Productivity Growth and Capital Intensity on the Sector and Industry Level: Specialization among OECD Countries, 1970-1988." In G. Silverberger and L. Soete (eds.), The Economics of Growth and Technical Change. Edward Elgar, Aldershot, 185-211.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shestalova, V. Sequential Malmquist Indices of Productivity Growth: An Application to OECD Industrial Activities. Journal of Productivity Analysis 19, 211–226 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022857501478
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022857501478