Journal of Financial Services Research

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 89–112 | Cite as

A Test of Cultural Affinity in Home Mortgage Lending

  • Raphael W. Bostic
Article

Abstract

This paper assess cultural affinity as a potential explanation for observed racial disparities in mortgage rejection rates. Two formulations of the theory have evolved in the literature. The taste-based cultural affinity hypothesis asserts that lenders have a blanket preference for members of the same race, while the common bond hypothesis asserts that cultural affinity allows lenders to better assess the credit quality of members of the same race. The analysis involves tests that focus on the experiences of applicants with marginal credit quality, as the two theories offer conflicting predictions regarding their application patterns and treatment by lenders. The results of these tests provide weak support for the existence of taste-based cultural affinity, but contradict the predictions of the common bond form of the theory.

cultural affinity mortgages discrimination. 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avery, Robert B., Raphael W. Bostic, Paul S. Calem, and Glenn B. Canner. “Credit Risk, Credit Scoring, and the Performance of Home Mortgages.” Federal Reserve Bulletin 82 (July 1996), 621–648.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, Gary S. The Economics of Discrimination, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  3. Berkovec, James A., Glenn B. Canner, Stuart A. Gabriel, and Timothy H. Hannan. “Race, Redlining, and Residential Mortgage Loan Performance.” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 9 (November 1994), 263–294.Google Scholar
  4. Black, Harold A., M. Cary Collins, and Ken B. Cyree. “Do Black-Owned Banks Discriminate against Black Borrowers?” Journal of Financial Services Research 11 (February/April 1997), 189–204.Google Scholar
  5. Bostic, Raphael W, and Glenn B. Canner. “Do Minority-Owned Banks Treat Minorities Better? An Empirical Test of the Cultural Affinity Hypothesis.” Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference on Bank Structure and Competition (1998), 113–133.Google Scholar
  6. Calomiris, Charles W., Charles M. Kahn, and Stanley D. Longhofer. “Housing-Finance Intervention and Private Incentives: Helping Minorities and the Poor.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 26 (August 1994), 634–678.Google Scholar
  7. Canner, Glenn B, and Delores S. Smith. “Home Mortgage Disclosure Act: Expanded Data on Residential Lending.” Federal Reserve Bulletin 77 (November 1991), 859–881.Google Scholar
  8. Cornell, Bradford, and Ivo Welch. “Culture, Information, and Screening Discrimination.” Journal of Political Economy 104 (June 1996), 542–571.Google Scholar
  9. Downs, Anthony. “The Challenge of Our Declining Big Cities.” Housing Policy Debate 8,no. 2 (1997), 359–408.Google Scholar
  10. Heckman, James J. “The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models.” Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 5 (Fall 1976), 475–492.Google Scholar
  11. Hunter, William C., and Mary Beth Walker. “The Cultural Affinity Hypothesis and Mortgage Lending Decisions.” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 13 (July 1996), 57–70.Google Scholar
  12. Kim, Sunwoong, and Gregory D. Squires. “Lender Characteristics and Racial Disparities in Mortgage Lending.” Journal of Housing Research 6 (1995), 99–114.Google Scholar
  13. Lang, William C., and Leonard I. Nakamura. “A Model of Redlining.” Journal of Urban Economics 33 (1993), 223–234.Google Scholar
  14. Longhofer, Stanley D. “Cultural Affinity and Mortgage Discrimination.” Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Economic Review 32 (Third Quarter 1996), 12–24.Google Scholar
  15. Munnell, Alicia H., Geoffrey M. Tootell, Lynn E. Browne, and James McEneaney. “Mortgage Lending in Boston: Interpreting HMDA Data.” American Economic Review 86 (March 1996), 25–53.Google Scholar
  16. Peterson, Richard L. “An Investigation of Sex Discrimination in Commercial Banks' Direct Consumer Lending.” The Bell Journal of Economics 12 (Autumn 1981), 547–61.Google Scholar
  17. Schill, Michael H., and Susan M. Wachter. “Housing Market Constraints and Spatial Stratification by Income and Race.” Housing Policy Debate 6,no. 1 (1995), 141–167.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raphael W. Bostic
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Southern California and Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemUSA

Personalised recommendations