Abstract
After describing an innovative technology, the close-coupled gasification and cyclonic combustor, this article explores the policy issues that inhibit a superior sustainable solution fromflourishing. Discussion of technology includes defining biomass,explaining what biomass to energy means, what the advantages of biomass to energy are, and why gasification is a superior biomassto energy technology. Specifically the environmental benefits ofalternatives to landspreading of traditional manure management arediscussed, as well as the advantages of gasification versus traditional combustion techniques for high nitrogen fuels. The policy environment is explored, particularly regarding sustainability, manure management, and renewable energy. Artificial, non-sustainable barriers to renewable energy, and the impact of wide jurisdictional variability are discussed. North Carolina is identified as a unique jurisdiction to monitor because of its high volume of livestock manure, and laggard position in renewable energy advocacy. The authors contend that these two positions are unsustainable, and that pressures can beexpected to force the state to modify its renewable energy policies or risk losing market share in livestock production tomore pro-sustainable policy oriented states.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown, S. P. A. and Wolk, D.: 2000, 'Natural Resource Scarcity and Technological Change', Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Economic and Financial Review, pp. 2-13.
Chapman, D. and Khanna, N.: 2001, 'An economic analysis of aspects of petroleum and military security in the Persian Gulf', Contemp. Econ. Policy 19, 371-381.
Chapman, D.: 2000, Environmental Economics: Theory, Application, and Policy, Addison, Wesley, Longman, Inc.
Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration: 2001, 'U.S. Electric Utility Receipts of and Average Cost for Fossil Fuels, 1990 through May 2001' http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/epmt26p1.html.
Elkington, J.: 1998, Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, New Society Publishers.
Environmental Protection Agency: 2001, Proposed Regulations to Address Water Pollution from Concentrated Animal Facility Operations, EPA 833-F-00-016.
Fuller, R. B.: 1981, Critical Path, St. Martin's Press.
Goodstein, E.: 2002, Economics and the Environment, 3rd ed., Prentice Hall, Inc.
Hall, D. C.: 1992, 'Oil and national security', Energy Policy 20, 1089-1096.
Levesque, C. J.: 1999, ',enewable portfolios: The new PURPA?', Publ. Util. Fortnightly 137, 16-17.
pres/d_reicher.pdf.
Schwarz, P. M. and Buckley, J.: 2002, 'Taxes, Trading, or Tandem: Alternatives for Achieving Efficient Air Quality', in: Critical Issues in International Environmental Taxes, CCH Incorporated.
Stouffer, R.: 2001, 'Utilities Should Prepare for Higher Coal Prices', Energy Insight, 19 October.
Sustainable Enterprise Academy: 2001, Report on Second Business Leader Seminar, King City, Ontario, 14-17 May.
Wagman, D.: 2001, A Vulnerable System Looks for Security, Financial Times Energy, September. Vol. 14, pp. 1-5.
World Commission on Environment and Development: 1987, Our Common Future (The Bruntland Report), Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buckley, J.C., Schwarz, P.M. Renewable Energy from Gasification of Manure: An Innovative Technology in Search of Fertile Policy. Environ Monit Assess 84, 111–127 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022847416139
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022847416139