Skip to main content
Log in

Public Resource Allocation and Electoral Systems in the U.S. and Japan

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper introduces alternative measures of net budgetallocation and legislative representation. They are neutral tothe size of total expenditure and tax collection as well as tochanges in the population and the size of the legislature,which makes them suitable for panel data exercises andinternational comparative studies. Regression analyses of 50U.S. states and 47 Japanese prefectures using these indiceshighlight similarities and differences in public resourceallocation between respective democracies that reflect theirpolitical and electoral systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atlas, C.M, Hendershott, R.J. and Zupan, M.A. (1997). Optimal effort allocation by U.S. Senators: The role of constituency size. Public Choice 92: 221-229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atlas, C.M, Gilligan, T.W., Hendershott, R.J. and Zupan, M. A. (1995). Slicing the federal government net spending pie:Who wins, who loses, and why.American Economic Review 85: 624-629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. and Mayberry, E.R. (1979). Federal tax burdens and grant benefits to states: The impact of imperfect representations. Public Choice 34: 255-269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biorn, E. (1992). Panel data with measurement errors. In Matyas, L. and Sevestre, P. (Eds.), The econometrics of panel data, 152-195. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. and Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

  • Fleck, R.K. (2001a). Population, land, economic conditions, and the allocation of New Deal spending. Explorations in Economic History 38: 296-304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, R.K. (2001b). Inter-party competition, intra-party competition, and distributive policy: A model and test using New Deal data. Public Choice 108: 77-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grier, K.B, McDonald, M. and Tollison, R.D. (1995).Electoral politics and the executive veto: A predictive theory. Economic Inquiry 33: 427-440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer. S.A. and Naka, S. (1999). The determinants of Japanese local-benefit seeking.Contemporary Economic Policy 17:87-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, S.A. and Naka, S. (1998). Legislative influences in Japanese budgetary politics. Public Choice 94: 267-288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naka, S., Brough, W.T. and Tanaka, K. (1994). The political economy of post-World War II Japanese development: A rent-seeking perspective. In Boettke, P. (Ed.), The collapse of development planning, 256-285. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, J.J. (2001). The political economy of New Deal spending, yet again: A reply to Fleck. Explorations in Economic History 38: 305-314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, J.J. (1998). The political economy of New Deal spending revisited, again: With and without Nevada. Explorations in Economic History 35: 140-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, J.J. (1987). Employment, politics, and economic recovery during the Great Depression. Review of Economics and Statistics 69: 516-520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G. (1974). The political economy of New Deal spending: An econometric analysis Review of Economics and Statistics 56: 30-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonehara, J. (1993). Financial relations between the national and local governments. In Shibata, T. (Ed.), Japan's public sector, 167-178. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zupan, M.A. (1991). Local benefit-seeking and national policymaking: Democrats vs. Republicans in the legislature. Public Choice 68: 245-258.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kawaura, A. Public Resource Allocation and Electoral Systems in the U.S. and Japan. Public Choice 115, 63–81 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022841703429

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022841703429

Keywords

Navigation