Skip to main content
Log in

Genetics of spike length in durum wheat

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gene effects were analyzed using mean spike length of 12 populations, viz., both parents, F1, F2, first back cross generation, BC1 and BC2, second backcross generations, BC11,BC12, BC21 and BC22 along with BC1 self and BC2 self derived by selfing BC1 and BC2populations of three crosses involving six diverse cultivars of Triticum durumto determine the nature of gene actions governing spike length through generation mean analysis under normal and late sown environments. The six-parameter model was adequate in most of the cases to explain genetic variation among the generation means under both the sowing environments. Additive (d) gene effect was significant in all the cases, whereas dominance (h) gene effect was not so frequently observed significant. Epistatic effects, particularly digenic types were predominant over additive and dominance effects in most of the cases under both normal and late sown environments except in the cross Cocorit 71 × A-9-30-1 (normal sown).Additive × dominance × dominance (y), trigenic interaction played significant role in controlling the inheritance of this trait in the cross HI 8062 × JNK-4W-128under late sown condition. Duplicate epistasis was observed in the cross HI 8062× JNK-4W-128 (normal sown). Non-fixable gene effects were of higher magnitude than fixable gene effects in almost all cases, confirmed the major role of non-additive gene effects to control the inheritance of spike length in durum wheat. Significant heterosis over better parent was not observed. Similarly, inbreeding depression was not commonly observed. Favourable and suitable environment must be considered before finalizing breeding programme for its simple inheritance to get desirable improvement for high grain yield. Hybridization systems, such as biparental mating and / or diallel selective mating, which exploit both additive and non-additive gene effects, simultaneously, could be useful in the improvement of spike length in durum wheat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brim, A.C. & C.C. Co-Ckerham, 1961. Inheritance of quantitative characters in Soyabean. Crop Sci 1: 187-190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli, L.L., 1952. An analysis of linkage in quantitative inheritance. In: E.C. Reeve & C.H. Waddington (Eds.), Quantitative Inheritance, pp. 135-144. H.M.S.O., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, T. & A.B. Mondal, 1988. Diallel analysis in wheat. Indian J Genet 48(2): 167-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhindsa, G.S. & K.S. Bains, 1987. Genetics of harvest index in wheat. Indian J Agric Sci 58: 529-534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edward, C.H., H. Ketala & E.L. Smith, 1976. Gene action of heading date, plant height and other characters in two winter wheat crosses. Crop Sci 16: 275-277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, E.E., 1962. Gene effects in corn (Zea mays L.) I. Separation and relative importance of gene effects for yield. Can J Pl Sci 42: 339-348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, K.S., G.S. Nanda & Gurdev Sinsh, 1977. Inheritance of plant height, tiller number, ear length and number of spikelets in two spring winter crosses in wheat. Genet Agr 31: 227-237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J., 1966. Recurrent backcrossing in the study of quantitative inheritance. Heredity 21: 85-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayman, B.I., 1958. The separation of epistatic from additive and dominance variation in generation means. Heredity 12: 371-390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinks, J.L., 1955. A survey of the genetical basis of heterosis in a variety of diallel, crosses. Heredity 9: 223-238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinks, J.L. & R.M. Jones, 1958. Estimation of components of heterosis. Genetics 43: 223-234.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katiyar, P.K. & Z. Ahmed, 1996. Detection of epistasis components of variation for yield contributing traits over two environments in bread wheat. Indian J Genet 56(3): 285-291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M.S. & S.N. Sharma, 1995. Combining ability in the F1 and F2 generations for diallel cross inmacaroni wheat. Indian J Genet 55(2): 160-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matinzinger, D.F., 1968. Genetic variability in the cured varieties, of Nicotiana tabacum L. III Sc. 58 × Dixie Bright, 244. Crop Sci 14: 287-290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, U. & S.N. Sharma, 1997. Genetics of yield determining factors in spring wheat over environment. Indian J Genet 57(3): 301-306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagarajan, S., 2001. Annual Report 2000-2001, Directorate of Wheat Research, Karnal, Haryana, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanda, G.S. G.N. Hazarika & K.S Gill, 1981. Inheritance of heading date, plant height, ear length and spikelets per spike in an intervarietal cross of wheat. Theor Appl Genet 60: 167-171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patil, V.R., S.C. Desale & S.S. Mehetre, 1997. Combining ability analysis for grain yield and its components in bread wheat. Crop Res 14(3): 471-476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prabhu, K.V. & G.S. Sharma, 1984. Combining ability for physiological traits in spring wheat. Indian J Genet 44(1): 34-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghuvansi, K.M.S., S.P. Singh, S.K. Rao & C.B. Singh, 1988. Diallel analysis for yield and its components in bread wheat (T. aestivum L.). Indian J Agric Sci 8: 189-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S.K., I. Singh & K.P. Singh, 1986. Heterosis and combining ability in wheat (T. aestivum L.). Crop Sci 13: 101-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S.K. & R.K. Singh, 1983. Combining ability for harvest index and its components in wheat. Indian J Genet 43(2): 229-231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S.N. & S.R. Maloo, 1987. Combining ability studies in durum wheat. Madras Agric J 73(7): 370-374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheikh, S., I. Singh & J. Singh, 2000. Inheritance of some quantitative traits in bread wheat (T. aestivum L. em. Thell.). Ann Agric Res 21(1): 51-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, G. & G.S. Nanda, 1989. Estimation of gene action through triple test cross in bread wheat (T. aestivum L.). Indian J Genet 59(11): 700-702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, I. & R.S. Paroda, 1987. Partial diallel analysis for combining ability in wheat. Indian J Genet 47 (1): 1-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. & R.B. Singh, 1976. Triple test cross analysis in two wheat crosses. Heredity 37: 173-177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G.W. & W.G. Cochran, 1968. Statistical Methods, The Iowa State Univ. Press, Amer. U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuber, C.W. & R.H. Moll, 1974. Epistasis in maize (Zea mays L.) IV. Crosses among lines selected for superior inter-variety single cross performance. Crop Sci 14: 314-317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, G.N., 1965. Photosynthesis of ears and flag leaves of barley and wheat. Ann Bot 115: 2317-329

    Google Scholar 

  • Virk, D.S., S.P. Virk & H.S. Aulakh, 1989. Detection of additive, dominance and epistatic variation using single tester analysis in bread wheat. Indian J Genet 9: 213-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walia, D.P., T. Dawa, P. Phaha & H.K. Choudhary, 1995. Gene effects controlling grain yield and its components in bread wheat (T. aestivum L.). Agric Sci Digest 15(3): 129-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, R.K. & V.G. Narsinghani, 2000. Heterosis and inbreeding depression in wheat. Indian J Genet 60(3): 381-382.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, S., Sain, R. & Sharma, R. Genetics of spike length in durum wheat. Euphytica 130, 155–161 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022814301871

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022814301871

Navigation