Skip to main content
Log in

Family of Projected Descent Methods for Optimization Problems with Simple Bounds

  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a family of projected descent direction algorithms with inexact line search for solving large-scale minimization problems subject to simple bounds on the decision variables. The global convergence of algorithms in this family is ensured by conditions on the descent directions and line search. Whenever a sequence constructed by an algorithm in this family enters a sufficiently small neighborhood of a local minimizer ○ satisfying standard second-order sufficiency conditions, it gets trapped and converges to this local minimizer. Furthermore, in this case, the active constraint set at ○ is identified in a finite number of iterations. This fact is used to ensure that the rate of convergence to a local minimizer, satisfying standard second-order sufficiency conditions, depends only on the behavior of the algorithm in the unconstrained subspace. As a particular example, we present projected versions of the modified Polak–Ribière conjugate gradient method and the limited-memory BFGS quasi-Newton method that retain the convergence properties associated with those algorithms applied to unconstrained problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goldstein, A. A., Convex Programming in Hilbert Space, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, Vol. 70, pp. 709–710, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Levitin, E. S., and Polyak, B. T., Constrained Minimization Problems, USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, Vol. 6, pp. 1–50, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bertsekas, D. P., On the Goldstein-Levitin-Poljak Gradient Projection Method, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 21, pp. 174–184, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bertsekas, D. P., Projected Newton Methods for Optimization Problems with Simple Constraints, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, Vol. 20, pp. 221–246, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dunn, J. C., A Projected Newton Method for Minimization Problems with Nonlinear Inequality Constraints, Numerische Mathematik, Vol. 53, pp. 377–409, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Quintana, V. H., and Davison, E. J., Clipping-off Gradient Algorithms to Compute Optimal Controls with Constrained Magnitude, International Journal of Control, Vol. 20, pp. 243–255, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Conn, A. R., Gould, N., and Toint, P. L., Global Convergence of a Class of Trust Region Algorithms for Optimization with Simple Bounds, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, Vol. 25, pp. 433–460, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Conn, A. R., Gould, N., and Toint, P. L., A Globally Convergent Augmented Lagrangian Algorithm for Optimization with General Constraints and Simple Bounds, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, Vol. 28, pp. 545–572, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Byrd, R. H., Lu, P., Nocedal, J., and Zhu, C., A Limited Memory Algorithm for Bound Constrained Optimization, Report NAM-08, Electrical Engineering Department, Northwestern University, 1994.

  10. More, J. J., and Toraldo, G., Algorithms for Bound Constrained Quadratic Programming Problems, Numerische Mathematik, Vol. 55, pp. 377–400, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Calamai, P. H., and More, J. J., Projected Gradient Methods for Linearly Constrained Problems, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 39, pp. 93–116, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kelley, C. T., and Sachs, E. W., Solution of Optimal Control Problems by a Pointwise Projected Newton Method, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, Vol. 33, pp. 1731–1757, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Polak, E., Sargent, R. W. H., and Sebastian, D. J., On the Convergence of Sequential Minimization Algorithms, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 14, pp. 439–442, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nocedal, J., Updating Quasi-Newton Matrices with Limited Storage, Mathematics of Computation, Vol. 35, pp. 773–782, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Powell, M. J. D., Restart Procedures for the Conjugate Gradient Method, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 12, pp. 241–254, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Luenberger, D. G., Linear and Nonlinear Programming, 2nd Edition, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bertsekas, D. P., Constrained Optimization and Lagrange Multiplier Methods, Academic Press, New York, New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Golub, G. H., and Loan, C. F., Matrix Computations, 2nd Edition, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Luenberger, D. G., Convergence Rate of a Penalty-Function Scheme, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 7, pp. 39–51, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Polak, E., Computational Methods in Optimization, Academic Press, New York, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gilbert, J. C., and Nocedal, J., Global Convergence Properties of Conjugate Gradient Methods for Optimization, SIAM Journal on Optimization, Vol. 2, pp. 21–42, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schwartz, A., and Polak, E., Consistent Approximations for Optimal Control Problems Based on Runge-Kutta Integration, SIAM Journal on Optimization and Control, Vol. 34, pp. 1235–1269, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bertsekas, D. P., Partial Conjugate Gradient Methods for a Class of Optimal Control Problems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 19, pp. 209–217, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dunn, J. C., and Bertsekas, D. P., Efficient Dynamic Programming Implementations of Newton's Method for Unconstrained Optimal Control Problems, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 63, pp. 23–38, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Liu, D. C., and Nocedal, J., On the Limited Memory BFGS Method for Large-Scale Optimization, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 45, pp. 503–528, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shanno, D. F., and Phua, K. H., Matrix Conditioning and Nonlinear Optimization, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 14, pp. 149–160, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zou, X., Navon, I. M., Berger, M., Phua, K. H., Schlick, T., and Dimet, F. X., Numerical Experience with Limited-Memory Quasi-Newton and Truncated Newton Methods, SIAM Journal on Optimization, Vol. 3, pp. 582–608, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwartz, A., Polak, E. Family of Projected Descent Methods for Optimization Problems with Simple Bounds. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 92, 1–31 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022690711754

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022690711754

Navigation