Skip to main content
Log in

Topological Fixed Point Theorems Do Not Hold for Random Dynamical Systems

  • Published:
Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that topological fixed point theorems have no canonical generalization to the case of random dynamical systems. This is done by using tools from algebraic ergodic theory. We give a criterion for the existence of invariant probability measures for group valued cocycles. With that, examples of continuous random dynamical systems on a compact interval without random invariant points, which are an appropriate generalization of fixed points, are constructed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Arnold, L. (1998). Random Dynamical Systems, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arnold, L. (1995). Random dynamical systems. In Johnson, R. (ed.), Dynamical Systems. Lecture Notes Math. 1609, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, pp. 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold, L., and Boxler, P. (1991). Additive noise turns a hyperbolic fixed point into a stationary solution. In Arnold, L., Crauel, H., and Eckmann, J.-P. (eds.), Lyapunov Exponents, Oberwolfach 1990. Lecture Notes Math. 1486, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, pp. 159–164.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crauel, H. (1995). Random Probability Measures on Polish Spaces, Habilitationsschrift, Bremen.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Keynes, H. B., and Newton, D. (1974). The structure of ergodic measures for compact group extensions. Israel J. Math. 18, 363–389.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Knill, O. (1991). The upper Lyapunov exponents of SL(2, ℝ) cocycles: Discontinuity and the problem of positivity. In Arnold, L., Crauel, H., and Eckmann, J.-P. (eds.), Lyapunov Exponents, Oberwolfach 1990. Lecture Notes Math. 1486, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, pp. 86–97.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, P.-D. (1988). Random perturbations of Axiom A basic sets. J. Stat. Phys. 90, 467–490.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ochs, G. (1998). Examples of random dynamical systems without random fixed points. Universitatis Iagellonicae Acta Mathematica, Fasc. XXXVI, Krakow, pp. 133–141.

  9. Parthasarathy, K. R. (1967). Probability Measures on Metric Spaces, Academic Press, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schmalfuß, B. (1996). A random fixed point theorem based on Lyapunov exponents. Rand. Comp. Dyn. 4, 267–268.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schmalfuß, B. (1997). A random fixed point theorem and the random graph transformation. Report No. 402, Institut für Dynamische Systeme, Bremen.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schmidt, K. (1981). Amenability, Kazdan's property T, strong ergodicity and invariant means for ergodic group actions. Ergod. Theory Dynam. Syst. 1, 223–236.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zimmer, R. (1977). Random walks on compact groups and the existence of cocycles. Israel J. Math. 26, 84–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ochs, G., Oseledets, V.I. Topological Fixed Point Theorems Do Not Hold for Random Dynamical Systems. Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations 11, 583–593 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022670227876

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022670227876

Navigation