Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal Ascent Trajectories and Feasibility of Next-Generation Orbital Spacecraft

  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with the optimization of the ascent trajectories for single-stage-to-orbit (SSTO) and two-stage-to-orbit (TSTO) rocket-powered spacecraft. The maximum payload weight problem is studied for various combinations of initial thrust-to-weight ratio, engine specific impulse, and spacecraft structural factor. For TSTO rocket-powered spacecraft, two cases are studied: uniform structural factor and nonuniform structural factor between stages.

The main conclusions are that: the design of SSTO configurations might be comfortably feasible, marginally feasible, or unfeasible, depending on the parameter values assumed; the design of TSTO configurations is not only feasible, but the payload appears to be considerably larger than that of SSTO configurations; for the case of a nonuniform structural factor, the most attactive TSTO design appears to be a first-stage structure made of only tanks and a second-stage structure made of engines, tanks, electronics, and so on.

Improvements in engine specific impulse and spacecraft structural factor are desirable and crucial for SSTO feasibility; indeed, aerodynamic improvements do not yield significant improvements in payload weight.

For SSTO configurations, the maximum payload weight behaves almost linearly with respect to the engine specific impulse and the spacecraft structural factor. The same property holds for TSTO configurations as long as the ratio of the structural factors of Stage 2 and Stage 1 is held constant. With reference to the specific impulse/structural factor domain, this property leads to the construction of a zero-payload line separating the feasibility region (positive payload) from the unfeasibility region (negative payload).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miele, A., and Mancuso, S., Optimal Ascent Trajectories for SSTO and TSTO Spacecraft, Aero-Astronautics Report 276, Rice University, 1997.

  2. Miele, A., and Mancuso, S., Optimal Ascent Trajectories for TSTO Spacecraft: Extensions, Aero-Astronautics Report 277, Rice University, 1997.

  3. Miele, A., and Mancuso, S., Optimal Ascent Trajectories for SSSO, SSTO, and TSTO Spacecraft: Extensions, Aero-Astronautics Report 278, Rice University, 1997.

  4. Anonymous, N. N., Access to Space Study, Summary Report, Office of Space Systems Development, NASA Headquarters, 1994.

  5. Freeman, D. C., Talay, T. A., Stanley, D. O., Lepsch, R. A., and Wihite, A. W., Design Options for Advanced Manned Launch Systems, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 32,No. 2, pp. 241–249, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gregory, I. M., Chowdhry, R. S., and McMimm, J. D. Hypersonic Vehicle Model and Control Law Development Using H and μ-Synthesis, Technical Memorandum 4562, NASA, 1994.

  7. Miele, A., and Mancuso, S., Optimal Ascent Trajectories for a Single-Stage Suborbital Spacecraft, Aero-Astronautics Report 275, Rice University, 1997.

  8. Miele, A., Wang, T., and Basapur, V. K., Primal and Dual Formulations of Sequential Gradient-Restoration Algorithms for Trajectory Optimization Problems, Acta Astronautica, Vol. 13,No. 8, pp. 491–505, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Miele, A., and Wang, T., Primal-Dual Properties of Sequential Gradient-Restoration Algorithms for Optimal Control Problems, Part 1: Basic Problem, Integral Methods in Science and Engineering, Edited by F. R. Payne et al, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington, DC, pp. 577–607, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miele, A., and Wang, T., Primal-Dual Properties of Sequential Gradient-Restoration Algorithms for Optimal Control Problems, Part 2: General Problem, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 119,Nos. 1–2, pp. 21–54, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rishikof, B. H., McCormick, B. R., Pritchard, R. E., and Sponaugle, S. J., SEGRAM: A Practical and Versatile Tool for Spacecraft Trajectory Otpimization, Acta Astronautica, Vol. 26,Nos. 8–10, pp. 599–609, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miele, A., and Wang, T., Optimization and Acceleration Guidance of Flight Trajectories in a Windshear, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 10,No. 4, pp. 368–377, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Miele, A., and Wang, T., Acceleration, Gamma, and Theta Guidance for Abort Landing in a Windshear, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 12,No. 6, pp. 815–821, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Miele, A., and Wang, T., Penetration Landing Guidance Trajectories in the Presence of Windshear, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 12,No. 6, pp. 806–814, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Miele, A., and Wang, T., Gamma Guidance Schemes for Flight in a Windshear, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 11,No. 4, pp. 320–327, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miele, A., Lee, W. Y., and Wu, G. D., Optimal Trajectories for an Aerospace Plane, Part 1: Formulation, Results, and Analysis, Aero-Astronautics Report 247, Rice University, 1990.

  17. Miele, A., Lee, W. Y., and Wu, G. D., Optimal Trajectories for an Aerospace Plane, Part 2: Data, Tables and Graphs, Aero-Astronautics Report 248, Rice University, 1990.

  18. Miele, A., Lee, W. Y., and Wu, G. D., Ascent Performance Feasibility of the National Aerospace Plane, Atti della Accademia delle Scienze di Torino, vol. 131, pp. 91–108, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Miele, A., Recent Advances in the Optimization and Guidance of Aeroassisted Orbital Transfers, The 1st John V. Breakwell Memorial Lecture, Acta Astronautica, Vol. 38,No. 10, pp. 747–768, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Miele, A., and Wang, T., Nominal Trajectories for the Aeroassisted Flight Experiment, Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 41,No. 2, pp. 139–163, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Miele, A., and Wang, T., Near-Optimal Highly Robust Guidance for Aeroassisted Orbital Transfer, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 19,No. 3, pp. 549–556, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Miele, A., and Wang, T., Robust Predictor-Corrector Guidance for Aeroassisted Orbital Transfer, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 19,No. 5, pp. 1134–1141, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Miele, A., Editor, Special Issue on Hypervelocity Flight, Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 36,Nos. 1–2, pp. 1–197, 1988.

  24. Miele, A., and Salvetti, A., Editors, Applied Mathematics in Aerospace Sciences and Engineering, Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York, New York, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Miele, A., Optimal Trajectories of Aircraft and Spacecraft, Aircraft Trajectories: Computation, Prediction, and Control, Edited by A. Benoit, Agardograph AG-301, AGARD/NATO, Paris, France, Vol. 1, Chapter 2, pp. 1–56, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Miele, A., Flight Mechanics, Vol. 1: Theory of Flight Paths, Chapters 13 and 14, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Noaa, Nasa, and Usaf, US Standard Atmosphere, 1976, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miele, A., Mancuso, S. Optimal Ascent Trajectories and Feasibility of Next-Generation Orbital Spacecraft. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 97, 519–550 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022633924359

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022633924359

Navigation