Skip to main content
Log in

Rectification behaviour of some metal ion–metal interfaces and concentration cells

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rectification behaviour of three metal ion–metal interfaces and 38 concentration cells was studied. The rectification in Al∣Al3+∣Al was 35% (−0.4 to +0.80 V d.c.) between 2.0–5.0 V a.c. and for Zn∣Zn2+ ⋮ Al3+∣Al cell was 20% (+0.20 to −0.30 V d.c.). Its negative d.c. potential showed some similarity to a tunnel diode. 20% rectification was obtained when each of Al, Zn, Mg half-cell was coupled with I, I2∣Pt half-cell and Al half-cell was coupled with Fe3+, Fe2+∣Pt half-cell. When the Zn half-cell was associated with Cr3+, Cr2O7 2−∣Pt half-cell the rectification was 15%, whereas the rectification in all other concentration cells varied from 1 to 12%. The possibility of obtaining much higher percentage of rectification can be explored in a large number of other metal ion–metal interfaces and concentration cells which can be assembled in a similar manner using the table of standard reduction potentials. The characteristics of a concentration cell can be varied by change in concentration of metal ion, redox ratio, variation of pH, temperature, effect of different additives to the cell solution, irradiation of electrode surface etc. Consequently, it will affect the percentage of rectification which may be of some use in commercial applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K.S.G. Doss and H.P. Agarwal, J. Sci. Industr. Res. 9B (1950) 280.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G.C. Barker, in E. Yeager (Ed), ‘Transaction of the Symposium on Electrode Processes’ (J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1961), p. 325.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G.C. Barker, in G.J. Hills (Ed), ‘Polarography’ (Macmillan, London, 1964), p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D.E. Smith and W.H. Reinmuth, Anal. Chem. 33 (1962) 482.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Paynter and W.H. Reinmuth, Anal. Chem. 34 (1962) 1335.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Neeb, Naturwiss. 49 (1962) 447.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G.C. Barker and H.W. Nurnberg, Naturwiss. 51 (1964) 191.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y.Y. Gurevich and V.A. Myamlin, Dokl. Akad. Nauk., SSSR. 155 (1964) 1159.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Delahay, M. Senda and C.H. Weis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 83 (1961) 312.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Imai and P. Delahay, J. Phys. Chem. 66 (1962) 1683.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H.P. Agarwal, Electrochim. Acta 17 (1972) 285.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H.P. Agarwal, Electrochim. Acta 16 (1971) 1395.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H.P. Agarwal, in A.J. Bard (Ed), ‘Electroanalytical Chemistry – a series of Advances', Vol. 7 (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1974), pp. 161–271.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H.P. Agarwal and P.K. Jain, Electrochim. Acta 26 (1981) 621.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H.P. Agarwal and M. Saxena, Ind. J. Chem. 16A (1978) 754.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H.P. Agarwal, in J.O'M. Bockris (Ed), ‘Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry’, No. 20 (Plenum Press, New York, 1989), pp. 177–263.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K.K. Agarwal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agarwal, K., Agarwal, H. Rectification behaviour of some metal ion–metal interfaces and concentration cells. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 32, 1379–1382 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022630006302

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022630006302

Navigation