Skip to main content
Log in

A Differential R&D Game: Implications for Knowledge-Based Growth Models

  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper compares the outcomes of strategic and nonstrategic research and development (R&D). Firms undertake cost-reducing R&D in an environment where benefits accrue from their rivals' R&D via a common pool of knowledge. We demonstrate that multiple suboptimal equilibria exist; under these conditions, growth models which do not consider strategic interactions will overestimate or underestimate the growth rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Solow, R., Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 39, pp. 312–330, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Denison, E. F., Why Growth Rates Differ, 1st Edition, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lucas, R. E., Jr., On the Mechanics of Economic Development, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 22, pp. 3–42, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Xie, D., Divergence in Economic Performance: Transitional Dynamics with Multiple Equilibria, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 63, pp. 97–112, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Romer, P. M., Endogenous Technological Change, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, pp. S71-S102, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barro, R. J., Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, pp. 103–125, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stokey, L. N., Human Capital, Product Quality, and Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. CV12, pp. xxx-xxx, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smulders, S., and Van de Klundert, T., Imperfect Competition, Concentration and Growth with Firm-Specific R&D, European Economic Review, Vol. 39, pp. 139–160, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bernstein, J. I., and Nadiri, I. M., Research and Development and Intra-Industry Spillovers: An Empirical Application of Dynamic Duality, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 56, pp. 249–269, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nadiri, I. M., Innovations and Technological Spillovers, Research Report 93–31, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, 1993.

  11. Bernstein, J. I., Costs of Production, Intra-and Inter-Industry R&D Spillovers: Canadian Evidence, Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 21, pp. 325–347, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Romer, P. M., New Goods and the Welfare Costs of Trade Restrictions, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 43, pp. 312–330, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kamien, N. I., and Schwartz, N. L., Dynamic Optimization, the Calculus of Variations, and Optimal Control in Economics and Management, North-Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reinganum, J., A Dynamic Game of R&D: Patent Protection and Competitive Behavior, Econometrica, Vol. 50, pp. 671–688, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tolwinski, B., and Zaccour, G., Learning from Each Other in a Duopoly: A Numerical Approach, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 63, pp. 97–112, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tsutsui, S., and Mino, K., Nonlinear Strategies in Dynamic Duopolistic Competition with Sticky Prices, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 52, pp. 136–161, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dockner, E. J., and Long, N. V., International Pollution Control: Cooperative Versus Noncooperative Strategies, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 25, pp. 13–29, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vencatachellum, D. A Differential R&D Game: Implications for Knowledge-Based Growth Models. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 96, 175–189 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022623419371

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022623419371

Navigation