Skip to main content
Log in

Quality of Life Among Government Employees

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to examine distinctive aspects of the quality of life (QOL) of Korean government employees utilizing in large part many features of the 1999 QOL survey of Korean government and private sector employees. To this end, responses of government and private sector employees regarding various dimensions of QOL are compared. This study finds that the QOL of government employees is significantly lower than that of private sector employees. The result of regression analysis of QOL dimensions shows that the level of satisfaction with one's work environment is the most influential determinant of the overall QOL of Korean government employees. Based on this finding, this study recommends that the government agencies consider improving their employees' work-related environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Cho, K.H.: 1997, The Values of Public Employees in the Era of Transformation (Jibmoon, Seoul, Korea).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, K.H.: 2000, 'An analysis of the prospects of success of entrepreneurial reform efforts in the public personnel administration', Korean Public Administration Review 34(3), pp. 39-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, K.H. and M.S. Kim: 2000, 'A comparative study of quality of life satisfaction between the public and private sector employees', Korean Public Administration Review 34(3), pp. 27-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S.H. and W.Y. Oh: 1993, 'An analysis of citizen satisfaction about urban environments', Land Development 28(4), pp. 161-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chubb, J.E. and T.M. Moe: 1988, 'Politics, markets, and the organization of schools', American Political Science Review 82, pp. 1065-1088.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, M. and J. Wooldridge: 1995, 'Surveying consumer satisfaction to assess managed-care quality: Current practices', Health Care Financing Review 16(4), pp. 155-173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha, H.S.: 1996, '“Local governments” policy outcomes', unpublished doctoral dissertation (Seoul National University).

  • Haas, B.K.: 1999, 'Clarification and integration of similar quality-of-life concepts', Journal of Nursing Scholarship 31, pp. 215-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, B.S.: 1994, 'Psychological burnout and job involvement for public officials', Korean Public Administration Review 28, pp. 1279-1299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M.S. and K.H. Cho: 2000, Administrative Reform and the Quality of Life of Public Employees (Nanam Publishing House, Seoul, Korea).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.H. and associates: 1998, 'A comparative study on the quality of urban life', Regional Studies 14(1), pp. 21-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korea Civil Service Commission: 1999, Improvement of Public Sector Classification System (Seoul, Korea).

  • Lane, R.E.: 1994, 'Quality of life and quality of persons: A new role for government?' Political Theory 22(2).

  • Lee, S.M.: 1997, 'The quality of working life and the quality of life: A search of an comprehensive model', Social Science (Sung Kyun Kwan University, Seoul) 45, pp. 107-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, H.S.: 1995, Korean Social Change and the Values (Naman Publishing House, Seoul, Korea).

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, T.H. and S.Y. Won: 2000, 'Interpersonal trust and connections based on the social categorization in organizations', Korean Public Administration Review 34(2), pp. 101-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, B.Z. and W.H. Schmidt: 1996, 'The values of business and federal government executives', Public Personnel Management 25(3), pp. 277-289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poister, T.H. and G.T. Henry: 1994, 'Citizen ratings of public and private service quality: A comparative perspective', Public Administration Review 54(2), pp. 155-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainey, H.G., S. Pandey and B. Bozeman: 1995, 'Research note: Public and private managers' perception of red tape', Public Administration Review 55, pp. 567-574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D.S. and B.C. Vaught: 1993, 'A comparison of job satisfaction between public and private sector managers', Public Administration Quarterly, Spring, pp. 68-83.

  • Seed, P. and G. Lloyd: 1997, Quality of Life (Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, D.S.: 1981, 'A study of quality of life of Koreans', Jung-Kyung Moonwha, pp. 26-47.

  • United States Merit Systems Protection Board: 1991, Balancing Work Responsibilities and Family Needs: The Federal Civil Service Response.

  • United States Office of Personnel Management: 1998, A Review of Federal Family-Friendly Workplace Arrangements.

  • Webb, K. and H.P. Hatry: 1973, Obtaining Citizen Feedback: The Application of Citizen Surveys to Local Governments (The Urban Institute, Washington, D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, M., Cho, KH. Quality of Life Among Government Employees. Social Indicators Research 62, 387–409 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022613721491

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022613721491

Keywords

Navigation