Skip to main content
Log in

Differential Effect of Common Laboratory Treatments on Hypoosmotic Swelling Responses of Human Spermatozoa

  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: The impact of some of the common laboratory interventions on the hypoosmotic swelling (HOS) responses of human-spermatozoa was investigated.

Methods: The semen samples underwent different laboratory treatments prior to the standard HOS test, which involved incubation of sperm in the hypoosmotic solution. Fresh semen served as a control for all treatment groups and underwent the same HOS procedure. The HOS-reactive spermatozoa and the type of HOS reactions (swelling types) in each group were identified under a phase-contrast microscope for comparison.

Results: All the seven types of HOS responses documented in fresh semen sperm also occurred in the laboratory-processed sperm. The total HOS responses of sperm that underwent cryopreservation, heat shock, and Percoll wash were significantly different from those of the corresponding control. Percoll washing of semen influenced HOS subtypes a and g; cryopreservation affected subtypes a, b, c, and d; and heat shock altered subtypes a, f, and g. In contrast, prolonged postejaculation and cold shock did not affect any of the HOS responses. None of the treatments influenced the d and e responses.

Conclusions: These results indicate that the total HOS response value and specific response subtypes are significantly affected by some of the laboratory treatments but not others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Jeyendran RS, Perez-Pelaez M, Crabo BG, Zaneveld LJD: Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membranes and its relationship to other semen characteristics. J Reprod Fert 1984;70:219–228

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jeyendran RS, Van der Ven HH, Zaneveld LJD: The hypoosmotic swelling test: An update. Arch Androl 1992;29:105–116

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mladennnovic I, Micic S, Genav O, Papic N: Hypoosmotic swelling test for quality control of sperm prepared for assisted reproduction. Arch Androl 1995;34:163–169

    Google Scholar 

  4. Takahashi K, Uchida A, Kitao M: Hypoosmotic swelling test of sperm. Arch Androl 1990;25:225–242

    Google Scholar 

  5. Casper RF, Cowan L, Meriano JS, Lucato ML, Jarvi KA: The hypo-osmotic swelling test for selection of viable sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with complete asthenozoospermia. Fertil Steril 1996;65:972–976

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mordel N, Shemesh A, Dano I, Schenker JG, Epstein-Eldan M, Laufer N: Novel parameters of human sperm hypoosmotic swelling test and their correlation to standard spermatogram, total motile sperm fraction, and sperm penetration assay. Fertil Steril 1993;59:1276–1279

    Google Scholar 

  7. Check ML, Check JH: Poor hypo-osmotic swelling test results from cryopreserved sperm despite preservation of sperm motility. Arch Androl 1991;26:37–41

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chan SYW, Wang C, Fox EJ, Tang LCH, Chan MMC, Tang GWC: The relationship between the human sperm hypoosmotic swelling test, routine semen analysis, and the human sperm zona-free hamster ovum penetration assay. Fertil Steril 1985;44:668–672

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fuse H, Kazama T, Katayama T: Relationship between hypoosmotic swelling test, semen analysis, and zona-free hamster ovum test. Arch Androl 1991;27:73–78

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jager S, Kremer J, Mijehman J: Hypoosmotic sperm swelling test does not assess fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa. Arch Androl 1991;26:195–197

    Google Scholar 

  11. Check DJ, Kiefer D, Katsoff D, Check JH: Effect of pentoxyfylline added to freezing media on subsequent post-thaw hypoosmotic swelling test and other semen parameters. Arch Androl 1995;35:161–163

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kiefer D, Check JH, Katsoff D: The value of motile density, strict morphology, and the hypoosmotic swelling test in in vitro fertilization embryo transfer. Arch Androl 1996;37:57–60

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vantman D, Zinaman M, Sherins R: Dissociation of hypoosmotic tail swelling patterns in sperm from fertile and infertile men. J Androl 1987;8 (Suppl):24

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fuse H, Okumura M, Kazama T, Katayama T: Correlation of seminal plasma transferrin concentration on hypoosmotic swelling of sperm. Arch Androl 1994;32:95–100

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hossain A, Huff C, Rizk B: Fractions of Percoll eliminated sperm: increased Sperm yield in Percoll wash. Arch Androl 1996;37:189–195

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hossain A, Barik S, Rizk B, Thorneycroft IH: Evidence of time course morphological changes in human sperm tails when exposed to hypo-osmotic treatment. Hum Reprod 1998;13 (in press)

  17. Fuse H, Kazama T, Katayama T: Hypo-osmotic swelling test in patients with varicocele. Arch Androl 1991;27:149–154

    Google Scholar 

  18. Check JH, Lurie D, Baker A, Katsoff D, Benfer K: Transfer of cryopreserved embryos improved pregnancy rates in patients with damage to the functional integrity of the sperm membrane as measured by the hypo-osmotic swelling test. Fertil Steril 1996;65:1241–1244

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hossain, A.M., Selukar, R. & Barik, S. Differential Effect of Common Laboratory Treatments on Hypoosmotic Swelling Responses of Human Spermatozoa. J Assist Reprod Genet 16, 30–34 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022593528713

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022593528713

Navigation