Skip to main content
Log in

Multifocal electroretinography in central serous chorio-retinopathy and assessment of the reproducibility of the multifocal electroretinography

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: To measure and compare the difference of multifocal electroretinography (mERG) in control subjects and patients with central serous chorio-retinopathy(CSCR) and assessing the reproducibility of the multifocal electroretinography. Methods: Sixteen cases of control subjects and 12 cases of central serous chorio-retinopathy were tested with the Visual Evoked Response Imaging System science™4.2 made by EDI company of America. The results of the left eye of each control subject and patient were used for statistical evaluation by the Mann–Whitney U test. Repeat measurements were performed on 11 control subjects. Wilcoxon technique were used to quantify the reproducibility of the test. Results: The P1 waveform average response density of 1–3 rings in central serous chorio-retinopathy were decreased statistically. There was no significant difference between repeat measurements on 11 individuals. Conclusion: Multifocal electroretinography can be used to quantify the visual function of the affected area in chorio-retinopathy and showed good agreement in the data distribution for the repeat measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sandberg MA, Ariel M. A hand-held two channel stimulator ophthalmoscope. Arch Ophthalmol 1979; 95: 1881–1883.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Parks S, Keating D, Williamson TH, et al. Functional imaging of the retina using the multifocal eletroretinograph: a control study. Br J Ophthalmol 1996; 80: 831–4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sutter EE, Tran D. The field topography of ERG components in man-I. The photopic luminance response. Vision Res 1992; 32: 433–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jacobi PC, Mlezek KD, Zrenner E. Experiences with the international standard for clinical ectroretinography: normative values for clinical practice, interindividual and intraindividual variations and possibile extension. Doc Ophthalmol 1993; 85: 95–114.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hasegawa S, Obsbima A, Hayakawa Y, et al. Multifocal eletroretinogram in patients with branch retinal artery occlusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001; 42: 298–304.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sutter EE. The interpretation of multifocal binary kernels. Doc Ophthalmol 2000, 100: 49–75.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Marmor MF, Tan F. Central serous chorioretinopathy: Bilateral multifocal electroretinographic abnormalities. Arch Ophthalmol 1999; 117: 184–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Parks S, Keating D, Williamson TH, et al. Functional imaging of the retina using the multifocal eletroretinograph: a control study. Br J Ophthalmol 1996; 80: 831–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, W., Zhao, K. Multifocal electroretinography in central serous chorio-retinopathy and assessment of the reproducibility of the multifocal electroretinography. Doc Ophthalmol 106, 209–213 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022592310917

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022592310917

Navigation