Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of FISH, PRINS, and Conventional and Fluorescent PCR for Single-Cell Sexing: Suitability for Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis

  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: Although conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was the first method used for sexing in preimplantation genetic diagnosis, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) has become the method of choice. Recently two new techniques, primed in situ synthesis (PRINS) and fluorescent PCR, have been developed. This study compares the reliability and accuracy of these four techniques in single cells.

Results: In buccal cells, fluorescent PCR and FISH had similar reliability (94 and 93%) and accuracy (97 and 96%) rates. The reliability and accuracy of PRINS (91 and 25%) and conventional PCR (79 and 89%) were lower. In human blastomeres, FISH and flourescent PCR had similar reliability (100%, 717; 95%, 190/201) rates. Accuracy rates were 71% (5/7) and 99% (188/190) for FISH and fluorescent PCR, respectively, however, too few blastomeres were analyzed by FISH for meaningful comparison. However, when these data are compared with published data, the method of choice for blastomere sexing appears to be fluorescent PCR.

Conclusions: Flouroscent PCR has major implications for PGD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Handyside AH, Delhanty JDA: Cleavage stage biopsy of preimplantation embryos and diagnosis of X chromosome-linked recessive disease. In Preconception and Preimplantation Diagnosis of Human Genetic Disease, RG Edwards (ed). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp 239-270

    Google Scholar 

  2. Strom CM, Verlinsky Y, Milayeva-Rechitsky S, Evsikov S, Cieslak J, Lifchez A, Valle J, Moise J, Ginsberg N, Applebaum M: Preconception genetic analysis for cystic fibrosis by polar body removal and DNA analysis. Lancet 1990;336:306-307

    Google Scholar 

  3. Handyside AH, Lesko JG, Tarin JJ, Winston RML, Hughes M: Birth of a normal girl after in vitro fertilisation and preimplantation diagnosis testing for cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med 1992;327:905-909

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grifo JA, Tang YX, Munne S, Alikani M, Cohen J, Rosenwaks Z: Healthy deliveries from biopsied human embryos. Hum Reprod 1994;9(5):912-916

    Google Scholar 

  5. Munne S, Weier HU, Stein J, Grifo J, Cohen J: A fast and efficient method for simultaneous X and Y in situ hybridization of human blastomeres. J Assist Reprod Genet 1993;10(1):82-90

    Google Scholar 

  6. Delhanty J, Griffin D, Handyside A, Harper J, Atkinson G, Pieters M, Winston R: Detection of anaploidy and mosaicism in human embryos during preimplantation sex determination by FISH. Hum Mol Genet 1993;2(8):1183-1185

    Google Scholar 

  7. Delhanty JDA, Handyside, AH, Winston RML: Preimplantation diagnosis. Lancet 1994;343(8912):1569-1570

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harper JC, Coonen E, Ramaekers FCS, Delhanty JDA, Handyside AH, Winston RML, Hopman AHN: Identification of the sex of human preimplantation embryos in 2 hours using an improved spreading method and fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) using directly labeled probes. Hum Reprod 1994;9(4):721-724

    Google Scholar 

  9. Verlinsky Y, Rechitsky S, Freidine M, Strom C, Cieslak J, Lifchez A: Birth of a healthy girl after preimplantation gender determination using a combination of PCR and FISH. Fertil Steril 1996;65(2):358-360

    Google Scholar 

  10. Delhanty JDA, Harper JC, Ao A, Handyside AH, Winston RML: Multicolour FISH detects frequent chromosomal mosaicism and chaotic division in normal preimplantation embryos from fertile patients. Hum Genet 1997;99(6):755-760

    Google Scholar 

  11. Koch J, Hindkjaer J, Morgensen J, Kolvraa S, Bolund L: An improved method for chromosome specific labelling of alpha satellite DNA in situ by using denatured double stranded DNA probes as primers in PRINS. Genetl Anal Tech Appl 1991;8(6):171-178

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hindkjaer J, Koch J, Terkelsen C, Brandt CA, Kolvraa S, Bolund L: Fast, sensitive multicolour detection of nucleic acids in situ, by PRINS. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1994;66:152-154

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cinti C, Santi S, Maraldi NM: Localisation of a single gene copy by the PRINS technique. Nucleic Acid Res 1993;21:5799-5800

    Google Scholar 

  14. Volpi EC, Baldini A: Multi PRINS as a method for multi colour primed in situ labelling. Chromosome Res 1993;1(4):257-260

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pellestor F, Girardet A, Andreo B, Arnai F, Humeau C: Relationship between morphology and chromosome constitution in human preimplantation embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 1994;39(2):141-146

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pellestor F, Girardet A, Andreo B, Lefort G, Charlieu JP: Preimplantation embryo chromosome analysis by PRINS labelling method. Fertil Steril 1996;66(5):781-786

    Google Scholar 

  17. Saiki R, Scharf S, Faloona F, Mullis K, Hom G, Erlich H, Arnheim N: Enzymatic amplification of beta-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science 1985;230:1350-1354

    Google Scholar 

  18. Li A, Gyllensten UB, Cui X, Saiki RK, Erlich HA, Arnheim N: Amplification and analysis of DNA sequences in single human sperm and diploid cells. Nature 1988;335:414-419

    Google Scholar 

  19. Arnheim N, Li H, Cui X: Genetic-mapping by single sperm typing Anim Genet 1991;22(2):105-115

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tracy TE, Mulcahy LS: A simple method for direct automated sequencing of PCR fragments. Biotechniques 1991;11(1):68-75

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zeigle JS, Su Y, Corcoran KP, Nie L, Mayrand PE, Hoff LB, McBride LJ, Kronick MN, Diehl SR: Application of automated DNA sizing technology for genotyping microsatellite loci. Genomics 1992;14(4):1026-1031

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kimpton CP, Gill P, Walton A, Urquhart A, Millican ES, Adams M: Automated DNA profiling employing multiplex amplification of short tandem repeat loci. PCR Methods Appl 1993;13:13-22

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hattori M, Yoshioka K, Sakaki Y: Highly-sensitive fluorescent DNA sequencing and its application for detection and mass-screening of point mutations. Electrophoresis 1992;13(8):560-565

    Google Scholar 

  24. Findlay I, Quirke P: Fluorescent polymerase chain reaction. Part 1. A new method allowing genetic diagnosis and DNA fingerprinting of single cells. Hum Reprod (update) 1996;2(2):137-152

    Google Scholar 

  25. Findlay I, Lewis F, Quirke P, Rutherford A, Lilford R: Simultaneous DNA fingerprinting and diagnosis of sex and cystic fibrosis status from a single cell: Applications for pre-implantation diagnosis. Hum Reprod 1994;9(3):23

    Google Scholar 

  26. Findlay I, Pierre R, Quirke P, Rutherford A, Lilford R: Allelic dropout and preferential amplification in single cells and human blastomeres: Implications for preimplantation diagnosis of sex and cystic fibrosis. Hum Reprod 1995;10(6):1609-1618

    Google Scholar 

  27. Findlay I., Frazier R., Taylor A, Quirke P., Urquhart A: Single cell DNA fingerprinting for forensic applications. Nature (1997;389:355-356

    Google Scholar 

  28. Handyside AH, Penketh RJA, Winston RML, Pattison JK, Delhanty JDA, Tuddenham EGD: Biopsy of human preimplantation embryos and sexing by DNA amplification. Lancet 1989;8634:347-349

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Findlay, I., Corby, N., Rutherford, A. et al. Comparison of FISH, PRINS, and Conventional and Fluorescent PCR for Single-Cell Sexing: Suitability for Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. J Assist Reprod Genet 15, 258–265 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022584225311

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022584225311

Navigation