Student Scientist Partnerships and Data Quality

  • James G. Lawless
  • Barrett N. Rock


The Student Scientist Partnership introduces students to hands-on, minds-on science and provides them an opportunity to participate in a program that is real and important, and also introduces the student to the rigor of science through the focus on data quality. The student has the opportunity to experience and learn the Scientific Method, not just memorize it, to stimulate creative thinking, inquiry based learning, and many other key components of the educational objectives. The scientist should provide skill appropriate scientific inquiry tools that the student uses to help them improve the quality of their data and to understand the science concept being addressed. By making the measurements suggested, and establishing the quality of their data, the student begins the journey of understanding scientific research. The scientist not only uses the student-generated data in their on-going research activities, but also provides higher level information products back to the student. Ultimately, it must be clearly remembered that there are two important but quite different objectives for both the student and the scientist. For the student, the primary objective is the generation of the knowledge of science, while, for the research scientist, the primary objective is the generation of scientific knowledge.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Oxford Press, New York, New York.Google Scholar
  2. —. (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy. Oxford Press, New York, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Barrett, E. C. (1994). Special Edition Editor. The First WetNet Precipitation Intercomparison Project (PIP-1). Remote Sens. Rev. 11: 303pp.Google Scholar
  4. Barstow, D. and Tinker, R. (1997). National Conference on Student and Scientist Partnerships: Conference Report. TERC, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 147pp.Google Scholar
  5. Budd, R., Fried, A., Becker, M. L., and Congalton, R. G. (1996). Validating Remotely Sensed Environmental Data: The GLOBE Initiative. Proceedings of Eco—Informa '96. 10: 497–502.Google Scholar
  6. Congalton, R. G. and Becker, M. L. (1996). Validating Student Data for Scientific Use: An Example from the GLOBE Program. Internet Pathways to Science Education: Student-Scientist Partnerships, In K. C. Cohen, Ed., Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Federal Coordinating Council for Science, Engineering and Technology (FCCSET). (1992). By the year 2000: First in the World: Report of the FCCSET Committee on Education and Human Resources. Govt. Printing Office, 51pp.Google Scholar
  8. GLOBE. (1996). Global Learning and Observation to Benefit the Environment: GLOBE Teachers Guide. The GLOBE Program Office, Washington, D.C. 300pp.Google Scholar
  9. Groisman, P. Y. and Legates, D. R. 1994. The Accuracy of United States Precipitation Data. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 75: 215–227.Google Scholar
  10. Lawless, J. G. (1996). Unpublished private communication with students, teachers, educators, and scientists that are participating in the GLOBE Program.Google Scholar
  11. Lawless, J. G. and Coppola, R. (1996a). GLOBE: Earth as our Backyard. Geotimes. 41(9): 28–30.Google Scholar
  12. Lawless, J. G., and Coppola, R. (1996b). Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE): An International Environmental Science Research and Science Education Program. Proceedings of Eco—Informa '96. 10: 503–507.Google Scholar
  13. Morrissey, M. L., Shafer, M. A., Postawko, S., and Gibson, B. (1993). The Comprehensive Pacific Rainfall Data Base. Oklahoma Climatological Survey Technical Report No. 92–003. Norman, Oklahoma. 19pp.Google Scholar
  14. Morrissey, M., Shafer, M. A., Postawko, S., and Gibson, B. (1995). The Pacific Rain Gage Rainfall Database. Water Resources Research. 31: 2111–2113.Google Scholar
  15. National Research Council (NRC). (1995). National Science Education Standards, Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  16. NWS (National Weather Service). (1996). Cooperative Observer Program. Personal communication.Google Scholar
  17. Postawko, S., Morrissey, M., and Gibson, B. (1994). The Schools of the Pacific Rainfall Climate Experiment: Combining Research and Education. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 75: 1260–1266.Google Scholar
  18. Raloff, J. (1996). Precollege science and math “lack focus.” Science News, 150: 244.Google Scholar
  19. Rock, B. N., and Lauten, G. N. (1996). K-12th grade students as contributors to research investigations. Journ. Sci. Education and Technology. 5(4): 255–266.Google Scholar
  20. Rock, B. N., Blackwell, T. R., Miller, D., and Hardison, A. (1996). The GLOBE Program: a Model for International Environmental Education. In K. C. Cohen, Ed., Internet Pathways to Science Education: Student-Scientist Partnerships, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Snow, J. T., and Harley, B. (1988). Basic Meteorological Observation for Schools: Rainfall. Bull Amer. Meteor. Soc. 69: 497–507.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • James G. Lawless
  • Barrett N. Rock

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations