Abstract
Party identification is a standard part of our understanding of presidential voting, but the effects of presidential incumbency on presidential voting have not been recognized in most voting models. Democratic candidates in the twentieth century received 10 percent more of the two-party vote when Democratic incumbents were running for reelection than when Republican incumbents were running. National Election Studies surveys show that the effect of incumbency varies with individual partisanship, with the greatest effect, as expected, among independents. Opposition party identifiers defect at a higher rate than incumbent party identifiers when the incumbent is running for reelection. Even after controlling for retrospective and prospective economic voting, a 6 percent effect is found for incumbency. Incumbency thus conditions the impact of partisanship on presidential voting.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Abramowitz, Alan (1996). Bill and Al's excellent adventure: forecasting the 1996 presidential election. American Politics Quarterly 24: 434–442.
Abramson, Paul R., Aldrich, John H., and Rohde, David W. (1998). Change and Continuity in the 1996 Elections. Washington DC: CQ Press.
Bartels, Larry M. (1996). Uninformed votes: information effects in presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science 40: 194–230.
Bartels, Larry M. (2000). Partisanship and voting behavior, 1952-1996. American Journal of Political Science 44: 35–50.
Beck, Paul Allen (1986). Choice, context, and consequence: beaten and unbeaten paths toward a science of electoral behavior. In Herbert F. Weisberg (ed.), Political Science: The Science of Politics, pp. 241–283. New York: Agathon Press.
Brody, Richard A. (1991). Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. (1960). The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
Campbell, Angus, Gurin, Gerald, and Miller, Warren E. (1954). The Voter Decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
Campbell, James E. (2000). The American Campaign: U.S. Presidential Elections and the National Vote. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
Cover, Albert D. (1977). One good term deserves another: the advantage of incumbency in congressional elections. American Journal of Political Science 21: 523–541.
Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Fiorina, Morris P. (1981). Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Green, Donald, Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric (2002). Partisan Hearts and Minds Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Jacobson, Gary C. (2001). The Politics of Congressional Elections, 5th ed. New York: Longman.
Keith, Bruce E., Magleby, David B., Nelson, Candice J., Orr, Elizabeth, Westlye, Mark C., and Wolfinger, Raymond E. (1992). The Myth of the Independent Voter. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Key, V.O., Jr. (1964). Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups, 5th ed. New York: Crowell.
Key, V.O., Jr. (1966). The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mann, Thomas, and Wolfinger, Raymond (1980). Candidates and parties in congressional elections. American Political Science Review 74: 617–632.
Markus, Gregory B. (1988). The impact of personal and national economic conditions on the presidential vote: a pooled cross-sectional analysis. American Journal of Political Science 32: 137–154.
Mattei, Franco, and Weisberg, Herbert F. (1994). Presidential succession effects in voting. British Journal of Political Science 24: 269–290.
Mayhew, David (1974). Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Miller, Warren E. (1991). Party identification, realignment, and party voting: back to the basics. American Political Science Review 85: 557–568.
Miller, Warren E., and Shanks, J. Merrill (1996). The New American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nadeau, Richard, and Lewis-Beck, Michael (2001). National economic voting in U.S. presidential elections. Journal of Politics 63: 159–181.
Norpoth, Helmut (1996). It's Bill Clinton, stupid! Forecasting the 1996 presidential election. Paper presented at the 1996 Annual Meetings of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Peters, John G., and Welch, Susan (1980). The effects of charges of corruption on voting behavior in congressional elections. American Political Science Review 74: 697–708.
Petrocik, John R. (1974). An analysis of the intransitivities in the index of party identification. Political Methodology 1:31–47.
Sniderman, Paul, Glaser, James, and Griffin, Robert (1991). Information and electoral choice. In Paul Sniderman, Richard Brody, and Philip Tetlock (eds.), Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology, pp. 164–178. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tufte, Edward (1978). Political Control of the Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wayne, Stephen J. (2001). The Road to the White House, 2000: The Politics of Presidential Elections, post-election ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's.
Weisberg, Herbert F. (2001). Reelection and succession in U.S. presidential elections. Paper presented at the 2001 Annual Meetings of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Weisberg, Herbert F., and Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. (1999). Reelection: the 1996 U.S. election. In Herbert F. Weisberg and Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier (eds.), Reelection 1996, pp. 1–20. New York: Chatham House.
Weisberg, Herbert F., and Hill, Timothy (forthcoming). The succession presidential election of 2000: the battle of the legacies. In Herbert F. Weisberg and Clyde Wilcox (eds.), Models of Voting in Presidential Elections. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Zaller, John R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weisberg, H.F. Partisanship and Incumbency in Presidential Elections. Political Behavior 24, 339–360 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022558810957
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022558810957