Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Jurors' Perceptions of Adolescent Sexual Assault Victims Who Have Intellectual Disabilities

  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

Children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities are especially likely to be sexually abused. Even so, their claims are not likely to be heard in court, possibly because people assume that jurors will not believe them. We tested this assumption in a mock-trial study in which 160 men and women watched videotaped excerpts from an actual trial. As predicted, when the 16-year-old sexual assault victim was portrayed as “mildly mentally retarded” instead of as “having average intelligence,” jurors were more likely to vote guilty and had more confidence in the defendant's guilt; considered the victim to be more credible and the defendant to be less credible as witnesses; and rated the victim as more honest, less capable of fabricating the sexual abuse accusation, and less likely to have fabricated the sexual abuse accusation. Men and women were affected similarly by the disability manipulation, but women were generally more pro-prosecution in their case judgments and perceptions than were men. Finally, jurors who had more liberal views toward persons with disabilities were more likely than other jurors to make pro-prosecution judgments on measures of guilt. Implications for psychological theory and the law are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Amato, P. R. (1979). Juror-defendant similarity and the assessment of guilt in politically motivated crimes. Australian Journal of Psychology, 31, 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Lawyer/Court TV Video Library Service. (1992). Kentucky v. English Trial Story [motion picture]. Available from Courtroom Television Network, 600 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10016.

  • Antonak, R. F., Fiedler, C. R., & Mulick, J. A. (1989). Misconceptions relating to mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 27, 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroff, G. S. (1986). Mental retardation: Nature, cause, and management (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenney, D. A. (1986). The mediator–moderator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, N. R. (1990). Sexuality in adolescent retardates. In M. Sugar (Ed.), Atypical adolescence and sexuality (pp. 44–56). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, B. (1987). The conquest of mental retardation. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgida, E., & Brekke, N. (1985). Psycholegal research on rape trials. In A. Burgess (Ed.), Rape and sexual assault: A research handbook (pp. 313–342). New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, B. H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23, 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms, B. L. (1993). Individual differences in perceptions of child sexual assault victims. In G. S. Goodman & B. L. Bottoms (Eds.), Child victims, child witnesses: Understanding and improving children's eyewitness testimony (pp. 229–261). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms, B. L., Davis, S., & Epstein, M. E. (in press). Race and jurors' decisions in child sexual abuse cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

  • Bottoms, B. L., & Goodman, G. S. (1994). Perceptions of children's credibility in sexual assault cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 702–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms, B. L., Schmidt, E., & Epstein, M. A. (1998, March). Effect of juror gender and verdict preference on persuasion during deliberations in child abuse trials. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the American Psychology/Law Society, Redondo Beach, CA.

  • Brantlinger, E. A. (1985). Mildly mentally retarded secondary students' information about and attitudes toward sexuality and sexuality education. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 20, 99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brigham, J. C. (1998). Adults' evaluations of characteristics of children's memory. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 19, 15–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H., Stein, J., & Turk, V. (1995). The sexual abuse of adults with learning disabilities. Mental Handicap Research, 8, 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women and rape. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corder, B. F., & Whiteside, R. (1988). A survey of jurors' perception of issues related to child sexual abuse. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 6, 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Dexter, H. R. (1990). Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 184–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dent, H. R. (1986). An experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of questioning mentally handicapped child witnesses. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25, 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, S. S. (1997). Illuminations and shadows from jury simulations. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 561–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, L. M. III, Aubrey, M., Doherty, E., Isquith, P., Levine, M., & Scheiner, J. (1989). The credibility of children as witnesses in a simulated child sex abuse trial. In S. Ceci, D. Ross, & M. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 71–99). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericson, K. I., & Perlman, N. B. (2001). Knowledge of legal terminology and court proceedings in adults with developmental disabilities. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 529–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina, A., Thaw, J., Felner, R. D., & Hust, B. E. (1976). Some interpersonal consequences of being mentally ill or mentally retarded. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 80, 414–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelhor, D. (1984). Child sexual abuse: New theory and research. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, W. N., & Boriskin, J. A. (1978). Primary prevention of child abuse: Focus on the special child. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 29, 248–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabora, N. J., Spanos, N. P., & Joab, A. (1993). The effects of complainant age and expert psychological testimony in a simulated child sexual abuse trial. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 103–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, F. X., Sawin, L. G., & Gibbons, B. N. (1979). Evaluations of mentally retarded persons: “Sympathy” or patronization? American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 84, 124–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, J. M., Sanchez, R. P., & Sego, S. A. (1997). The believability of hearsay testimony in a child sexual assault trial. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 299–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, J. M., Sego, S. A., Sanchez, R. P., & Hasemann, D. (1995). The believability of repressed memories. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 569–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G. S., Golding, J. M., & Haith, M. M. (1984). Jurors' reactions to child witnesses. Journal of Social Issues, 40(2), 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G. S., Golding, J. M., Helgeson, V. S., Haith, M. M., & Michelli, J. (1987). When a child takes the stand: Jurors' perceptions of children's eyewitness testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, J., & Corman, L. (1975). Public attitudes toward mentally retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 80, 72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haegerich, T. M., & Bottoms, B. L. (2000). Empathy and jurors' decisions in patricide trials involving child sexual assault allegations. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 421–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, H. (1993). The potential impact of disability studies on political science (as well as vice versa). Policy Studies Journal, 21, 740–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, M. E., & Midlarsky, E. (1987). Differential impact of labels and behavioral descriptions on attitudes toward people with disabilities. Rehabilitation Psychology, 32, 227–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawaii v. Gonsalves, 706 P.2d 1333 (Hawaii Ct. App. 1985).

  • Henry, D., Keys, C., Balcazar, F., & Jopp, D. (1996). Attitudes of community-living staff members towards persons with mental retardation, mental illness, and dual diagnosis. Mental Retardation, 34, 367–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, D., Keys, C., Jopp, D., & Balcazar, F. (1996). The community living attitudes scale, mental retardation form: Development and psychometric properties. Mental Retardation, 34, 149–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illinois v. Spencer, 457 N.E.2d 473 (III. Ct. App. 1983).

  • Isquith, P. (1988, April). Students and community members as jurors. In M. Levine (Chair), Simulated jury research on a child as a witness. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Buffalo, NY.

  • Isquith, P. K., Levine, M., & Scheiner, J. (1993). Blaming the child: Attribution of responsibility to victims of child sexual abuse. In G. S. Goodman & B. L. Bottoms (Eds.), Child victims, child witnesses (pp. 203–228). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kail, R. (1990). The development of memory in children (3rd ed.). New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S. M., Rigby, S., & Castillo, S. R. (1991). The accuracy–confidence correlation in eyewitness testimony: Limits and extensions of the retrospective self-awareness effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 698–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kebbell, M. R., & Hatton, C. (1999). People with mental retardation as witnesses in court: A review. Mental Retardation, 37, 179–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keilty, J., & Connelly, G. (2001). Making a statement: An exploratory study of barriers facing women with an intellectual disability when making a statement about sexual assault to police. Disability and Society, 16, 273–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, N. L., Hymes, R. W., Anderson, A. B., & Weathers, J. E. (1995). Defendant–juror similarity and mock juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 545–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keys, C., Henry, D., Horner-Johnson, W., & Tegart, G. M. (2001). Facets of inclusion attitudes toward people with intellectual disabilities: Longitudinal relations. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Kovera, M. B., Borgida, E., Gresham, A. W., Swim, J., & Regan, P. C. (1993). Do child sexual abuse experts hold pro-child beliefs? A survey of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 6, 383–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leippe, M. R., Brigham, J. C., Cousins, C., & Romanczyk, A. (1989). The opinions and practices of criminal attorneys regarding child eyewitnesses: A survey. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 100–130). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leippe, M. R., & Romanczyk, A. (1987). Children on the witness stand: A communication/persuasion analysis of jurors' reactions to child witnesses. In S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross (Eds.), Children's eyewitness memory (pp. 155–177). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leippe, M. R., & Romanczyk, A. (1989). Reactions to child (versus adult) eyewitnesses: The influence of jurors' preconceptions and witness behavior. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 103–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., & Walker, L. (1979). Theory testing, theory development, and laboratory research on legal issues. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, R. C. L., Ross, D. F., Lea, J. A., & Carr, C. (1995). What's fair when a child testifies? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 870–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louisiana v. Peters, 441 So.2d 403 (La. Ct. App. 1986).

  • McCauley, M. R., & Parker, J. F. (2001). When will a child be believed? The impact of the victim's age and jurors' gender on children's credibility and verdict in a sexual-abuse case. Child Abuse and Neglect, 25, 523–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNulty, C., Kissi-Deborah, R., & Newsom-Davies, I. (1995). Police involvement with clients having intellectual disabilities: A pilot study in South London. Mental Handicap Research, 8, 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michigan v. Karelse, 373 N.W.2d 200 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985).

  • Miller, G. R., & Burgoon, J. K. (1982). Factors affecting assessments of witness credibility. In N. L. Kerr & R. M. Bray (Eds.), The psychology of the courtroom (pp. 169–196). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monat-Haller, R. K. (1992). Understanding and expressing sexuality: Responsible choices for individuals with developmental disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J. E. B. (1997). Evidence in child abuse and neglect cases (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley Law Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J. E. B. (1998). Legal issues in child abuse and neglect (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nightingale, N. N. (1993). Juror reactions to child victim witnesses: Factors affecting trial outcome. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 679–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parish, T. S., Dyck, N., & Kappes, B. M. (1979). Stereotypes concerning normal and handicapped children. The Journal of Psychology, 102, 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, N. B., Ericson, K. I., Esses, V. M., & Isaacs, B. J. (1994). The developmentally handicapped witness: Competency as a function of question format. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 171–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podell, D. M., Kastner, J., & Kastner, S. (1994). Mental retardation and adult women's perceptions of adolescent sexual abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 18, 808–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podell, D. M., Kastner, J., & Kastner, S. (1996). Adolescents with mental retardation: Perceptions of sexual abuse. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 66, 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quas, J. A., Bottoms, B. L., Haegerich, T. M., & Nysse-Carris, K. L. (in press). Effects of victim, defendant, and juror gender on decisions in child sexual assault cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

  • Ross, D. F., Miller, B. S., & Moran, P. B. (1987). The child in the eyes of the jury: Assessing mock jurors' perceptions of the child witness. In S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross (Eds.), Children's eyewitness memory (pp. 142–154). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, C. W., & Brigham, J. C. (1996). Jurors' perceptions of child victim-witnesses in a simulated sexual abuse trial. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 581–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutte, J. W., & Hosch, H. M. (1997). Gender differences in sexual assault verdicts: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 759–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scotti, J. R., Slack, B. S., Bowman, R. A., & Morris, T. L. (1996). College student attitudes concerning the sexuality of persons with mental retardation: Development of the perceptions of sexuality scale. Sexuality and Disability, 14, 249–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, R. R. (2000). The memory of female witnesses with mild mental retardation: Implications for reports of sexual abuse. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobsey, D. (1994). Violence and abuse in the lives of people with disabilities: The end of silent acceptance? Baltimore: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobsey, D. (1997). Equal protection of the law for crime victims with developmental disabilities. Impact, 10(2), 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobsey, D., & Doe, T. (1991). Patterns of sexual abuse and assault. Sexuality and Disability, 9(3), 243–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J. K., Borgida, E., & McCoy, K. (1993). Videotaped versus in-court witness testimony: Does protecting the child witness jeopardize due process? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 603–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmers, R. L., Ducharme, P., & Jacob, G. (1981). Sexual knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of developmentally disabled adults living in a normalized apartment setting. Sexuality and Disability, 4, 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenti-Hein, D., & Schwartz, L. D. (1993). Witness competency in people with mental retardation: Implications for prosecution of sexual abuse. Sexuality and Disability, 11(4), 287–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdugo, M. A., Bermejo, B. G., & Fuertes, J. (1995). The maltreatment of intellectually handicapped children and adolescents. Child Abuse and Neglect, 19, 205–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, C. K., & Foss-Goodman, D. (1984). Child molesting: Variables relating to attribution of fault to victims, offenders, and nonparticipating parents. Journal of Sex Research, 20, 329–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisz, J. R. (1981). Effects of the “mentally retarded” label on adult judgments about child failure. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 371–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westcott, H. L., & Jones, D. P. H. (1999). Annotation: The abuse of disabled children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 40, 497–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. (1995). Invisible victims: Crime and abuse against people with learning disabilities. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. F. (1986). Perceptions of mentally retarded persons. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 21, 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarmey, A. D., & Jones, H. P. T. (1983). Is the psychology of eyewitness identification a matter of common sense? In S. M. A. Lloyd-Bostock & B. R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating eyewitness evidence (pp. 13–40). Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellman, G. L. (1992). The impact of case characteristics on child abuse reporting decisions. Child Abuse and Neglect, 16, 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology (m/c 285), The University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

    Bette L. Bottoms

  2. National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

    Kari L. Nysse-Carris

  3. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

    Twana Harris

  4. River Oak Center for Children, Sacramento, California

    Kimberly Tyda

Authors
  1. Bette L. Bottoms
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kari L. Nysse-Carris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Twana Harris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kimberly Tyda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Bottoms, B.L., Nysse-Carris, K.L., Harris, T. et al. Jurors' Perceptions of Adolescent Sexual Assault Victims Who Have Intellectual Disabilities. Law Hum Behav 27, 205–227 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022551314668

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022551314668

Search

Navigation