Law and Human Behavior

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 141–156 | Cite as

Taking Responsibility for an Act Not Committed: The Influence of Age and Suggestibility

  • Allison D. Redlich
  • Gail S. Goodman


Inherent in false confessions is a person taking responsibility for an act he or she did not commit. The risk of taking such responsibility may be elevated in juveniles. To study possible factors that influence individuals' likelihood for taking responsibility for something they did not do, participants in a laboratory experiment were led to believe they crashed a computer when in fact they had not. Participants from 3 age groups were tested: 12- and 13-year-olds, 15- and 16-year-olds, and young adults. Half of the participants in each age group were presented with false evidence indicating liability. Additionally, suggestibility was investigated as a potential individual-difference factor affecting vulnerability to admissions of guilt. Results showed that younger and more suggestible participants were more likely than older and less suggestible participants to falsely take responsibility. Implications of these findings for juvenile justice are discussed.

confessions juveniles suggestibility 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Cialdini, R. B. (1993). Influence: Science and practice. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  2. Clare, I. C. H., Gudjonsson, G. H., Rutter, S. C., & Cross, P. (1994). The interrater reliability of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 357–365.Google Scholar
  3. Frazier v. Cupp, 394 U.S. 731 (1969).Google Scholar
  4. Grisso, T., & Schwartz, R. G. (2000). Youth on trial: Developmental perspective on juvenile justice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1984). A new scale of interrogative suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 303–314.Google Scholar
  6. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1990). One hundred alleged false confession cases: Some normative data. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29, 249–250.Google Scholar
  7. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1991). The effects of intelligence and memory on group differences in suggestibility and compliance. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 503–505.Google Scholar
  8. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1992). The psychology of interrogations, confessions, and testimony. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1993). Confession evidence, psychological vulnerability, and expert testimony. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 3, 117–129.Google Scholar
  10. Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. C. (2001). Criminal interrogation and confessions (4th ed.). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.Google Scholar
  11. Kassin, S. M. (1997). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52, 221–233.Google Scholar
  12. Kassin, S. M. (Chair). (2002). Actual innocence: Antecedents and consequences of wrongful convictions. Symposium presented at the American Psychology Law Society conference, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
  13. Kassin, S. M., & Kiechel, K. L. (1996). The social psychology of false confessions: Compliance, internalization, and confabulation. Psychological Science, 7, 125–128.Google Scholar
  14. Kassin, S. M., & Sukel, H. (1997). Coerced confessions and the jury: An experimental test of the “Harmless Error” rule. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 27–46.Google Scholar
  15. Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1980). Prior confessions and mock juror verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 133–146.Google Scholar
  16. Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1981). Coerced confessions, judicial instruction, and mock juror verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 489–506.Google Scholar
  17. Leo, R. A., & Ofshe, R. J. (1998). The consequences of false confessions: Deprivations of liberty and miscarriages of justice in the age of psychological interrogation. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 429–496.Google Scholar
  18. McMahon, M. (1995). False confessions and police deception: The interrogation, incarceration, and release of an innocent veteran. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 13, 5–43.Google Scholar
  19. Meyer, R. G., & Youngjohn, J. R. (1991). Effects of feedback and validity expectancy on responses in a lie detector interview. Forensic Reports, 4, 235–244.Google Scholar
  20. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  21. Ofshe, R. J. (1989). Coerced confessions: The logic of seemingly irrational action. Cultic Studies Journal, 6, 1–15.Google Scholar
  22. Ofshe, R. J. (1992). Inadvertent hypnosis during interrogation: False confessions due to dissociative state; mis-identified multiple personality and the satanic cult hypothesis. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, XL, 125–156.Google Scholar
  23. Olio, K. A., & Cornell, W. F. (1998). The facade of scientific documentation: A case study of Richard Ofshe's analysis of the Paul Ingram case. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 4, 1182–1197.Google Scholar
  24. Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1932)Google Scholar
  25. Richardson, G., Gudjonsson, G. H., & Kelly, T. P. (1995). Interrogative suggestibility in an adolescent forensic population. Journal of Adolescence, 18, 211–216.Google Scholar
  26. Scherer, D. G. (1991). The capacities of minors to exercise voluntariness in medical treatment decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 431–449.Google Scholar
  27. Scherer, D. G., & Reppucci, N. D. (1988). Adolescents' capacities to provide voluntary informed consent: The effects of parental influence and medical dilemmas. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 123–141.Google Scholar
  28. Sigurdsson, J. F., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1996). The psychological characteristics of “false confessors.” A study among Icelandic prison inmates and juvenile offenders. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 321–329.Google Scholar
  29. Singh, K. K., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1992). Interrogative suggestibility among adolescent boys and its relationship with intelligence, memory, and cognitive set. Journal of Adolescence, 15, 155–161.Google Scholar
  30. Smith, P., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1995). Confabulation among forensic inpatients and its relationship with memory, suggestibility, compliance, anxiety, and self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 517–523.Google Scholar
  31. Walker, N. E., Brooks, C. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1999). On guilt and Gault. In N. E. Walker, C. M. Brooks, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Children's rights in the United States: In search of a national policy (pp. 193–215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Warren, A., Hulse-Trotter, K., & Tubbs, E. (1991). Inducing resistance to suggestibility in children. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 273–285.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychology Association 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allison D. Redlich
    • 1
  • Gail S. Goodman
    • 2
  1. 1.Policy Research Associates Inc.Delmar
  2. 2.University of CaliforniaDavis

Personalised recommendations