Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison Between Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy and Time-Resolved Fluorescence Anisotropy as Illustrated with a Fluorescent Dextran Conjugate

  • Published:
Journal of Fluorescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The motional properties of rhodamine green alone and conjugated to 10-kDa dextran have been studied by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) and time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy (TRFA). With FCS the translational diffusion times of the fluorescent particles can be determined, which are directly proportional to the shear viscosity as shown in aqueous solutions of different sucrose concentrations. With TRFA the rotational correlation times of the fluorescent particles can be determined. TRFA experiments in the case of fluorescent dextran reveal a distinct restricted internal motion of the fluorescent probe independent of the slower overall rotation of the polysaccharide. The fast depolarization is most likely due to internal motion and not to energy transfer between different rhodamine green molecules in the same dextran, since a higher viscosity of the solvent increases the correlation time for internal motion proportionally. FCS and TRFA yield complementary information in the sense that the correlation time for overall dextran rotation can be accurately determined from the translational diffusion coefficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. M. Eigen and R. Rigler (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 5740–5747.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Maiti, U. Haupts, and W. W. Webb (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 11753–11757.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. R. P. Haugland (1996) Handbook of Fluorescent Pobes and Research Chemicals, 6th ed., Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, pp. 351–357.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. I. H. Bastiaens, A. van Hoek, W. F. Wolkers, J. C. Brochon, and A. J. W. G. Visser (1992) Biochemistry 31, 7050–7060.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. P. A. W. van den Berg, A. van Hoek, C. D. Walentas, R. N. Perham, and A. J. W. G. Visser (1998) Biophys. J. 74, 2046–2058.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 56th ed. (1975) CRC Press, Cleveland, p. D-261.

  7. R. E. Dale, J. Eisinger, and W. E. Blumberg (1979) Biophys. J. 26, 161–194.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Szabo (1984) J. Chem. Phys. 81, 150–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Visser, N.V., Hink, M.A., van Hoek, A. et al. Comparison Between Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy and Time-Resolved Fluorescence Anisotropy as Illustrated with a Fluorescent Dextran Conjugate. Journal of Fluorescence 9, 251–255 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022515902867

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022515902867

Navigation