Skip to main content

A Note on the Correspondence Between Complexity and Systems Theory

Abstract

Complexity theory shares a common vocabulary with systems theory. Terms such as emergence, complexity, and adaptation appear in both traditions. Despite the similarities, complexity theory is not a misnomer for systems theory. Several points of departure exist in complexity's research agenda and methods. Moreover, while systems theory appears to have embraced interpretivist and critical philosophies, complexity theory remains firmly in the positivist camp, despite claims that it is a postmodern science.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  1. Brocklesby, J., and Cummings, S. (1996). Foucault plays Habermas: An alternative philosophical underpinning for critical systems thinking. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 47 741–754

    Google Scholar 

  2. Checkland, P. (1995). Model validation in soft systems practice. Syst. Res. 12 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Checkland, P. B. (1972). Towards a systems-based methodology for real-world problem-solving. J. Syst. Eng. 3 87–116.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Checkland, P. B. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen, K. J., and Cyert, R. M. (1961). Computer models in dynamic economics. Q. J. Econ. 75 112–127.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Drogoul, A., and Ferber, J. (1994). Multi-agent simulation as a tool for studying emergent processes in societies. In Gilbert N., and Doran, J. (eds.), Simulating Societies: The Computer Simulation of Social Phenomena UCL Press, London, pp. 127–142.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Flood, R. L. (1990). Liberating systems theory: Toward critical systems thinking. Hum. Relat. 43 49–75.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Flood, R. L., and Carson, E. R. (1988). Dealing with Complexity: An Introduction to the Theory and Application of Systems Science Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Garfinkel, A., Spano, M. L., Ditto, W. L., and Weiss, J. (1992). Issues in controlling cardiac chaos. Science 257 1230.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning Addison-Wesley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gross, P. R., and Levitt, N. (1994). Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Holland, J. H., and Miller, J. H. (1991). Artificial adaptive agents in economic theory. Am. Econ. Rev. 81 365–370.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., and Thagard, P. R. (1986). Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning and Discovery MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lakatos, I., and Musgrave, A. (eds.) (1970). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lorenz, E. (1963). Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 20 130–141.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lyotard, J.-F. (1983). Answering the question: What is postmodernism? In Hassan, H., and Hassan, S. (eds.), Innovation/Renovation University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp. 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  17. McKelvey, B. (1997). Quasi-natural organization science. Org. Sci. 8 351–380.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mikulecky, D. C. (1998). A close look at a new science: Chaos as science or science in chaos, Working Paper, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond. [Available: http://views.vcu.edu/~mikuleck/chaos2.htm (Dec. 4, 1998).]

    Google Scholar 

  19. Morecroft, J. D. W. (1985). Rationality in the analysis of behavioral simulation models. Manage. Sci. 31 900–916.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Newell, A., and Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Phelan, S. E. (1995). From chaos to complexity in strategic planning. Paper presented at the 55th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Vancouver.

  22. Phelan, S. E. (1997). Using Artificial Adaptive Agents to Explore Strategic Landscapes Ph.D. dissertation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Price, B. (1997). The myth of postmodern science. In Eve, R. A., Horsfall, S., and Lee, M. E. (eds.), Chaos, Complexity and Sociology: Myths, Models, and Theories Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rocha, L. M. (1997). Evidence Sets and Contextual Genetic Algorithms: Exploring Uncertainty, Context, and Embodiment in Cognitive and Biological Systems Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York.

  25. Sokal, A. D., and Bricmont, J. (1998). Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science St. Martin's Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stacey, R. D. (1991). The Chaos Frontier: Creative Strategic Control for Business Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tsoukas, H. (1992). Panoptic reason and the search for totality: A critical assessment of the critical systems perspective. Hum. Relat. 45 637–657.

    Google Scholar 

  28. von Foerster, H. (1984). On constructing a reality. In von Foerster, H. (ed.), Observing Systems Intersystems, Seaside, CA, pp. 288–309.

    Google Scholar 

  29. von Glasersfeld, E. (1991). Knowing without metaphysics: Aspects of the radical constructivist position. In Steier, F. (ed.), Research and Reflexivity Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Vriend, N. J. (1994). Self-organized markets in a decentralized economy, Working Paper 94-03-013, Sante Fe Institute, Sante Fe, NM.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos Penguin Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yates, F. E. (1978). Complexity and the limits to knowledge. Am. J. Physio. 4 201–204.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zwick, M. (1997). Complexity theory and systems theory. Paper presented at the International Institute for General Systems Studies, Second Workshop, San Marcos, TX.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Phelan, S.E. A Note on the Correspondence Between Complexity and Systems Theory. Systemic Practice and Action Research 12, 237–246 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022495500485

Download citation

  • chaos
  • complexity
  • systems theory
  • positivism
  • realism