Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of the 1999 East Marmara Earthquake in Turkey

  • Published:
Population and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies responses to the 1999 Marmara Earthquake (Turkey) in which 18,000 people died, 50,000 people were injured, there were 5,000 building collapses and 340,000 damaged buildings, 14,513 businesses closed, 150,000 people became unemployed, and 129,338 were forced to live in prefabricated houses. This research is based on a survey comprising 500 interviews carried out a year after the earthquake. Responsible behavior as the dependent variable is statistically tested with several socio-demographic and attitude variables. The findings indicate social solidarity, knowledge, basic needs, desire for change and psychological status of the disaster survivors were all adversely affected. It was observed that education, employment, social security, knowledge and fatalism have varying impacts on responsible behavior related to preparedness for future earthquakes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ak?it, B. & Karanc?, A.N. (1999a). Social and Psychological Lessons Learned from Dinar Earthquake and Mitigation Activities in Bursa. In E. M. Komut (Ed.), Urban Settlement and Natural Disasters, Proceedings of UIA Region II Workprogramme Workshop, Proceedings of UIA Region II Workshop Chamber of Architects of Turkey, Ankara, 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ak?it, B. & Karanc?, A.N. (1999b). Strengthening Community Participation in Disaster Management and Non-Governmental Organizations Networks: A Case Study from Dinar and Bursa (Turkey). The Australian Journal of Emergency Management 13 (4), 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, D.E. (2000). Confronting Catastrophe: New Perspectives on Natural Disasters. New York: Terra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, W.A. (1969). Disaster Warning and Communication Processes in Two Communities. Journal of Communication 19 (2), 92–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, A. (1969). Communities in Disaster: A Sociological Analysis of Collective Stress Situations. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, F. L. & Peacock, W. (1987). Disasters and Social Change. In R. Dynes, B. De Marchi & C. Pelanda, W. (Eds.), Sociology of Disasters. Milan: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, R.C. (1994). Post Disaster Sheltering and Housing: Social Processes in Response and Recovery. In R.R. Dynes & K.J. Tierney (Eds.), Disasters, Collective Behavior and Social Organisation. Newark: University of Delaware.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, I. (1981). Disasters and the Small Dwelling. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynes, R.R. (1970). Organised Behavior in Disaster. Massachusetts: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, K. (1976). Everything in its Path. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. New York: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrity, E.T. & Steinglass, P. (1994). Relocation Stress Following Natural Disasters. In R. J. Ursano, B. G. McCaughey & C. S. Fullerton (Eds.), Individual and Community Responses to Trauma and Disaster. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, J.M., Hungerford, H.R. & Tomera, A.N. (1986/7). Analysis and Synthesis of Research on Responsible Environmental Behavior: A Meta Analysis. Journal of Environmental Education 18 (2), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanc?, A. N. & Ak?it, B. (1999) Strengthening Community Participation in Disaster Management by Strengthening Governmental and Non-governmental Organisations and Networks: A Case Study from Dinar and Bursa (Turkey). The Australian Journal of Emergency Management 13 (4), 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanc?, A.N., Alkan, N., Ak?it, B. & Balta, F. (1999). Gender Differences in Psychological Distress, Coping, Social Support and Related Variables Following the Dinar (Turkey) Earthquake. North American Journal of Psychology 1 (2), 189–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasapo?lu, M.A. & Ecevit, M.C. (2002). Attitudes and Behavior Towards the Environment: A Case of Lake Burdur in Turkey. Environment and Behavior, 34 (3), 363–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menard, Scott (1995). Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, P. (1971). Shelter in Africa. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver-Smith, A. (1986). The Martyred City. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli, E.L. (1998). What is a Disaster? Perspectives on the Question. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, A. F. C. (1956). Tornado in Worcester. National Research Council Disaster Study No 3, Washington D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aytül Kasapoğlu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kasapoğlu, A., Ecevit, M. Impact of the 1999 East Marmara Earthquake in Turkey. Population and Environment 24, 339–358 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022453722574

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022453722574

Navigation