Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Progress in Practice: UKCPA Residential Symposium, Hilton Hotel, Blackpool, UK. Friday, 22-Sunday, 24 November 2002

  • Published:
Pharmacy World and Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. McGinnity S, Rock L, Bolas H. Counselling patients on discharge. Hospital Pharmacist 1999; 6(9): 224–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tranter B. Prevent problems after discharge. Pharmacy in Practice 1997; 7(10): 544–52.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown E. Improve the discharge process. Pharmacy in Practice 1999; 9: 322–5.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Campbell S M, Cantrill J A, and Roberts D. prescribing indicators for UK general practice: Delphi consultation study. BMJ 321: 1–5, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A First Class Service. Quality in the new NHS. NHS White Paper. NHS Executive Publication. 1998.

  3. Pharmacy in the future – implementing the NHS plan. Department of Health. September 2000.

  4. Shifting the balance of power within the NHS. Department of Health. July 2001.

  5. Freeman AC, Sweeney K. Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study. BMJ 323: 1–5, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rycroft-Malone J. Formal consensus: the development of a national clinical guideline. Quality in Health Care 10:238–244 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jackson C, Veitch B. Specialist faculties-the pragmatic rout to supporting professional competence. The Pharmaceutical Journal 266: 821–823, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Watson M and Sharp D. General Practitioners' opinion of educational outreach visits from community pharmacists as a method of providing prescribing information. The Pharmaceutical Journal 266: 20–22, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Watson M, Gunnell D, Peters T, Brookes S, and Sharp D. Guidelines and educational outreach visits from community pharmacists to improve prescribing in general practice: a randomised controlled trial.J Health Serv Res Policy 6(4): 207–213, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Department of Health. An Organisation with a Memory. London. August 2000.

  2. Department of Health. Building a Safer NHS for Patients. London. April 2001.

  3. Flynn E, Barker K, Pepper G, Bates D, Mikeal R. Comparison of methods for detecting medication errors in 36 hospitals and skilled nursing facilities. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 2002; 59: 437–46.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scheme for anonymous reporting of medication errors. Pharm J 1993; 251: 796.d

References

  1. Domiciliary oxygen therapy services: clinical guidelines and advice for prescribers. Summary of a report of the Royal College of Physicians. J R Coll Physicians Lond 1999; 33: 445–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Medicines, Ethics and Practice. A guide for pharmacists (25) July 2001.

References

  1. Haemostasis and Thrombosis Task Force. Guidelines on anticoagulation: Third Edition. British Journal of Haematology 1998; 101: 374–87.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Poller et al. Multicentre randomised study of computerised antcoagulant dosage. The Lancet 1998; 352: 1505–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stewart S. Biannual analysis report. Dawn-AC Benchmarking, 2001.

  4. Ageno W. A randomised comparison of a computer-based dosing program with a manual system to monitor oral anticoagulant therapy. Thrombosis research 1998; 92: 237–40.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. SIGN Guideline Number 34: Management of sore throat and indications for tonsillectomy. January 1999.

  2. Campbell A, McGovern EM, Millar H, Bryson SM. SIGN Guidelines and the management of sore throat in community pharmacy. Int J Pharm Pract 2001; 9(suppl): R15.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The sale and supply of oral liquid medicines. Glasgow Pharmacy Audit Programme. May 2002.

References

  1. Clinical Resource and Audit Group. Clinical Outcome Indicators Working Group. December 2000.

  2. Leung-Wing C, Conrad KW. Risk factors for early hospital readmission in elderly medical patients. Gerontology 1999; 45: 2202–26.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Krska J, Cromarty JA, Arris F. Pharmacist-led mediation review in patients over 65: A randomised controlled trial in primary care. Age and Aging 2001; 30: 205–21.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clinical Resource and Audit Group. Pharmaceutical care in the hospital pharmaceutical service: a framework for practice. December 1994.

References

  1. Briegel J, et al. Stress doses of hydrocortisone reverse hyperdynamic septic shock: a prospective, randomised, double blind, single-centre study. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 723–32.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bollaert PE et al. Reversal of late septic shock with supraphysiologic doses of hydrocortisone. Crit Care Med 1998; 26: 645–50.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Members of the American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference Committee: Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med 1992; 20: 864–74.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Bates DW. Medication errors. How common are they and what can be done to prevent them? Drug Safety 1996; 15: 303–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anon. Benefits of recording interventions. Pharm J 2001; 267: 188.

  3. Cerulli J. Medication errors. The role of the community pharmacists in identifying, preventing, and resolving drug-related problems. http:/www.medscape.com/Medscape/pharmacists/journal/2001/ v02.n04/mph7645.ceru-01.html.

  4. Rupp MT, DeYoung M, Schondelmeyer SW. Prescribing problems and pharmacist interventions in community practice. Med Care 1992; 30: 926–40.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anon. Boots tackles causes of dispensing errors. Pharm J 2001; 267: 451.

  6. Anon. Pharmacists can help prevent and minimize medication errors. Pharm J 2001; 267: 363.

  7. Cavell GF, Oborne A. Anonymously reported medication errors: the tip of the iceberg. Int J Pharm Pract 2001; 9(suppl): R52.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Department of Health Report. An organisation with a memory. HMSO, London, June 2000.

  9. Oborne CA, Burgess B, Cavell GF et. al. Anonymous reporting of drug-related errors: application of a modified secondary care model in a community pharmacy setting. Pharm J 2002; 268: 101–3.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pruce D. Ready-to-go series. Dispensing errors-Dispensing process Topic audit risk management. RPSGB 2000

References

  1. National Osteoporosis Society. Primary care strategy for falls and osteoporosis. A framework for health improvement programmes implementing the National Service Framework for Older People. NOS; Bath. July 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shirley A B, Scott E M. Knowledge of osteoporosis and its prevention among women aged 40–60 years. Pharm J 1999;263: R42.

    Google Scholar 

  3. McClure L, Moody M. An investigation into the information needs of women in relation to menopausal symptoms, their treatment and prevention. Pharm J 1998;261: R26.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Royal College of Physicians (1999) Osteoporosis: clinical guidelines for prevention and treatment, RCP, London National Osteoporosis Society, Press Release May 1999.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. A trial fibrillation investigators. Risk factors for stroke and efficacy of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation: analysis of pooled data from five randomised controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 1449–57.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sudlow M, Thomson R, Thwaites B, et al. Prevalence of atrial fibrillation and eligibility for anticoagulants in the community. Lancet 1998; 352:1167–71.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fennerty A, Dolben J, Thomas P, et al. Flexible dose regimen for warfarin and prediction of maintenance dose. Br Med J 1984;288:1268–70.

    Google Scholar 

  4. van der Meer FJM, Rosendaal FR, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. Bleeding complications in oral anticoagulant therapy. 1993; 153:1557–62.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wynne HA, Kamali F, Edwards C, et al. Effect of ageing upon warfarin dose requirements: A longitudinal study. Age and Ageing 1996; 25:429–31.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Horne R, Hankins M, Jenkins R. The Satisfaction with Information about Medicines Scale (SIMS): a new measurement tool for audit and research. Qual Health Care 2001; 10: 135–40.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Horne R, Weinman J, Hankins M. The Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ): the development and evaluation of a new method for assessing cognitive representation of medication. Psychol Health 1999; 14: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. McNitt, J, Eugene T, Nelson R. Long-term pharmaceutical cost reduction using a data management system. Anesth Analga 1998;87:837–42.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yong C, C.P, Hylands J. Audit of ephedrine, suxamethonium and atropine ampoule usage in theatres. Pharm W Sci 1998;22(5–6):(207)B17.

  3. Webster CS, Merry AF, Ducat CM. Safety, cost and predrawn emergency drugs. Anaesthesia 2001;56(8):818–20.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Nunney JM, Raynor DK. Multicompartment compliance aids in primary care: building an evidence base. Pharm J 1999; 263: R34-R35.

    Google Scholar 

  2. MacDonald R. Elderly people face extra prescription charge. BMJ 2002; 324:68.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. The NHS Plan – a plan for investment, a plan for reform. London: Department of Health; July 2000.

  2. Tweedie A and Jones I. What is medicines management? Pharm J 2001: 266; 248.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Patton MQ. (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd Ed. SAGE Publications, Inc. London.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Miles MB and Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd Ed. SAGE Publications, Inc. London, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A spoonful of sugar-medicines management in NHS hospitals. Audit Commission. December 2001.

References

  1. Department of Health. Pharmacy in the Future-Implementing the NHS Plan. London, Stationery Office 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Department of Health. Medicines and Older People National Service Framework: Implementing medicines related aspects of the NSF for older people. London, Stationery Office 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Duggan C, Bates I, Hough J, et al. Reducing unintentional discrepancies in prescribing. Int J Pharm Pract 1998; 6:77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Binyon D. Pharmaceutical care: its impact on patient care and hospital-community interface. Pharm J 1994;253:344–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pegrum C. Seamless care: the need for communication between hospital and community pharmacists. Pharm J 1995;254:72–3.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brookes K, Scott M and McConnell J. The benefits of a hospital based community services liaison pharmacist. Pharm Wold and Sci 2000;22:33–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nazareth I, Burton A, Sculman S et al. A pharmacy discharge plan for hospitalised elderly patients – a randomised controlled trial. Age and Ageing 2001;30(1):33–40.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. McWhirter, J.P, Pennington, C.R. Incidence and recognition of malnutrition in hospital.. BMJ 1994; 308: 945–8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Murphy P. Enteral feeds explained. Pharm J 2001; 267: 297–300.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sip feed prescribing in primary care: an audit of current practice in Greater Glasgow Health Board, Glasgow, UK. McCombie, L. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 1999; 12(3): 201–12.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Personal correspondence with dietician, community dietetics department, St. Mary's Hospital, Leeds.

References

  1. Audit Commission. A spoonful of sugar. Medicines management in NHS hospitals. 2001.

  2. Ellis RF, Stephens MA, Sharp GB. Evaluation of a pharmacy managed warfarin monitoring service to co-ordinate inpatient and outpatient therapy. Am J Hosp Pharm 1992; 49: 387–94.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tan G, Cohen H, Taylor F, Gabby J. Audit of start of anticoagulation treatment in inpatients. J Clin Pathol 1993; 46: 67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sowter J, Feely M, Kay E. An audit of warfarin anticoagulation in teaching hospital patients. Pharm J 1997; 259: 612–3.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brice S. A comparative evaluation of doctor and pharmacist managed inpatient anticoagulation. Pharm Pract 2001; 134–7.

  6. Haemostasis and Thrombosis Task Force. Guidelines on oral anticoagulation: 3rd Edition. J Clin Pathol 1989; 43: 177–83.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Scott DA, Clegg A, Sidhu M, Hewiston P, Waugh N. Clinical and Cost effectiveness of Pacitaxel, Docetaxel, Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine in Lung Cancer. NICE Guidance 2001.

  2. Gregor A, Milroy R. An aid to planning cancer services in Scotland in the next decade, Cancer Scenarios; 2001. Number 4

  3. Clinical Oncology Information Network. Guidelines on the nonsurgical Management of Lung cancer. The Royal College of Radiologists' Clinical Oncology Information Network; 1999.

  4. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. NICE issues guidance on Drugs for Lung Cancer; 2001.

References

  1. All Party Parliamentary Group on Skin. An investigation into the adequacy of service provision and treatments for patients with skin diseases in the UK. London; March 1997.

References

  1. United Kingdom Renal Registry.

  2. Salvetti A et al. What effect does control of high blood pressure have on the progression toward renal failure? Am J Kidney Dis 1993:21 (suppl 3);10.

    Google Scholar 

  3. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type II diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ 1998; 317:703–13.

    Google Scholar 

  4. McGavock H. Non-compliant patients: causes and solutions. Prescriber 1998; 117–20.

  5. Titcomb LC. The pharmacist's role in drug history taking. British Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice 1989;186–95.

References

  1. West Glasgow Hospitals University NHS Trust, Vancomycin dosing guidelines.

  2. Reeves VJ. An audit of vancomycin dosing in adults. Final year project, Pharmacy department, University of Brighton, 2001.

  3. Benkert SC, Sinnett MJ, Amodio-Groton M. Impact of monitoring vancomycin peak and trough concentrations versus trough concentration alone on dose adjustments: an outcomes analysis. J Pharm Technol 2000; 16: 236–40.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. McArtney, B. Dispensing errors: Future management (report of meeting). Journal of the Guild of Healthcare Pharmacists 2002; 2: 24–6.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. ASPIRE Steering Group. The British Cardiac Society survey of the potential for the secondary prevention of Corinne disease: ASPIRE (Action on secondary prevention throughout intervention to reduce events) Heart 1996; 75P: 334–2.

    Google Scholar 

  2. EUROASPIRE I and II Group: European Action on Secondary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events. Clinical reality of coronary prevention guidelines: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I and II in nine countries. European Action on Secondary Prevention by Intervention to reduce Events Lancet 2001; 357: 995–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Service Framework for Coronary Heart disease. Department of Health 2001.

References

  1. Jackson C, Rowe P, Lea R. Pharmacy discharge-a professional necessity for the 1990s Pharm J 1993; 250: 58–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Duggan C, et al. Reducing adverse prescribing discrepancies following hospital discharge. Int J Pharm Pract 1998; 6: 140–4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Department of Health. Pharmacy in the Future – Implementing the NHS Plan. London, The Stationary Office 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Department of Health. Medicines for Older People: Implementing medicines-related aspects of the NSF for Older People. London, The Stationary Office 2001.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Scroccaro G, Alminana MA, Floor-Schreudering A et al. The need for clinical pharmacy. Pharm World Sci 2000; 22(1): 27–9

    Google Scholar 

  2. Compliance or concordance: is there a difference? DTP 1999; 13(1): 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lack of information is the cause of non-compliance. Pharm J 1997; 259: 860.

  4. McGinnity S, Rock L, Bolas H. Counselling patients on discharge. Hosp Pharmacist 1999; 6: 224–6.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Department of Health. 2000. An organisation with a memory. Report of an expert group on learning from adverse events in the NHS. London: The Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Department of Health. 2001. Building a safer NHS for patients URL:http://www.doh.gov.uk/buildsafenhs [Accessed 20 April 2001].

  3. Cousins DH, Upton DR. Medication Errors: Make infusion pumps safer to use. Pharmacy in Practice 1995;5:401–5.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. MacCara M.E. Extravasation: a hazard of intravenous therapy. Drug Intell Clin Pharm 1983; 17: 713–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allwood M, Stanley A, Wright, P. The Cytotoxics Handbook, 3rd edition, Radcliffe Medical Press: Oxon, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bertelli G. Prevention and management of cytotoxic drugs. Drug Safety 1995; 12 (4): 245–5.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Cotter SM et al (1994). Survey of clinical pharmacy services in United Kingdom National Health Service hospitals. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy 51: 2676–2684.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Batty R and Barber N (1992). Ward pharmacy: a foundation for prescribing audit? Quality in Health Care 1:5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Leape LL et al (1999). Pharmacist participation on physician drug rounds and adverse drug events in the Intensive Care Unit. JAMA282: 267–270.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cousins DH and Luscombe DK (1996). A new model for hospital pharmacy practice. Pharmaceutical Journal 256: 347–51.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Leech D (2000). Patient-directed pharmacy services: do they benefit patients? Hospital Pharmacist 7: 263–4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McRobbie D et al (2001). Impact of reorganisation of pharmacy services to general medical wards at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust. Abstract presented at the Pan Thames Pharmacy Symposium, London 20 July.

  7. Sagripanti M et al (2002). An evaluation of the medication-related risks for elective surgery patients: from pre-operative assessment to discharge International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (accepted for publication).

  8. Jacklin A et al (2001). A discharge pharmacist service improves the timeliness, quality and cost of discharge. Pharmacy in Practice 11: 100–1002.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Tweedie A, Jones I. What is Medicines Management? PharmJ 2001; 266:248.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Audit Commission. A spoonful of sugar-Medicines Management in NHS Hospitals. Audit Commission for local authorities and the NHS in England and Wales 2001.

References

  1. McCaffery M, Pasero C. Pain: Clinical Manual 2nd ed. Mosby: London; 1999

    Google Scholar 

  2. British National Formulary No. 43 British Medical Association (BMJ Books), The Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain (Pharmaceutical Press): London; 2002

  3. Schug SA, Sidebotham DA, McGuinnety M et al. Acetaminophen as an adjunct to morphine by patient-controlled analgesia in the management of acute postoperative pain. Anesth Analg 1998; 87: 368–72

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cobby TF, Crighton IM, Kyriakides K et al. Rectal paracetamol has a significant morphine-sparing effect after hysterectomy. Br J of Anaesth 1999; 83 (2): 253–6

    Google Scholar 

  5. Korpela R, Korvenoja P, Meretoja OA et al. Morphine-sparing effect of acetaminophen in pediatric day-case surgery. Anaesthesiology 1999; 91 (2): 442–7

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sandrini M, Romualdi P, Vitale G et al. The effect of a paracetamol and morphine combination on dynorphin A levels in the rat brain. Biochem Pharmacol 2001; 61 (11): 1409–16

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Anonymous. Sterility of eye-drops. Lancet 1969; 2(7635): 1408–9.

  2. Ayliffe GA, Barry DR, Lowbury EJ et al. Postoperative infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an eye hospital. Lancet 1966; 1(7447): 1113–7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Crompton DO. Medical ethics and hospital-acquired disease. Lancet 1978; 2(8081):146.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Livingstone DJ, Hanlon GW, Dyke S. Evaluation of an extended period of use for preserved eye drops in hospital practice. Br J Ophthalmol 1998; 82: 473–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anonymous. New guidance on use of eye preparations. Pharm J 2001; 267: 307.

References

  1. Technology Appraisal Guidance – No.27. Guidance on the use of cyclo-oxygenase (cox) II selective inhibitors, celecoxib, rofecoxib, meloxicam and etodolac for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. National Institute of Clinical Evidence. July 2001.

  2. Silverstein FE, Faich G, Goldstein JL, Simon LS et al. The CLASS study. Gastrointestinal Toxicity with celecoxib vs nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. JAMA. 2000; Vol 284(10): 1247–55.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bombardier C, Laine L, Reicin A, et al. the VIGOR study. Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 1520–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Therapeutics Initiative, letter 39. Evidence Based Drug Therapy. Selective COX-2 inhibitors: Are they safer NSAIDs? 2001.

  5. Drugs and therapeutics bulletin 2000. Are rofecoxib and celecoxib safer NSAIDs?. Vol 38. No 11.

  6. Karim Z, Emery P. CLASS and VIGOR: coxibs versus conventional NSAIDs in arthritis. Future Prescriber. Sept/Oct 2000; 22–4.

  7. Gotzsche PC. Clinical Review: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. BMJ 2000; 320: 1058–61.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wolfe MM, Lichtenstein DR, Singh G. Gastrointestinal toxicity of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. New Engl J Med. 1999; 349(24): 1888–99.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feldman M, Alexander T, McMahon M. do cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors provide benefits similar to those of traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, with less gastrointestinal toxicity. Ann Intern Med. 2000; 132(2): 134–43.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Webb D et al. Concordance: last link in the chain? Pharm J 1999; 263: 782.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Silcock J. Personal correspondence, 2001. Leeds Teaching Hospitals.

  3. Kelly MH, Murray TS. General Practitioners Views on continuing medical education. British Journal of General Practice 1994; 44: 469–71.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pope C, Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. British Medical Journal 1995; 311: 43–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bogden R, Bilken S. Qualitative Research for Education. An Introduction to Theory and Methods, Pp. 153–181. New York: Allyn and Bacon, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cartwright A. The experience of patients and general practitioners. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 1994; 87 (Supplement 23): 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eagleton JM, Walker FS, Barber N D. An investigation into patient compliance with hospital discharge medication in a local population. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice July 1993; 107–9.

References

  1. Barbut F, Petit JC. Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile associated infections. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2001; 7: 405–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Settle CD. Clostridium difficile. British Journal of Hospital Medicine 1996; 56: 398–400.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Eidan FA. Clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea in hospitalised patients. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics 2000; 2: 101–9.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Department of Health. An organization with a memory. London: The Department; June 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Department of Health. Building a safer NHS for patients. London: the Department; April 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barker KN, Pearson RE, Hepler CD et al. Effect of an automated bedside dispensing machine on medication errors. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1984; 41: 1352–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M. Adverse events in British hospitals: Preliminary retrospective record review. BMJ. 2001; 322: 517–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Allan EL, Barker KN. Fundamentals of medication error research. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990; 47: 555–71.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cavell GF. Scheme for anonymous reporting of medication errors. Pharm J. 1993; 251: 796.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ashp standard definition of a medication error. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1982; 39: 321.

  8. Cavell GF, Hughes DK. Does computerized prescribing improve the accuracy of drug administration? Pharm J. 1997; 259: 782–4.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Carlsson A, Lidgren L, Lindberg L. Prophylactic antibiotics against early and late deep infections after total hip replacements. Acta Orthop Scand 1977; 48: 405–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Surgery. http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/45.html.

  3. Mini E, Nobili S, Periti P. Does surgical prophylaxis with teicoplanin constitute a therapeutic advance? J Chemother 2000; 12(Suppl 5): 40–55.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Voss A, Milatovic D, Wallrauch-Schwarz C, Rosdahl VT, Braveny I. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Europe. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1994; 13:50–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Antibiotic subcomittee of the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee at Froedtert Hospital. Suggested Recommendations and Guidelines for Surgical Prophylaxis. http://www.intmed. mcw.edu/drug/SurgProph.html.

  6. Wymenga A, van Horn J, Theeuwes A, et al. Cefuroxime for prevention of post-operative coxitis. One versus three doses tested in a randomised multicenter study of 2,651 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 1992; 63: 19–24

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Mead, M. Defeating the onward march of diabetes. Chemist and Druggist 19 January, 2002, 42.

  2. Moffat, T. Point–of-care-testing in the community pharmacy. Pharm J 2001;267:267–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dept Of Health. National Service Framework for Diabetes: Standards. www.doh.gov.uk/nsf/diabetes.

  4. Diabetes UK. Diabetes UK Voluntary Group Newsletter. Winter 2002.

  5. Timbs, O (Ed). New Diabetes Care Guidelines Launched In Scotland. Pharm J 2001;267:733.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bellingham, C. New pharmacy services: what's on offer? Pharm J: 2001;267:639–40.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. American Society of Hospital Pharmacists. American Society of Hospital Pharmacists guidelines on preventing medication errors in hospitals. Am J Hosp Pharm 1996; 7: 64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Paton J, Wallace J. Medication errors. Lancet 1997; 349: 959–60.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Department of Health. National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease. Chapter 6 – Heart Failure.

  2. Watson RDS, Gibbs CR and Lip GYH. ABC of Heart Failure. Clinical features and complications. BMJ 2000; 320: 236–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Welsh Medicines Resource Centre. Drug management in heart failure. WeMeRec Bulletin 2001; 8: 5.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Guidelines for the Management of Community Acquired Pneumonia in Adults. Thorax 2001; 56 (suppl IV).

  2. Wilcox M et al. Financial burden of hospital acquired Clostridium difficile infection. Journal of Hospital Infection; 1996; 34: 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. LeFlore DB, DeSilva KE. Tricks of the trade in starting efavirenz therapy. Am J Health-System Pharmacy. 2000; 57(5): 490–491.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ruiz N. Clinical history of efavirenz. UCP supplement. June 1999.

  3. Ruiz NM, Bessen LJ, Manion DJ, et al. Potential adverse experiences associated with efavirenz. 36th Annual Meeting of the Infectious Disease Society of America. Denver, November 1998.

  4. Sustiva. Summary of Product Characteristics. DuPont Pharma: 1999.

  5. Carr A, Cooper DA. Adverse effects of antiretroviral therapy. The Lancet. 2000; 356: 1423–1430.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Guild and NPA make first joint award. Pharm J 1999;263:845.

  2. Urie J., Bryson S.M., Need for a network [letter]Pharm J 2000;264:259.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Needham D., Wong I., An expert panel review to evaluate the effectiveness of community pharmacist's interventions in the palliative care setting. Pharm J 1999;263 Suppl R32–33.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Progress in Practice: UKCPA Residential Symposium, Hilton Hotel, Blackpool, UK. Friday, 22-Sunday, 24 November 2002. Pharm World Sci 25, 51–101 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022453507394

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022453507394

Search

Navigation