Abstract
This paper reports on a two year study designed to investigate how a Web-Based Integrated Science Environment (WISE) project called Plants in Space featuring classroom investigations can enable fifth grade students to increase their understanding of plant growth and development. A multidisciplinary partnership consisting of teachers, scientists, science education researchers, and technology specialists developed this project, tested it in fifth grade, modified it based on the data collected in year one and tested it again. We investigate these two versions of the curriculum and consider how understanding of the material improved with the revised curriculum.
Participants were fifth grade students and a fifth grade teacher who was a co-developer of the curriculum and participated in the re-design process at an urban elementary school. An identical pre- and a post-subject matter assessment was administered to all students each year. Interviews and students' in-class work helped clarify the results. Overall, students made significant gains in understanding standards-based science concepts including photosynthesis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ammon, P., & Black, A. (1998). Development psychology as a guide for teaching and teacher preparation. In N. M. Lambert & B. L. McCombs (Eds.), How students learn: Reforming schools through learner-centered education (pp. 409-448). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 393-451). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Champagne, A. B., Klopfer, L. E., & Gunstone, R. F. (1982). Cognitive research and the design of science instruction. Educational Psychologist, 17(1), 31–53.
diSessa, A. A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3/4), 391–450.
Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, B., Marx, R., & Soloway (2000). Instructional, curricular, and technological supports for inquiry in science classrooms. In J. Minstell, & E. H. V. Zee (Eds.), Inquiry into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 283-315). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Linn, M. C., diSessa, A., Pea, R. D., & Songer, N. B. (1994). Can research on science learning and instruction inform standards for science education? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3(1), 7–15.
Linn, M. C. (1995). Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The scaffolded knowledge integration framework. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(2), 103–126.
Linn, M. C. (in press). WISE design for lifelong learning-Pivotal Cases. In P. Gardenfors & P. Johansson (Eds.), Cognition, education and communication technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Linn, M. C., & Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, teachers, peers: Science learning partners. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Linn, M. C., Shear, L., Bell, P., & Slotta, J. D. (1999). Organizing principles for science education partnerships: Case studies of students' learning about ‘Rats in Space’ and ‘Deformed Frogs.’ Education Technology Research & Development, 47(2), 61–84.
Rochelle, J., Pea, R., Hoadley, C., Gordin, D., & Means, B. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with collaborative technologies. The Future of Children, 10(2), 76–101.
Roth, J. J. (1989). Conceptual understanding and higher level thinking in the elementary science curriculum: Three perspectives. (Report No. SE-051-184).
Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 315303).
Songer, N. B. (1998). Can technology bring students closer to science? In K. Tobin, & B. Fraser (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 333-348). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Spitulnik, M. W., Stratford, S., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Using technology to support students' artifact construction in science. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 363-381). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning and schooling in social context. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Vye, N. J., Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., Barron, B. J., Zech, L., & the Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1998). SMART environments that support monitoring, reflection, and revision. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 305-346). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Vygotsky, L. (1972). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, NA: Harvard University Press.
White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (1995). An overview of the ThinkerTools Inquiry Project. (Causal Models Research Group No. CM-95-04). Berkeley, CA: School of Education, University of California at Berkeley.
Williams, M. (2001). How students integrate their understanding of plant growth through hands-on science and a Web-based Science Environment (WISE). Unpublished master's thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Williams, M., Linn, M.C. WISE Inquiry in Fifth Grade Biology. Research in Science Education 32, 415–436 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022452719316
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022452719316