Abstract
Philosophers of science seek to discover theessential features of science. Having donethis, these features are then proffered as a`benchmark' against which any putative sciencecan be assessed for its scientificity. Socialscientists, in particular, are much concernedwith achieving the status of genuine science.When considering the status of the socialsciences, philosophers of science also seek todiscern the essential, and differentiating,characteristics of the object of study, namely,social phenomena as such. This paper provides acritical examination of two apparentlydiametrically opposed approaches to philosophyof science, namely, realism and pragmatism. Thestance of `immanent critique' is adopted. Thisstance seeks to evaluate the success of aphilosophical programme entirely by thestandards that are internal to that programme.The conclusion reached, from this point ofview, is that realism is unrealistic, andpragmatism lacks practical utility.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bhaskar, R.: 1978, A Realist Theory of Science. Hassocks: Harvester Press.
Bhaskar, R.: 1989, The Possibility of Naturalism (2nd edn.). Hemel Hempstead: HarvesterWheatsheaf.
Blaug, M.: 1994, The Methodology of Economics: How Economists Explain. Cambridge: University Press.
Chalmers, A.: 1999, What Is this Thing Called Science? (3rd edn.). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Feyerabend, P.: 1975, Against Method. London: Verso.
Fine, A.: 1984, The Shaky Game. Chicago: University Press.
Giddens, A.: 1976, New Rules of Sociological Method. London: Hutchinson.
Giddens, A.: 1990, The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
Habermas, J.: 1991, The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Polity.
Hacking, I.: 1992, The self-Vindication of the Laboratory Sciences. In Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 29–64.
Hacking, I.: 1995, Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Personality and the Sciences of Memory. Princeton: University Press.
Hacking, I.: 1999, The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Harré, R.: 1970, Principles of Scientific Thinking. London: Macmillan.
Horkheimer, M.: 1972, Traditional and Critical Theory. In Critical Theory. New York: Herder and Herder.
Knorr-Cetina, K. and M. Mulkay (eds.): 1983, Science Observed. London: Sage.
Lakatos, I. and P. Feyerabend: 1999, For and Against Method, edited by M. Motterlini.
Latour, B. and S. Woolgar: 1986, Laboratory Life (2nd edn.). Princeton: University Press.
Pickering, A. (ed.): 1992, Science as Practice and Culture. University of Chicago Press.
Pleasants, N.: 1999, Wittgenstein and The Idea of a Critical Social Theory: A Critique of Giddens, Habermas and Bhaskar. London: Routledge.
Popper, K.: 1957, The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge.
Popper, K.: 1960, The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge.
Popper, K.: 1972, Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rorty, R.: 1982, Consequences of Pragmatism. Brighton: Harvester Press.
Rorty, R.: 1989, Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: University Press.
Rorty, R.: 1992, Is Natural Science a Natural Kind? In Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1. Cambridge: University Press.
Rorty, R.: 1999, Philosophy and Social Hope. London: Penguin.
Rouse, J.: 1987, Knowledge and Power: Towards a Political Philosophy of Science. New York: Cornell University Press.
Salmon, W.: 1998, Causality and Explanation. Oxford: University Press.
Singer, P.: 1999, Animal Liberation. London: Cape.
Weber, M.: 1930, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Routledge.
Weber, M.: 1948, Science as a Vocation. In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. London: Routledge, pp. 129–156.
Winch, P.: 1970, Understanding a Primitive Society. In B. Wilson (ed.), Rationality. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 78–111.
Winch, P.: 1990, The Idea of a Social Science (2nd edn.). London: Routledge.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1968, Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1969, The Blue and Brown Books. Oxford: Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pleasants, N. A Philosophy for the Social Sciences: Realism, Pragmatism, or neither?. Foundations of Science 8, 69–87 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022441619760
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022441619760