Advertisement

Research in Science Education

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 489–510 | Cite as

Students' Perceptions of the Effectiveness of the World Wide Web as a Research and Teaching Tool in Science Learning

  • Wan Ng
  • Richard Gunstone
Article

Abstract

Students often make little linkage from lesson to lesson on what they learn in the regular classroom. Having them take responsibility for what they are learning is one way of having them think and connect these thoughts together. This qualitative study looks at the use of the World Wide Web (WWW) as a research and teaching tool in promoting self-directed learning in a group of 15 year old students. The perceptions of students on the effectiveness of the World Wide Web in assisting them with the construction of knowledge on Photosynthesis and Respiration are reported and discussed in this paper. The study showed that the students found that the WWW had a number of positive effects on their learning including motivation for independent learning. However, the unedited and unstructured nature of the WWW meant that many of the sites they visited had information that was too difficult to understand and that time was required to improve technical and critical thinking skills to search effectively. The teacher's role as facilitator and guide was crucial to the success of their learning.

multimedia science learning science teaching WWW 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, H. J. (1999). Internet use by teachers: Conditions of professional use and teacher-directed student use (Report #1). Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information technology and Organizations, University of California, Irvine, and the University of Minnesota. http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/internet-use/texttables.pdfGoogle Scholar
  2. Boalch, G. (1996). WWW as an educational support medium: An Australian case study. In AusWeb96-the second Australian World Wide Web conference. http://www.scu.edu.au/sponsored/ausweb/ausweb96/educn/boalch/paper.htmlGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, I. (1998). The effect of WWW document structure on students' information retrieval. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 98(12). http://wwwjime.open.ac.uk/98/12/brown-98-12-01.htmlGoogle Scholar
  4. Cuban, L. (1993). Computers meet classroom: Classroom wins. Teacher's College Record, 95, 185–210.Google Scholar
  5. Dyreson, C. (1996). An experiment in class management using the World Wide Web. In AusWeb96-the second Australian World Wide Web conference. http://www.scu.edu.au/sponsored/ausweb/ausweb96/educn/dyreson/paper.htmlGoogle Scholar
  6. Dwyer, D. (1994). Apple classrooms of tomorrow: What we've learned. Educational Leadership, 51(7), 4–10.Google Scholar
  7. Eklund, J., & Eklund, P. (1996). Integrating theWeb and the teaching of technology: Cases across two universities. In AusWeb96-the second Australian World Wide Web conference. http://www.scu.edu.au/sponsored/ausweb/ausweb96/educn/eklund2/paper.htmlGoogle Scholar
  8. Fong, R. (1998, February). Students' response to the use of computer-mediated communication (CMC) for teaching chemistry. A paper presented for an online chemistry conference. http://nobel.scas.bcit.bc.ca/chemconf98/index.html-ssiGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoffman, J. L., Kupperman, J., & Wallace, R. (1997, March). On-line learning materials for the science classroom: Design methodology and implementation. In E. Soloway (Symposium chair), Using on-line digital resources to support sustained inquiry learning in K-12 science. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  10. Hoffman, J. L., Wu, H. K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (in press). The nature of middle schools learners' science content understandings with the use of on-line resources. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.Google Scholar
  11. Kafai, Y. (1995). Minds in play: Computer game design as a context for children's learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94(5), 483–497.Google Scholar
  13. Kromhout,O., & Butzin, S. (1993). Integrating computers into the elementary school curriculum. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(1), 55–69.Google Scholar
  14. Kulik, J. A. (1994). Meta-analytic studies of findings on computer-based instruction. In E. L. Baker & H. F. O'Neil, Jr. (Ed.), Technology assessment in education and training. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Lyons, D., Hoffman, J. L., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1997, March). An investigation of the use of the World Wide Web for sustained on-line inquiry in a science classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  16. Mistler-Jackson, M., & Songer, N. B. (2000). Student motivation and Internet technology: Are students empowered to learn science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 459–479.Google Scholar
  17. Murphy, E. (1997). Learning environments: Readings and reflections [WWW document]. URL http://www.stemnet.nf.ca/~elmurphy/emurphy/learning1.htmlGoogle Scholar
  18. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  19. Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Papert, S. (1993). The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  21. Pedretti, E., Mayer-Smith, J., & Woodrow, J. (1998). Technology, text and talk: Students' learning in a technology enhanced secondary science classroom. Science Education, 82, 569–589.Google Scholar
  22. Phillips, D. (Ed.). (2000). Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Gloerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intellectual technologies. Educational Researcher, 20, 2–9.Google Scholar
  24. Scanlon, E. (1997). Learning science on-line. Studies in Science Education, 30, 57–92.Google Scholar
  25. Schofield, J. W., Eurich-Fulcer, R., & Britt, C. L. (1994). New theoretical insights suggest new approaches to research: A rejoinder to Davis. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 619–625.Google Scholar
  26. Silvin-Kachala, J. (1998). Report on the effectiveness of technology in schools, 1990-1997. Washington, DC: Software Publisher's Association.Google Scholar
  27. Summary, R., & Summary, L. (1998). The effectiveness of the World Wide Web as an instructional tool [WWW document]. URL http://www.mtsu.edu/~itconf/proceed98/rsummary.htmlGoogle Scholar
  28. Vosniadou, S., De Corte, E., & Mandl, H. (Eds.). (1992). Technology-based learning environments: Psychological and educational foundations. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  29. Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Wallace, R., Kupperman, J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). Science on the Web: Students on-line in a sixth grade classroom. Journal of Learning Sciences, 9(1), 75–104.Google Scholar
  31. Weisenmayer, R. L., & Koul, R. (1998). Integrating Internet resources into the science classroom: teachers perspectives. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7(3), 271–277.Google Scholar
  32. Weisenmayer, R. L., & Meadows, G. R. (1997). Addressing science teachers initial perceptions of the classroom uses of Internet and world wide web-based resouce materials. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6(4), 329–335.Google Scholar
  33. Windschitl, M. (1998). The WWW and classroom research: What path should we take? Educational Researcher, 27(1), 28–33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wan Ng
    • 1
  • Richard Gunstone
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for EducationLa Trobe UniversityAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationMonash UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations