Skip to main content
Log in

Plants that protect ecosystems: a survey from California

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

State and federal endangered species laws allow the protection ofcritical habitat for listed plant taxa. In the case of extreme ecologicalspecialists with restricted geographic distributions, significant proportions ofunusual ecosystems could thus be afforded protection as a byproduct of listingand subsequent restrictions on land use or management practices. This studysurveyed federally and state-listed plants to determine: (1) which taxaconserved a significant proportion of a distinctive ecosystem, (2) which taxaprovided a protective, regulatory 'umbrella' to unlisted rare orrestricted plants and animals, and (3) the taxonomic, life history or othercharacteristics correlated with the greatest secondary benefits. Protection of'whole' ecosystems was uncommon among listed taxa, but the relativedegree of protection depended on critical delineation of boundaries. The numberof associated, but unlisted taxa was considerable in some cases. In general,taxonomic distinctiveness and non-biological factors generated the greatestsecondary effects. Management and monitoring problems prevent the assessment ofwhether such single-species approaches can effectively conserve ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barbour M.G. and Major J. (eds) 1988. Terrestrial Vegetation of California. California Native Plant Society Special Publication no. 1 (expanded edition). Sacramento, California, 1036 pp.

  • Bartel J.A., Skinner M.W. and Knight J.C. 1994. The Endangered Species Act and rare plant protection in California. In: Skinner M.W. and Pavlik B.M. (eds), Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. California Native Plant Society Special Publication no. 1. 5th edn (338 pp). Sacramento, California, pp. 30–33.

  • Beadle N.C.W. 1981. The Vegetation of Australia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1262 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittman R. 1994. The Natural Diversity Data Base: California's Natural Heritage Program. In: Skinner M.W. and Pavlik B.M. (eds), Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. California Native Plant Society Special Publication no. 1. 5th edn (338 pp). Sacramento, California, pp. 25–26.

  • Cameron E.K., de Lange P.J., Given D.R., Johnson P.N. and Ogle C.C. 1995. New Zealand Botanical Society threatened and local plant lists. Newsletter of the New Zealand Botanical Society 39: 15–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheatham N.D. and Haller J.R. 1975. An Annotated List of California Habitat Types. University of California Natural Land and Water Reserves System, Berkeley, California, 77 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coats R., Showers M.A. and Pavlik B.M. 1993. Management plan for an alkali sink and its endangered plant Cordylanthus palmatus. Environmental Management 17: 115–127. Coates D.J., Hopper S.D. and Farrer S.L. (eds) (2000) Genetics and Conservation of Australian Flora. Australian Journal of Botany (Special Issue) 48: 287–416.

  • Fiedler P.L. and Ahouse J.J. 1992. Hierarchies of cause: toward an understanding of rarity in vascular plant species. In: Fiedler P.L. and Jain S.K. (eds), Conservation Biology: The Theory and Practice of Nature Conservation, Preservation and Management. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp. 23–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Given D.R. 1981. Rare and Endangered Plants of New Zealand. A.H. & A.W. Reed Ltd., Sydney, Australia, 154 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Given D.R. 1994. Principles and Practice of Plant Conservation. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, 292 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Given D.R. 1998. An assessment of the endangered plants of New Zealand. In: Peng C.-I. and Lowry II P.P. (eds), Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Floras of Asia and the Pacific Rim. Taipei Academia Sinica Monograph Series no. 16, pp. 227–242.

  • Hickman J.C. 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. University of California, Berkeley, California, 1400 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland R.F. 1986. Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California. Nongame-Heritage Program. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California, 156 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh J. and Briggs J. 1992. Threatened Australian Plants – Overview and Case Studies. Australian National Parks and Wildlife Service, Canberra, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey S. and Berg K. 1994. Conserving plants with laws and programs under the Department of Fish and Game. In: Skinner M.W. and Pavlik B.M. (eds), Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. California Native Plant Society Special Publication no. 1. 5th edn (338 pp). Sacramento, California, pp. 21–24.

  • NRC (National Research Council) 1995. Science and the Endangered Species Act. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 271 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik B.M. 1989. Phytogeography of sand dunes in the Great Basin and Mojave deserts. Journal of Biogeography 16: 227–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik B.M. 1996. Conserving plant species diversity: the challenge of recovery. In: Szaro R.C. and Johnson D.W. (eds), Biodiversity in Managed Landscapes: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 359–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik B.M. 1997. Perspectives, tools and institutions for conserving rare plants. Southwestern Naturalist 42: 375–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik B.M. and Manning E. 1993. Assessing limitations on the growth of endangered plant populations. I. Experimental demography of Erysimum capitatum ssp. angustatum and Oenothera deltoides ssp. howellii. Biological Conservation 65: 257–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik B.M. and Skinner M.W. 1994. Ecological characteristics of California's rare plants. In: Skinner M.W. and Pavlik B.M. (eds), Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. California Native Plant Society Special Publication no. 1. 5th edn (338 pp). Sacramento, California, pp. 4–6.

  • Pavlik B.M., Randall J., Smith A. and Metz N. 2001. Development of the Santa Rosa Vernal Reserve System. III. First-year response of margin and upland habitats to mowing and phytomass removal. State of California, Department of Fish and Game, Plant Conservation Program, Sacramento, California, 172 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner M.W. and Pavlik B.M. (eds) 1994. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. California Native Plant Society Special Publication no. 1. 5th edn. Sacramento, California, 338 pp.

  • Wardle P. 1990. Vegetation of New Zealand. Cambridge University Press, London, 672 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pavlik, B.M. Plants that protect ecosystems: a survey from California. Biodiversity and Conservation 12, 717–729 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022420911839

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022420911839

Navigation