Abstract
This study focused on the use of the Artemis web-based interface http://artemis.goknow.com/artemis/index.adp). This program provides a digital library for students to search, organise, and evaluation science information related to project-based investigations. The primary feature of the Artemis interface is a focused search tool. Key scaffolding features in Artemis include the collections of web sites, driving question folders, a persistent workspace for notes, cataloging of past search results, and the viewing of sites shared by other students. The primary goal of this study was to describe high school science students' use of the scaffolding features embedded in the Artemis interface. The researchers were interested in identifying the scaffolding features students use and describing how they use them in the context of finding science information related to investigations. In addition, to look at scaffolding interaction, relationships between feature use and student learning were examined. The context of this study was a four-week science investigation conducted by 43 high school biology students. Students worked in dyads to answer driving questions related to their topics of study (e.g., What do the conditions need to be in order for green algae to survive?). It was found that students relied heavily upon Organisational Feature scaffolds (persistent workspace) to help them organise information that was ultimately used by the students to produce domain specific artifacts. In addition, students spent much of their time conducting searches and saving results. However, classroom performance success was only significantly correlated with the use of Organizational Feature scaffolds – scaffolding features that students use to create driving questions, write notes about the information they found as a result of their searches, and keep track of their investigations. No other search tool used by the students possessed this important scaffolding feature. The students did not automatically use Collaborative Features – scaffolding features hypothesised to be powerful cognitive tools.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbas, J. M. (2001). Smoothing the information seeking path: Removing representational obstacles in the middle school digital library environment. Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas, Denton, TX.
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 369–398.
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Edelson, D. C., Pea, R. D., & Gomez, L. M. (1996, April). The collaboratory notebook: Support for collaborative inquiry. Communications of the ACM, 39, 32–33.
Goetz, J., & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. New York: Academic Press.
Hoffman, J. L., Wu, H.-K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (in press). The nature of learners' science content understandings with the use of on-line resources. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
Jackson, S. L., Stratford, S. J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1994). Making dynamic modeling accessible to precollege science students. Interactive Learning Environments, 4(3), 233–257.
Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., & Fredricks, J. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3-4), 313–350.
Krajcik, J., Soloway, E., Blumenfeld, P., & Marx (1998). Scaffolded technology tools to promote teaching and learning in science. In C. Dede (Ed.), ASCD Yearbook, 1998, Learning with technology (pp. 31-46). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McKenzie, J. (2000). Beyond technology: Questioning, research and the information literate school community. Bellingham,WA: FNO Press.
Mistler-Jackson, M., & Songer, N. (2000). Student motivation and internet technology: Are students empowered to learning science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 459–479.
National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: Authors.
Njoo, M., & de Jong, T. (1993). Exploratory learning with a computer simulation for control theory: Learning processes and instructional support. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 821–844.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Soloway, E., Guzdial, M., & Hay, K. E. (1994). Learner-centered design: The challenge for HCL in the 21st century. Interactions, 37–48.
Wallace, R., Soloway, E., Krajcik, J., Bos, N., Hoffman, J., Hunter, H. et al. (1998). Artemis: Learner-centered design of an information seeking environment for K-12 education. Proceedings of the conference on Computer Human Interaction (CHI), 187–194.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lumpe, A.T., Butler, K. The Information Seeking Strategies of High School Science Students. Research in Science Education 32, 549–566 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022415924768
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022415924768