Abstract
Certain contradictions and inaccuracies in the classical theory of the α-Rossi stochastic neutron method are pointed out. An alternative theory which is almost free of contradictions and deficiencies of the classical theory is presented.
A new implementation regime for the method is proposed to eliminate any influence of the prestart dip on the correlated amplitude in the α-Rossi method using modern time-delay analyzers – the scaled start regime, consisting in triggerings of the time-delay analyzer scaled by two, three, or more signals from the starting neutron detector. It is shown that the correlated amplitude contains the ratio of the first and second moments of the number of prompt neutrons in a chain.
A new expression is obtained for taking account of the spatial-energy effect in the α-Rossi method. The effect differs from the well-known one not only by the energy component but also by a large range of possible values.
The possibilities of the α-Rossi method for determining the physical parameters of multiplying and nonmultiplying media are considered: α, k p, k, βeff, F, F s, and D.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
R. Feyman, F. Hoffmann, and R. Serber, “Dispersion of the neutron emission in U-235 fission,” J. Nucl. Energy, 3, 64–69 (1956).
J. Orndoff, “Prompt neutron periods of metal assemblies,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 2, 450–460 (1957).
V. G. Zolotukhin and A. I. Mogil'ner, “On the distribution of the number of counts of a neutron detector placed in a reactor,” At. Énerg., 15, No. 1, 11–15 (1963).
D. Babala, “Point-reactor theory of Rossi-α experiment,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 28, 237–242 (1967).
T. Iijima, “Basic studies on Rossi-α experiment the correlation amplitude,” J. Nucl. Sci. Tech., No. 12, 624–628 (1968).
J. Kipin, Physical Principles of the Kinetics of Nuclear Reactors [Russian translation], Atomizdat, Moscow (1967).
A. I. Mogil'ner, “Stochastic kinetics of nuclear reactors,” in: Pulsed and Statistical Methods for Studying Reactors, Obninsk (1969), Vol. 1, 362–447.
V. A. Dulin and G. M. Mikhailov, “Measurement of the effective fraction of delayed neutrons by the α-Rossi method,” At. Énerg., 78, No. 3, 151–155 (1995).
V. F. Efimenko, V. K. Mozhaev, and V. A. Dulin, “Use of a fission chamber with a 252Cf layer in certain physical measurements,” At. Énerg., 39, No. 1, 54–56 (1975).
A. G. Shokod'ko, É. A. Stumbur, V. G. Kulebyakin, and V. M. Sluchevskaya, “Spontaneous neutron bursts as a source for determining the reactivity by the Shestrand pulse method,” Preprint FÉI-824 (1978).
É. A. Strumbur, I. P. Matveenko, and A. G. Shokod'ko, “Integrated pulsed methods for measuring reactivity,” in: Theoretical and Experimental Problems of Nonstationary Neutron Transport, Atomizdat, Moscow (1972), pp. 245–267.
A. G. Shokod'ko, “Exact equation for the kinetics of a nuclear reactor,” Vopr. At. Nauk. Tekh. Ser. Fiz. Tekh. Yad. Reakt., No. 4, 3–9 (1988).
M. Otsuka and T. Iijima, “Space-dependent formula for Rossi-α measurements,” Nukleonik., 7, 488–493 (1965).
J. Dragt, Reactor Centrum Nederland, Petten, RCN-101 (1968).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shokod'ko, A.G. Drawbacks of the Classical Theory of the α-Rossi Method and Its Alternative. Atomic Energy 93, 880–886 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022403604077
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022403604077