Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender, Race, and Aggression in Television Commercials That Feature Children

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Television commercials in programming aimed at young children were content analyzed. Over one-third of the commercials that featured children contained aggression. More than half of the aggressive incidents occurred in commercials that featured only White children, thus offering them many models for possible imitation or for later use in cognitive scripts. The predominant type of aggression was “fortuitous,” i.e., aggression not caused by a character. These unmotivated acts of aggression may cultivate in children fear of a “scary world.” Further, this level of aggression may desensitize children to aggression in their own lives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, A., & Morrison, M. (1995). Electronic toyland and the structures of power: An analysis of critical studies on children as consumers. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 12, 344–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, E. (1993). Exploring the effects of active parental mediation of television content. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 37, 147–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: Social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1994). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 61–90). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, E. (1997, October 6). TV 101: Teaching kids how to watch wisely. Minneapolis Star Tribune, pp. A1, A10.

  • Burgi, M. (1996, January 29). Nick claims kingdom: Cable network says it has more 2–11 viewers than broadcast nets. Mediaweek, 6, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Public Education (2001). Children, adolescents and television. Pediatrics, 107, 423–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danitz, T. (2000, October 29). Bullying linked to school shootings. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, p. A–10.

  • Findings on families and TV study. (1997, May 25). Denver Post, p. B–06.

  • Geen, R. (1994). Television and aggression: Recent developments in research and theory. In D. Zillman, J. Bryant, & A. Huston (Eds.), Media, children, and the family (pp. 151–162). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26, 173–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1980). The "mainstreaming" of America: Violence profile No. 11. Journal of Communication, 30, 10–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1994). Growing up with television: The cultivation perspective. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 17–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, B., Edison, N., Korzenny, F., Fernandez-Collado, C., & Atkin, C. (1980). Antisocial and prosocial behaviors on television. In B. Greenberg (Ed.), Life on television: Content analyses of U.S. TV drama (pp. 99–128). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, B. (1994). The question of media violence. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 163–212). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, B. (1998). Ethnicity and involvement in violence on television. Journal of Black Studies, 28, 683–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffner, C., & Cantor, J. (1991). Perceiving and responding to mass media characters. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes (pp. 63–102). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, A., Zillman, D., & Bryant, J. (1994). Media influence, public policy, and the family. In D. Zillman, J. Bryant, & A. Huston (Eds.), Media, children, and the family (pp. 3–18). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jussim, L. (1990). Social reality and social problems: The role of expectancies. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 9–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juvenile Violence Timeline. (2000). The Washington Post [Online]. Retrieved http://www.washingtonpost.com

  • Kurtz, H. (2000, August 26). Columbine bully talk persists: Some parents accuse principal of wearing rose-colored glasses. Denver Rocky Mountain News, p. 5A.

  • Larson, M. (2001). Interactions, activities and gender in children's television commercials: A content analysis. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 45, 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, M. (2002). Race and interracial relationships in children's television commercials. The Howard Journal of Communications, 13, 223–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesser, G. (1974). Children and television: Lessons from Sesame Street. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macklin, M., & Kolbe, R. (1984). Gender role stereotyping in children's advertising: Current and past trends. Journal of Advertising, 13, 34–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, B, Sandage, D., & Weatherby, G. (2000). Violence, morality, and television commercials. Sociological Spectrum, 20(1), 121–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathanson, A. (1999). Identifying and explaining the relationship between parental mediation and children's aggression. Communication Research, 26, 124–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathanson, A., & Cantor, J. (2000). Reducing the aggression-promoting effect of violent cartoons by increasing children's fictional involvement with the victim: A study of active mediation. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44, 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, W., Warren, R., Vaughn, M., Howley, K., Land, A., & Hagemeyer, J. (1997). Antisocial acts in reality programming on television. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 41, 69–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rideout, V., Foehr, U., Roberts, D., & Brodie, M. (1999). Kids & media @ the new millennium. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riffe, D., Goldson, H., Saxton, K., & Yu, Y. (1989). Females and minorities in TV ads in 1987 Saturday children's programs. Journalism Quarerly, 66, 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, L. (1992, April 7). Researcher links violence on TV with aggression. Christian Science Monitor, p. 8.

  • TV Parental Guidelines. (1999). Retrieved from http://tvguidelines.org/guidelin.htm

  • Welch, R., Huston-Stein, A., Wright, J., & Plehal, R. (1979). Subtle sex-role cues in children's commercials. Journal of Communication, 29, 202–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B., Kunkel, D., Linz, D., Potter, J., Donnerstein, E., Smith, S., et al. (1997). Television violence and its context: University of California, Santa Barbara study. In M. Seawell (Ed.), National Violence Study (Vol. 1, pp. 3–268). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, R., & Dominick, J. (2003). Mass media research: An introduction (7th ed.). Belmont CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, 60115

    Mary Strom Larson

Authors
  1. Mary Strom Larson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Larson, M.S. Gender, Race, and Aggression in Television Commercials That Feature Children. Sex Roles 48, 67–75 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022396729398

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022396729398

Search

Navigation