Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Psycholegal Scholarship's Contribution to False Consciousness About Injustice

  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

The field of psychology and law began with an avowed focus on social justice. In the past two decades, that focus has been diverted. With justice defined more narrowly than previously, psycholegal research has contributed to false consciousness about the degree to which law reduces injustice and promotes social change. Primary components of false consciousness about law include the belief that procedural justice is more important than substantive or distributive justice, the acceptance of legal doctrines that support corporate capitalism, and the belief that the strict rule of law is inherently superior to individualized equity and commonsense justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Albee, G. W. (1986). Toward a just society: Lessons from observations on the primary prevention of psychopathology. American Psychologist, 41, 891–898.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Azzi, A. E., & Jost, J. T. (1997). Votes without power: Procedural justice as mutual control in majority-minority relations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 124–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, H. (1982). People without government: An anthropology of anarchism. London: Kahn & Averill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J. (1992). Justice and the law. In K. R. Scherer (Ed.), Justice: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 114–142). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J., & Schokkaert, E. (1992). Interdisciplinary theory and research on justice. In K. R. Scherer (Ed.), Justice: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 237–253). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belliotti, R. A. (1995). The legacy of Marxist jurisprudence. In D. S. Caudill & S. J. Gold (Eds.), Radical philosophy of law: Contemporary challenges to mainstream legal theory and practice (pp. 3–31). Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeckmann, R. J., & Tyler, T. R. (1997). Commonsense justice and inclusion within the moral community: When do people receive procedural protection from others? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 362–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonsignore, J. J. (1994). Law and multinationals: An introduction to political economy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caudill, D. S., & Gold, S. J. (Eds.). (1995). Radical philosophy of law: Contemporary challenges to mainstream legal theory and practice. Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1973). For reasons of state. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clastres, P. (1977). Society against the state: The leader as servant and the humane uses of power among the Indians of the Americas. (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Urizen Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1985). Procedural justice and participation. Human Relations, 38, 643–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1986). Power and justice in intergroup relations. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations (pp. 65–84). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1987). Distributive justice: Theory and research. Social Justice Research, 1, 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1989). Fabrications of justice. Social Justice Research, 3, 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1991). Membership, intergroup relations, and justice. In R. Vermunt & H. Steensma (Eds.), Social justice in human relations (Vol. 1, pp. 239–258). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (in preparation). Silencing: The social construction of silence.

  • Daly, J. P., & Tripp, T. M. (1996). Is outcome fairness used to make procedural fairness judgments when procedural information is inaccessible? Social Justice Research, 9, 327–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social-psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., & Steil, J. M. (1988). Awakening the sense of injustice. Social Justice Research, 2, 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, S. (1974). In search of the primitive. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, H. J. (Ed.). (1996). Reinventing anarchy, again. San Francisco: AK Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, H. J. (Ed.). (1997). The anarchist agenda: A symposium. Social Anarchism, 24, 30–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, H. J., Ehrlich, C., DeLeon, D., & Morris, G. (1996). Questions and answers about anarchism. In H. J. Ehrlich (Ed.), Reinventing anarchy, again (pp. 4–18). San Francisco: AK Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, N. J. (1995). Commonsense justice: Jurors' notions of the law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, N. J. (1997). Commonsense justice, psychology, and the law: Prototypes that are common, senseful, and not. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 461–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, N. J. (1998, March). But it's not fair! Commonsense notions of fairness. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, Redondo Beach, CA.

  • Finkel, N. J., & Sales, B. D. (Eds.). (1997). Commonsense justice [Special Issue]. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3(2/3).

  • Fox, D. R. (1985). Psychology, ideology, utopia, and the commons. American Psychologist, 40, 48–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D. R. (1986). Beyond individualism and centralization. American Psychologist, 41, 231–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D. R. (1991). Social science's limited role in resolving psycholegal social problems. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 17, 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D. R. (1993a). The autonomy-community balance and the equity-law distinction: Anarchy's task for psychological jurisprudence. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 11, 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D. R. (1993b). Psychological jurisprudence and radical social change. American Psychologist, 48, 234–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D. R. (1993c). Where's the proof that law is a good thing? Law and Human Behavior, 17, 257–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D. R. (1996). The law says corporations are persons, but psychology knows better. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 14, 339–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D. R. (1997a). Falsa conciencia sobre la legitimidad de la ley. Psicología Política, 15, 39–57. [English translation, False consciousness about law's legitimacy, available from the author.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D. (1997b). Psychology and law: Justice diverted. In D. Fox & I. Prilleltensky (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (pp. 217–232). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D. R. (1998). Response to Geis on anti-corporate polemics. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 16, 273–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D. R., & Prilleltensky, I. (1996). The inescapable nature of politics in psychology: A response to O'Donohue and Dyslin. New Ideas in Psychology, 14, 21–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D., & Prilleltensky, I. (Eds.). (1997). Critical psychology: An introduction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1975). Cultural action for freedom (monograph). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1955). The sane society. New York: Holt, Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geis, G. (1998). Fox on corporate personhood, limited liability, and community control: A critique. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 16, 265–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, G. (1975). The Storrs Lectures: The age of anxiety. Yale Law Journal, 84, 1022–1044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, P. (1979). Reflections on the anarchist principle. In T. Stoehr (Ed.), Drawing the line: The political essays of Paul Goodman (pp. 176–177). New York: Dutton. (Original work published 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., & Cohen, R. L. (Eds.). (1982). Equity and justice in social behavior. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T., & Saks, M. J. (1991). Psychology's influence on constitutional interpretation. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 205–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, C. (1980). Psychological and legal change: On the limits of a factual jurisprudence. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 147–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, C. (1991). The Fourteenth Amendment and symbolic legality: Let them eat due process. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 183–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, C. (1993). Psychology and legal change: The impact of a decade. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 371–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, C. (1997). Commonsense justice and capital punishment: Problematizing the “will of the people.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 303–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hans, V. P. (1990). Attitudes toward corporate responsibility: A psycholegal perspective. Nebraska Law Review, 69, 158–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, B. (1997). Repoliticizing the history of psychology. In D. Fox & I. Prilleltensky (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (pp. 21–33). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, E. (1995). The romance of American psychology: Political culture in the age of experts. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holterman, T., & van Maarseveen, H. (Eds.). (1984). Law and anarchism. Montreal: Black Rose.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T. (1995). Negative illusions: Conceptual clarification and psychological evidence concerning false consciousness. Political Psychology, 16, 397–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagehiro, D. K., & Laufer, W. S. (Eds.). (1992). Handbook of psychology and law. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kairys, D. (Ed.). (1998). The politics of law: A progressive critique (3rd ed.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, A. (1986). No contest: The case against competition. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, A. (1990). The brighter side of human nature: Altruism and empathy in everyday life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lempert, R., & Sanders, J. (1986). An invitation to law and social science: Desert, disputes, and distribution. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1982). The justice motive in human relations and the economic model of man: A radical analysis of facts and fictions. In V. J. Derlega & J. Grzelak (Eds.), Cooperation and helping behavior: Theories and research (pp. 249–278). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M J. (1987). Social science perspectives on justice [Special Issue]. Social Justice Research, 1(1).

  • Lerner, M., & Torstrick, R. (1994). Social justice issues: An introduction. Social Justice Research, 7, 301–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, F. J. (1994). June Louin-Tapp (1929–1992) [Obituary]. American Psychologist, 49, 965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride, W. L. (1974). An overview of future possibilities: Law unlimited? In J. R. Pennock & J. W. Chapman (Eds.), The limits of law: Nomos XV (pp. 28–38). New York: Lieber-Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B. (1988). The significance of law in the everyday lives of children and families. Georgia Law Review, 22, 851–895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B. (1990a). Law, science, and humanity: The normative foundation of social science in law. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 315–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B. (1990b). Realism in psychology and humanism in law: Psycholegal studies at Nebraska. Nebraska Law Review, 69, 251–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B. (1991). President's column. American Psychology-Law Society News, (Summer), 1–3.

  • Melton, G. B. (1992). The law is a good thing (psychology is, too). Human rights in psychological jurisprudence. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 381–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B., & Saks, M. J. (1986). The law as an instrument of socialization and social structure. In G. B. Melton (Ed.), The law as a behavioral instrument (pp. 235–277). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menkel-Meadow, C. (1985). Portia in a different voice: Speculations on a women's lawyering process. Berkeley Women's Law Journal, 1, 39–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1994). [Review of the book Justice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives]. Social Justice Research, 7, 167–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. T., & McFarland, C. (1991). When social comparison goes awry: The case of pluralistic ignorance. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 287–313). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minow, M. (1998). Politics and procedure. In D. Kairys (Ed.), The politics of law: A progressive critique (3rd ed.) (pp. 79–96). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, J., & Novaco, R. W. (1980). Corporate violence: A psychological analysis. In P. D. Lipsitt & B. D. Sales (Eds.), New directions in psycholegal research (pp. 3–25). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montero, M. (1997). Political psychology: A critical perspective. In D. Fox & I. Prilleltensky (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (pp. 233–244). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B., Jr. (1978). Injustice: The social bases of obedience and revolt. White Plains, NY: Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, R. A. (1965). The place and function of pure equity in the structure of law. Hastings Law Journal, 16, 401–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orbell, J. M., & Rutherford, B. (1973). Can Leviathan make the life of man less solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short? British Journal of Political Science, 3, 383–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pancer, S. M. (1997). Social psychology: The crisis continues. In D. Fox & I. Prilleltensky (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (pp. 150–165). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parenti, M. (1996). Dirty truths: Reflections on politics, media, ideology, conspiracy, ethnic life and class power. San Francisco: City Light.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I. (1994). The morals and politics of psychology: Psychological discourse and the status quo. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I. (1997). Values, assumptions, and practices: Assessing the moral implications of psychological discourse and action. American Psychologist, 52, 517–535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I., & Fox, D. (1997). Introducing critical psychology: Values, assumptions, and the status quo. In D. Fox & I. Prilleltensky (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (pp. 3–20). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I., & Nelson, G. (1997). Community psychology: Reclaiming social justice. In D. Fox & I. Prilleltensky (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (pp. 166–184). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roesch, R. (1995). Creating change in the legal system: Contributions from community psychology. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 325–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röhl, K. F., & Machura, S. (Eds.), (1997). Procedural justice. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saks, M. (1986). The law does not live by eyewitness testimony alone. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 279–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, E. E. (1976). Social psychology and contemporary society. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, E. E. (1983). Justice and the critique of pure psychology. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, E. E. (1994). Justice and the neutral state: A postmodern feminist critique of Lehning's account of justice. Social Justice Research, 7, 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S. B. (1976). Community psychology and the anarchist insight. American Journal of Community Psychology, 4, 243–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (Ed.). (1992). Justice: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shklar, J. N. (1990). The faces of injustice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silbey, S. S. (1997). “Let them eat cake”: Globalization, postmodern colonialism, and the possibilities of justice. Law and Society Review, 31, 207–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, T. W. (1995). A theory of social injustice. In D. S. Caudill & S. J. Gold (Eds.), Radical philosophy of law: Contemporary challenges to mainstream legal theory and practice (pp. 54–72). Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, T. (1996). Damaged life: The crisis of the modern psyche. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, T. (1997). Theories of personality: Ideology and beyond. In D. Fox & I. Prilleltensky (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (pp. 87–103). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, T. (Chair). (1998, August). Theory for a change: Critical psychology, feminism, and postmodernism. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.

  • Small, M. A. (1997, August). Content analysis of Law and Human Behavior articles. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago.

  • Smith, P. (Ed.). (1993). Feminist jurisprudence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapp, J. L. (1974). The psychological limits of legality. In J. R. Pennock & J. W. Chapman (Eds.), The limits of law: Nomos xv (pp. 46–75). New York: Lieber-Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapp, J. L., & Levine, F. J. (1977a). Epilogue for psychology and law. In J. L. Tapp & F. J. Levine (Eds.), Law, justice, and the individual in society: Psychological and legal issues (pp. 363–368). New York: Holt, Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapp, J. L., & Levine, F. J. (Eds.). (1977b). Law, justice, and the individual in society: Psychological and legal issues. (pp. 3–9). New York: Holt, Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapp, J. L., & Levine, F. J. (1977c). Reflections and redirections. In J. L. Tapp & F. J. Levine (Eds.), Law, justice, and the individual in society: Psychological and legal issues (pp. 3–9). New York: Holt, Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, A. J., Victor, B., & Adler, R. (1992). Psycholegal aspects of organizational behavior: Assessing and controlling risk. In D. K. Kagehiro & W. S. Laufer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology and law (pp. 523–541). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Törnblom, K. (1992). The social psychology of distributive justice. In K. R. Scherer (Ed.), Justice: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 177–236). Cambridge Cambridge University Press.

  • Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1994). The obligations of management and employees' rights in a free market economy: Comments on the presentation of Joel Brockner. Social Justice Research, 7, 365–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1996). The relationship of the outcome and procedural fairness: How does knowing the outcome influence judgments about the procedure? Social Justice Research, 9, 311–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Boeckmann, R. J. (1997). Three strikes and you are out, but why? The psychology of public support for punishing rule breakers. Law and Society Review, 31, 237–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & McGraw, K. M. (1986). Ideology and the interpretation of personal experience: Procedural justice and political quiescence. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. & Mitchell, G. (1994). Legitimacy and the empowerment of discretionary legal authority: The United States Supreme Court and abortion rights. Duke Law Journal, 43, 703–802.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K. A., & Griffin, E. (1986). Alternative images of the citizen: Implications for public policy. American Psychologist, 41, 970–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, R., & Törnblom, K. (Eds.). (1996). Distributive and Procedural Justice [Special Issue]. Social Justice Research, 9(4).

  • Wachtel, P. L. (1983). The poverty of affluence: A psychological portrait of the American way of life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, P. (1983). Critical social psychology. Boston: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, R. L., Watts, B. A., & Stolle, D. P. (1993). Psychological jurisprudence and the information processing paradigm. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 11, 79–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, S. (1997). Feminist psychology. In D. Fox & I. Prilleltensky (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (pp. 247–264). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winick, B. J. (1997). The jurisprudence of therapeutic jurisprudence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 184–206.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Fox, D.R. Psycholegal Scholarship's Contribution to False Consciousness About Injustice. Law Hum Behav 23, 9–30 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022370622463

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022370622463

Keywords

Navigation